Intersectional analysis of Advanced Placement Physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicity

Access and performance in advanced high school physics have been persistently inequitable when considering student ethnicity and gender. This quasiexperimental, observational study examined access and performance of students in four Advanced Placement (AP) Physics courses in 2018–2019: AP Physics 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Krakehl, Angela M. Kelly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Physical Society 2021-07-01
Series:Physical Review Physics Education Research
Online Access:http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020105
id doaj-240fdcdea59f4a549541cd6b1aa68e4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-240fdcdea59f4a549541cd6b1aa68e4c2021-07-29T17:43:34ZengAmerican Physical SocietyPhysical Review Physics Education Research2469-98962021-07-0117202010510.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020105Intersectional analysis of Advanced Placement Physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicityRobert KrakehlAngela M. KellyAccess and performance in advanced high school physics have been persistently inequitable when considering student ethnicity and gender. This quasiexperimental, observational study examined access and performance of students in four Advanced Placement (AP) Physics courses in 2018–2019: AP Physics 1 (N=150 451), AP Physics 2 (N=20 466), AP Physics C Mechanics (N=49 951), and AP Physics C Electricity & Magnetism (N=21 602); this analysis utilized an intersectional lens of ethnicity and gender in identifying enrollment and performance disparities. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to determine whether the distribution of student ethnicities and genders of students who took the examinations was similar to that of U.S. schools. Further analyses were conducted to determine whether achievement on AP Physics examinations varied by 14 unique intersectional groups characterized by gender and ethnicity. Results indicated that AP Physics 1 was a relatively accessible course, though enrollment disparities among genders, ethnicities, and intersectional groups grew as the AP Physics courses became more advanced with physics and/or calculus prerequisites or corequisites. There were large decreases in course enrollments from first- to second-year AP Physics courses, particularly for women who were also underrepresented ethnic minorities. In terms of performance, AP Physics 1 had the lowest overall weighted average, with the majority of students failing the examination. Women who were traditionally underrepresented ethnic minorities were found to have failure rates of over 80% on the AP Physics 1 examination, and failure rates near 50% for AP Physics 2 and the AP Physics C courses compared to nonminority men who had approximately half the failure rates. In most cases, men outperformed women who shared their ethnicities. These results present opportunities for physics education policy makers and researchers to design interventions for students in intersecting marginalized social groups, many of whom have disproportionately low representation and achievement in advanced high school physics, which occurs at a critical juncture in the physics pipeline.http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020105
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Krakehl
Angela M. Kelly
spellingShingle Robert Krakehl
Angela M. Kelly
Intersectional analysis of Advanced Placement Physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicity
Physical Review Physics Education Research
author_facet Robert Krakehl
Angela M. Kelly
author_sort Robert Krakehl
title Intersectional analysis of Advanced Placement Physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicity
title_short Intersectional analysis of Advanced Placement Physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicity
title_full Intersectional analysis of Advanced Placement Physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicity
title_fullStr Intersectional analysis of Advanced Placement Physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicity
title_full_unstemmed Intersectional analysis of Advanced Placement Physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicity
title_sort intersectional analysis of advanced placement physics participation and performance by gender and ethnicity
publisher American Physical Society
series Physical Review Physics Education Research
issn 2469-9896
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Access and performance in advanced high school physics have been persistently inequitable when considering student ethnicity and gender. This quasiexperimental, observational study examined access and performance of students in four Advanced Placement (AP) Physics courses in 2018–2019: AP Physics 1 (N=150 451), AP Physics 2 (N=20 466), AP Physics C Mechanics (N=49 951), and AP Physics C Electricity & Magnetism (N=21 602); this analysis utilized an intersectional lens of ethnicity and gender in identifying enrollment and performance disparities. Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to determine whether the distribution of student ethnicities and genders of students who took the examinations was similar to that of U.S. schools. Further analyses were conducted to determine whether achievement on AP Physics examinations varied by 14 unique intersectional groups characterized by gender and ethnicity. Results indicated that AP Physics 1 was a relatively accessible course, though enrollment disparities among genders, ethnicities, and intersectional groups grew as the AP Physics courses became more advanced with physics and/or calculus prerequisites or corequisites. There were large decreases in course enrollments from first- to second-year AP Physics courses, particularly for women who were also underrepresented ethnic minorities. In terms of performance, AP Physics 1 had the lowest overall weighted average, with the majority of students failing the examination. Women who were traditionally underrepresented ethnic minorities were found to have failure rates of over 80% on the AP Physics 1 examination, and failure rates near 50% for AP Physics 2 and the AP Physics C courses compared to nonminority men who had approximately half the failure rates. In most cases, men outperformed women who shared their ethnicities. These results present opportunities for physics education policy makers and researchers to design interventions for students in intersecting marginalized social groups, many of whom have disproportionately low representation and achievement in advanced high school physics, which occurs at a critical juncture in the physics pipeline.
url http://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020105
work_keys_str_mv AT robertkrakehl intersectionalanalysisofadvancedplacementphysicsparticipationandperformancebygenderandethnicity
AT angelamkelly intersectionalanalysisofadvancedplacementphysicsparticipationandperformancebygenderandethnicity
_version_ 1721248079087140864