Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Engineered nanomaterials display unique properties that may have impact on human health, and thus require a reliable evaluation of their potential toxicity. Here, we performed a standardized <it>in vitro </it>screening of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Göbbert Christian, Schulze-Isfort Christian, Wohlleben Wendel, Hahn Daniela, Rommel Christina, Dierker Christian, Kroll Alexandra, Voetz Matthias, Hardinghaus Ferdinand, Schnekenburger Jürgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-02-01
Series:Particle and Fibre Toxicology
Online Access:http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/8/1/9
id doaj-241a98412bd84580b6fb8ca415bb33b1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-241a98412bd84580b6fb8ca415bb33b12020-11-24T20:44:15ZengBMCParticle and Fibre Toxicology1743-89772011-02-0181910.1186/1743-8977-8-9Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assaysGöbbert ChristianSchulze-Isfort ChristianWohlleben WendelHahn DanielaRommel ChristinaDierker ChristianKroll AlexandraVoetz MatthiasHardinghaus FerdinandSchnekenburger Jürgen<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Engineered nanomaterials display unique properties that may have impact on human health, and thus require a reliable evaluation of their potential toxicity. Here, we performed a standardized <it>in vitro </it>screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials. We thoroughly characterized the physicochemical properties of the nanomaterials and adapted three classical <it>in vitro </it>toxicity assays to eliminate nanomaterial interference. Nanomaterial toxicity was assessed in ten representative cell lines.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Six nanomaterials induced oxidative cell stress while only a single nanomaterial reduced cellular metabolic activity and none of the particles affected cell viability. Results from heterogeneous and chemically identical particles suggested that surface chemistry, surface coating and chemical composition are likely determinants of nanomaterial toxicity. Individual cell lines differed significantly in their response, dependent on the particle type and the toxicity endpoint measured.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p><it>In vitro </it>toxicity of the analyzed engineered nanomaterials cannot be attributed to a defined physicochemical property. Therefore, the accurate identification of nanomaterial cytotoxicity requires a matrix based on a set of sensitive cell lines and <it>in vitro </it>assays measuring different cytotoxicity endpoints.</p> http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/8/1/9
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Göbbert Christian
Schulze-Isfort Christian
Wohlleben Wendel
Hahn Daniela
Rommel Christina
Dierker Christian
Kroll Alexandra
Voetz Matthias
Hardinghaus Ferdinand
Schnekenburger Jürgen
spellingShingle Göbbert Christian
Schulze-Isfort Christian
Wohlleben Wendel
Hahn Daniela
Rommel Christina
Dierker Christian
Kroll Alexandra
Voetz Matthias
Hardinghaus Ferdinand
Schnekenburger Jürgen
Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays
Particle and Fibre Toxicology
author_facet Göbbert Christian
Schulze-Isfort Christian
Wohlleben Wendel
Hahn Daniela
Rommel Christina
Dierker Christian
Kroll Alexandra
Voetz Matthias
Hardinghaus Ferdinand
Schnekenburger Jürgen
author_sort Göbbert Christian
title Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays
title_short Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays
title_full Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays
title_fullStr Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays
title_full_unstemmed Cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays
title_sort cytotoxicity screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials using a test matrix of ten cell lines and three different assays
publisher BMC
series Particle and Fibre Toxicology
issn 1743-8977
publishDate 2011-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Engineered nanomaterials display unique properties that may have impact on human health, and thus require a reliable evaluation of their potential toxicity. Here, we performed a standardized <it>in vitro </it>screening of 23 engineered nanomaterials. We thoroughly characterized the physicochemical properties of the nanomaterials and adapted three classical <it>in vitro </it>toxicity assays to eliminate nanomaterial interference. Nanomaterial toxicity was assessed in ten representative cell lines.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Six nanomaterials induced oxidative cell stress while only a single nanomaterial reduced cellular metabolic activity and none of the particles affected cell viability. Results from heterogeneous and chemically identical particles suggested that surface chemistry, surface coating and chemical composition are likely determinants of nanomaterial toxicity. Individual cell lines differed significantly in their response, dependent on the particle type and the toxicity endpoint measured.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p><it>In vitro </it>toxicity of the analyzed engineered nanomaterials cannot be attributed to a defined physicochemical property. Therefore, the accurate identification of nanomaterial cytotoxicity requires a matrix based on a set of sensitive cell lines and <it>in vitro </it>assays measuring different cytotoxicity endpoints.</p>
url http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/8/1/9
work_keys_str_mv AT gobbertchristian cytotoxicityscreeningof23engineerednanomaterialsusingatestmatrixoftencelllinesandthreedifferentassays
AT schulzeisfortchristian cytotoxicityscreeningof23engineerednanomaterialsusingatestmatrixoftencelllinesandthreedifferentassays
AT wohllebenwendel cytotoxicityscreeningof23engineerednanomaterialsusingatestmatrixoftencelllinesandthreedifferentassays
AT hahndaniela cytotoxicityscreeningof23engineerednanomaterialsusingatestmatrixoftencelllinesandthreedifferentassays
AT rommelchristina cytotoxicityscreeningof23engineerednanomaterialsusingatestmatrixoftencelllinesandthreedifferentassays
AT dierkerchristian cytotoxicityscreeningof23engineerednanomaterialsusingatestmatrixoftencelllinesandthreedifferentassays
AT krollalexandra cytotoxicityscreeningof23engineerednanomaterialsusingatestmatrixoftencelllinesandthreedifferentassays
AT voetzmatthias cytotoxicityscreeningof23engineerednanomaterialsusingatestmatrixoftencelllinesandthreedifferentassays
AT hardinghausferdinand cytotoxicityscreeningof23engineerednanomaterialsusingatestmatrixoftencelllinesandthreedifferentassays
AT schnekenburgerjurgen cytotoxicityscreeningof23engineerednanomaterialsusingatestmatrixoftencelllinesandthreedifferentassays
_version_ 1716817938930991104