A multicenter prospective randomized study comparing the efficacy of escalating higher biphasic versus low biphasic energy defibrillations in patients presenting with cardiac arrest in the in-hospital environment
Venkataraman Anantharaman,1 Seow Yian Tay,2 Peter George Manning,3 Swee Han Lim,1 Terrance Siang Jin Chua,4 Mohan Tiru,5 Rabind Antony Charles,1 Vidya Sudarshan1 1Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 3Emergency Medic...
Main Authors: | Anantharaman V, Tay SY, Manning PG, Lim SH, Chua TSJ, Tiru M, Charles RA, Sudarshan V |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dove Medical Press
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Open Access Emergency Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.dovepress.com/a-multicenter-prospective-randomized-study-comparing-the-efficacy-of-e-peer-reviewed-article-OAEM |
Similar Items
-
Assessment of the Efficacy of Pulsed Biphasic Defibrillation Shocks for Treatment of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
by: Jean-Philippe Didon, et al.
Published: (2008-10-01) -
Is there an Optimal Shape of the Defibrillation Shock: Constant Current vs. Pulsed Biphasic Waveforms
by: Ivan Dotsinsky, et al.
Published: (2013-04-01) -
A Randomized Comparison of Delivered Energy in Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation: Biphasic Truncated Exponential Versus Pulsed Biphasic Waveforms
by: Elina Trendafilova, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
The Role of Biphasic Shocks for Transthoracic Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation
by: Simon J Walsh, et al.
Published: (2005-10-01) -
Anticipatory manual defibrillator charging during advanced life support: A scoping review
by: Quentin Otto, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)