The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities

Abstract Background Many people use handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms under the impression that these amenities are hygienic. However, such facilities may be potential sites for the transmission of pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to examine the hygiene facilities provi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lorna K. P. Suen, Gilman K. H. Siu, Yue Ping Guo, Simon K. W. Yeung, Kiki Y. K. Lo, Margaret O’Donoghue
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-02-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-019-0500-z
id doaj-243ed0787a0644ef91d2c037998c0b0c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-243ed0787a0644ef91d2c037998c0b0c2020-11-25T02:08:41ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942019-02-01811610.1186/s13756-019-0500-zThe public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilitiesLorna K. P. Suen0Gilman K. H. Siu1Yue Ping Guo2Simon K. W. Yeung3Kiki Y. K. Lo4Margaret O’Donoghue5School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityDepartment of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversitySchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityAbstract Background Many people use handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms under the impression that these amenities are hygienic. However, such facilities may be potential sites for the transmission of pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to examine the hygiene facilities provided including handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms. Total bacterial counts and species identification were determined for hand-drying facilities. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were performed. Methods The bacterial contamination levels of 55 public washrooms ranging in category from low class communities to high end establishments, were examined. The hygienic environment and facilities of the washrooms were analysed using an electronic checklist to facilitate immediate data entry. Pre-moistened sterile swabs were used to collect samples from areas around the outlet of paper towel dispensers, air outlet of air dryers, exit door handles and paper towels in the washrooms. Total bacterial counts were performed and isolates identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion. Results The high and middle-income categories washrooms generally had cleaner facilities and environment followed by those in low categories. Fifty-two bacterial species were identified from the 55 investigated washrooms. Over 97% of the pathogenic Staphylococcus spp. tested were resistant to at least one first-line antimicrobial therapeutic agent, including penicillin, cefoxitin, erythromycin, co-trimoxazole, clindamycin and gentamicin, and 22.6% demonstrated co-resistance to at least three antimicrobial agents, with co-resistance to penicillin, erythromycin and clindamycin being the most common. Conclusion Our findings suggest that hand-drying facilities in public washrooms can act as reservoirs of drug-resistant bacteria. The importance of frequent cleaning and maintenance of public washrooms to promote safe hand hygiene practices for the public are emphasised.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-019-0500-zWashroomEnvironmental microbiologyMALDI-TOF MSHand hygieneAntimicrobialBacteria
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lorna K. P. Suen
Gilman K. H. Siu
Yue Ping Guo
Simon K. W. Yeung
Kiki Y. K. Lo
Margaret O’Donoghue
spellingShingle Lorna K. P. Suen
Gilman K. H. Siu
Yue Ping Guo
Simon K. W. Yeung
Kiki Y. K. Lo
Margaret O’Donoghue
The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Washroom
Environmental microbiology
MALDI-TOF MS
Hand hygiene
Antimicrobial
Bacteria
author_facet Lorna K. P. Suen
Gilman K. H. Siu
Yue Ping Guo
Simon K. W. Yeung
Kiki Y. K. Lo
Margaret O’Donoghue
author_sort Lorna K. P. Suen
title The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities
title_short The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities
title_full The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities
title_fullStr The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities
title_full_unstemmed The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities
title_sort public washroom - friend or foe? an observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities
publisher BMC
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
issn 2047-2994
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Abstract Background Many people use handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms under the impression that these amenities are hygienic. However, such facilities may be potential sites for the transmission of pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to examine the hygiene facilities provided including handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms. Total bacterial counts and species identification were determined for hand-drying facilities. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were performed. Methods The bacterial contamination levels of 55 public washrooms ranging in category from low class communities to high end establishments, were examined. The hygienic environment and facilities of the washrooms were analysed using an electronic checklist to facilitate immediate data entry. Pre-moistened sterile swabs were used to collect samples from areas around the outlet of paper towel dispensers, air outlet of air dryers, exit door handles and paper towels in the washrooms. Total bacterial counts were performed and isolates identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion. Results The high and middle-income categories washrooms generally had cleaner facilities and environment followed by those in low categories. Fifty-two bacterial species were identified from the 55 investigated washrooms. Over 97% of the pathogenic Staphylococcus spp. tested were resistant to at least one first-line antimicrobial therapeutic agent, including penicillin, cefoxitin, erythromycin, co-trimoxazole, clindamycin and gentamicin, and 22.6% demonstrated co-resistance to at least three antimicrobial agents, with co-resistance to penicillin, erythromycin and clindamycin being the most common. Conclusion Our findings suggest that hand-drying facilities in public washrooms can act as reservoirs of drug-resistant bacteria. The importance of frequent cleaning and maintenance of public washrooms to promote safe hand hygiene practices for the public are emphasised.
topic Washroom
Environmental microbiology
MALDI-TOF MS
Hand hygiene
Antimicrobial
Bacteria
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-019-0500-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lornakpsuen thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT gilmankhsiu thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT yuepingguo thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT simonkwyeung thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT kikiyklo thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT margaretodonoghue thepublicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT lornakpsuen publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT gilmankhsiu publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT yuepingguo publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT simonkwyeung publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT kikiyklo publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
AT margaretodonoghue publicwashroomfriendorfoeanobservationalstudyofwashroomcleanlinesscombinedwithmicrobiologicalinvestigationofhandhygienefacilities
_version_ 1724926014497226752