The Semen Quantity and Quality of Two Fowl Strains Supplemented with Vitamin E (α–Tocopherol)
The study on semen quantity and quality of Kampung and Arab fowl under various levels of vitamin E supplementation was conducted, using 2x4 factorial Completely Randomized Design with 4 replicates. Analysis of variance followed by Duncan New Multiple Range Test were used to analyze the data. Level...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Jenderal Soedirman (UNSOED), Faculty of Animal Science
2005-05-01
|
Series: | Animal Production |
Online Access: | http://animalproduction.net/index.php/JAP/article/view/105 |
Summary: | The study on semen quantity and quality of Kampung and Arab fowl under various levels of vitamin E supplementation was conducted, using 2x4 factorial Completely Randomized Design with 4 replicates. Analysis of variance followed by Duncan New Multiple Range Test were used to analyze the data. Levels of vitamin E given orally were 0 IU (control); 2 IU (t1); 4 IU (t2) and 8 IU (t3) per bird daily. The results showed that semen volume was not affected by genotype (Kampung: 0.26 ± 0.05 ml Vs. Arab: 0.22 ± 0.05 ml) while the vitamin E treatments significantly (P<0.05) affected the semen volume i.e. 0.16 ± 0.06 ml (control); 0.27 ± 0.04 ml (t1); 0.28 ± 0.03 ml (t2) and 0.23 ± 0.03 ml (t3). Semen viscosity was not affected by genotype, but was substantially affected by vitamin E treatments. The semen pH was not influenced by all treatments given, spermatozoa concentration of Kampung (1.80 ± 0.39 billion/ml) was not significantly different with that of Arab (1.86 ± 0.16 billion/ml). Vitamin E treatments resulted in different (P<0.05) spermatozoa concentration among control (1.50 ± 0.16 billion/ml), t1 (1.98 ± 0.14 billion/ml), t2 (2.01 ± 0.09 billion/ml) and t3 (1.87 ± 0.18 billion/ml). No significant different found on semen mass movement between Kampung and Arab, also among vitamin E treatments. The spermatozoa motility of Kampung and Arab was not statistically different, however vitamin E improved motility significantly (P<0.05); control (2.90 ± 0.59); t1 (3.5 ± 0.16); t2 (3.54 ± 0.25) and t3 (3.44 ± 0.48). Percentage of dead spermatozoa of Kampung and Arab were 18.24 ± 1.98% and 17.35 ± 2.74%, while vitamin E supplementation results were as follows 18.10 ± 3.03% (control); 18.54 ± 2.01% (t1); 17.72 ± 1.47% (t2) and 16.82 ± 2.87% (t3) no significant different was found. Percentage of abnormal spermatozoa of Kampung (4.35 ± 0.80%) and Arab (4.64 ± 0.87%) was not different statistically. Among the vitamin E treatments the results was as follows 4.31 ± 1.40% (control); 4.75 ± 0.69% (t1); 4.94 ± 1.91% (t2) and 3.97 ± 1.14% (t3). However, significant (P<0.05) interaction effects were found in Kampung males at treatment t2 (4 IU) and t3 (8 IU). (Animal Production 7(2): 67-73 (2005)
Key Words: Kampung, Arab, Fowl, Semen, Vitamin E |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2541-5875 2541-5875 |