The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities
Abstract Background Many people use handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms under the impression that these amenities are hygienic. However, such facilities may be potential sites for the transmission of pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to examine the hygiene facilities provi...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-02-01
|
Series: | Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-019-0500-z |
id |
doaj-243ed0787a0644ef91d2c037998c0b0c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-243ed0787a0644ef91d2c037998c0b0c2020-11-25T02:08:41ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942019-02-01811610.1186/s13756-019-0500-zThe public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilitiesLorna K. P. Suen0Gilman K. H. Siu1Yue Ping Guo2Simon K. W. Yeung3Kiki Y. K. Lo4Margaret O’Donoghue5School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityAbstract Background Many people use handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms under the impression that these amenities are hygienic. However, such facilities may be potential sites for the transmission of pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to examine the hygiene facilities provided including handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms. Total bacterial counts and species identification were determined for hand-drying facilities. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were performed. Methods The bacterial contamination levels of 55 public washrooms ranging in category from low class communities to high end establishments, were examined. The hygienic environment and facilities of the washrooms were analysed using an electronic checklist to facilitate immediate data entry. Pre-moistened sterile swabs were used to collect samples from areas around the outlet of paper towel dispensers, air outlet of air dryers, exit door handles and paper towels in the washrooms. Total bacterial counts were performed and isolates identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion. Results The high and middle-income categories washrooms generally had cleaner facilities and environment followed by those in low categories. Fifty-two bacterial species were identified from the 55 investigated washrooms. Over 97% of the pathogenic Staphylococcus spp. tested were resistant to at least one first-line antimicrobial therapeutic agent, including penicillin, cefoxitin, erythromycin, co-trimoxazole, clindamycin and gentamicin, and 22.6% demonstrated co-resistance to at least three antimicrobial agents, with co-resistance to penicillin, erythromycin and clindamycin being the most common. Conclusion Our findings suggest that hand-drying facilities in public washrooms can act as reservoirs of drug-resistant bacteria. The importance of frequent cleaning and maintenance of public washrooms to promote safe hand hygiene practices for the public are emphasised.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-019-0500-zWashroomEnvironmental microbiologyMALDI-TOF MSHand hygieneAntimicrobialBacteria |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Lorna K. P. Suen Gilman K. H. Siu Yue Ping Guo Simon K. W. Yeung Kiki Y. K. Lo Margaret O’Donoghue |
spellingShingle |
Lorna K. P. Suen Gilman K. H. Siu Yue Ping Guo Simon K. W. Yeung Kiki Y. K. Lo Margaret O’Donoghue The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control Washroom Environmental microbiology MALDI-TOF MS Hand hygiene Antimicrobial Bacteria |
author_facet |
Lorna K. P. Suen Gilman K. H. Siu Yue Ping Guo Simon K. W. Yeung Kiki Y. K. Lo Margaret O’Donoghue |
author_sort |
Lorna K. P. Suen |
title |
The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities |
title_short |
The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities |
title_full |
The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities |
title_fullStr |
The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities |
title_full_unstemmed |
The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities |
title_sort |
public washroom - friend or foe? an observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control |
issn |
2047-2994 |
publishDate |
2019-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Many people use handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms under the impression that these amenities are hygienic. However, such facilities may be potential sites for the transmission of pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to examine the hygiene facilities provided including handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms. Total bacterial counts and species identification were determined for hand-drying facilities. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were performed. Methods The bacterial contamination levels of 55 public washrooms ranging in category from low class communities to high end establishments, were examined. The hygienic environment and facilities of the washrooms were analysed using an electronic checklist to facilitate immediate data entry. Pre-moistened sterile swabs were used to collect samples from areas around the outlet of paper towel dispensers, air outlet of air dryers, exit door handles and paper towels in the washrooms. Total bacterial counts were performed and isolates identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion. Results The high and middle-income categories washrooms generally had cleaner facilities and environment followed by those in low categories. Fifty-two bacterial species were identified from the 55 investigated washrooms. Over 97% of the pathogenic Staphylococcus spp. tested were resistant to at least one first-line antimicrobial therapeutic agent, including penicillin, cefoxitin, erythromycin, co-trimoxazole, clindamycin and gentamicin, and 22.6% demonstrated co-resistance to at least three antimicrobial agents, with co-resistance to penicillin, erythromycin and clindamycin being the most common. Conclusion Our findings suggest that hand-drying facilities in public washrooms can act as reservoirs of drug-resistant bacteria. The importance of frequent cleaning and maintenance of public washrooms to promote safe hand hygiene practices for the public are emphasised. |
topic |
Washroom Environmental microbiology MALDI-TOF MS Hand hygiene Antimicrobial Bacteria |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-019-0500-z |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lornakpsuen thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT gilmankhsiu thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT yuepingguo thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT simonkwyeung thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT kikiyklo thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT margaretodonoghue thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT lornakpsuen publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT gilmankhsiu publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT yuepingguo publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT simonkwyeung publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT kikiyklo publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities AT margaretodonoghue publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities |
_version_ |
1724926014497226752 |