Efficiency of hospital cholera treatment in Ecuador

This study analyzed the efficiency of cholera treatment in three hospitals representative of the Ecuadorian public health system in order to provide hospital directors and administrators and health service policy-makers with information to plan responses to future epidemics and to reduce the costs o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Creamer Germán, León Ninfa, Kenber Mark, Samaniego Pablo, Buchholz Gregory
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pan American Health Organization 1999-01-01
Series:Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
Online Access:http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1020-49891999000200002
id doaj-242cd22403134046bf52e6868c8115dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-242cd22403134046bf52e6868c8115dd2020-11-24T23:40:47ZengPan American Health OrganizationRevista Panamericana de Salud Pública1020-49891999-01-01527787Efficiency of hospital cholera treatment in EcuadorCreamer GermánLeón NinfaKenber MarkSamaniego PabloBuchholz GregoryThis study analyzed the efficiency of cholera treatment in three hospitals representative of the Ecuadorian public health system in order to provide hospital directors and administrators and health service policy-makers with information to plan responses to future epidemics and to reduce the costs of cholera treatment in general. For the study, total and excess cholera treatment costs were calculated using hospital files and statistics and an in-hospital surveillance system of the cholera cases. The type and quantity of each input used for each treatment were analyzed, as well as the number of days hospitalized, according to the severity of the illness. With this process, excess costs were determined in relation to a "treatment norm" that would have been appropriate for each patient. The researchers found that 45% of the cholera treatment costs were excessive. The most important contributor was excess recurrent costs (90%), including extended hospital stays, disproportionate use of intravenous rehydration solutions, and unnecessary laboratory tests. Excess capital costs, from land, buildings, and hospital equipment, represented 10% of the total excess treatment costs. No significant relationship was found between treatment costs and the severity of the illness, nor between costs and a patient's age. A patient's sex appeared to be an important variable, with the cost of treating women being notably higher than for men. An inverse relationship was found between treatment costs and the complexity of the hospital. The researchers concluded there was an inefficient use of resources in the treatment of cholera in the three hospitals where the research was performed.http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1020-49891999000200002
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Creamer Germán
León Ninfa
Kenber Mark
Samaniego Pablo
Buchholz Gregory
spellingShingle Creamer Germán
León Ninfa
Kenber Mark
Samaniego Pablo
Buchholz Gregory
Efficiency of hospital cholera treatment in Ecuador
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
author_facet Creamer Germán
León Ninfa
Kenber Mark
Samaniego Pablo
Buchholz Gregory
author_sort Creamer Germán
title Efficiency of hospital cholera treatment in Ecuador
title_short Efficiency of hospital cholera treatment in Ecuador
title_full Efficiency of hospital cholera treatment in Ecuador
title_fullStr Efficiency of hospital cholera treatment in Ecuador
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency of hospital cholera treatment in Ecuador
title_sort efficiency of hospital cholera treatment in ecuador
publisher Pan American Health Organization
series Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
issn 1020-4989
publishDate 1999-01-01
description This study analyzed the efficiency of cholera treatment in three hospitals representative of the Ecuadorian public health system in order to provide hospital directors and administrators and health service policy-makers with information to plan responses to future epidemics and to reduce the costs of cholera treatment in general. For the study, total and excess cholera treatment costs were calculated using hospital files and statistics and an in-hospital surveillance system of the cholera cases. The type and quantity of each input used for each treatment were analyzed, as well as the number of days hospitalized, according to the severity of the illness. With this process, excess costs were determined in relation to a "treatment norm" that would have been appropriate for each patient. The researchers found that 45% of the cholera treatment costs were excessive. The most important contributor was excess recurrent costs (90%), including extended hospital stays, disproportionate use of intravenous rehydration solutions, and unnecessary laboratory tests. Excess capital costs, from land, buildings, and hospital equipment, represented 10% of the total excess treatment costs. No significant relationship was found between treatment costs and the severity of the illness, nor between costs and a patient's age. A patient's sex appeared to be an important variable, with the cost of treating women being notably higher than for men. An inverse relationship was found between treatment costs and the complexity of the hospital. The researchers concluded there was an inefficient use of resources in the treatment of cholera in the three hospitals where the research was performed.
url http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1020-49891999000200002
work_keys_str_mv AT creamergerman efficiencyofhospitalcholeratreatmentinecuador
AT leonninfa efficiencyofhospitalcholeratreatmentinecuador
AT kenbermark efficiencyofhospitalcholeratreatmentinecuador
AT samaniegopablo efficiencyofhospitalcholeratreatmentinecuador
AT buchholzgregory efficiencyofhospitalcholeratreatmentinecuador
_version_ 1725509011738984448