“Standing Up for Canadian Oil & Gas Families”: Tracing Gender, Family, and Work In the Alberta Petro-economy

Drawing on the social media content of four pro-oil Facebook groups, we argue that these ‘subsidized publics’ play an increasingly critical role in facilitating oil and gas companies’ continued accumulation of fossil capital. We adopt O’Shaughnessy and Krogman’s (2011) analytical framework to revea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alicia Massie, Emma Jackson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Toronto Libraries 2020-02-01
Series:MediaTropes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mediatropes.com/index.php/Mediatropes/article/view/33669
id doaj-2407d225f03d4a25b7d4bea00346b6cc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2407d225f03d4a25b7d4bea00346b6cc2020-11-25T01:34:32ZengUniversity of Toronto LibrariesMediaTropes1913-60052020-02-017210.33137/mt.v7i2.33669“Standing Up for Canadian Oil & Gas Families”: Tracing Gender, Family, and Work In the Alberta Petro-economyAlicia Massie0Emma Jackson1Simon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Alberta Drawing on the social media content of four pro-oil Facebook groups, we argue that these ‘subsidized publics’ play an increasingly critical role in facilitating oil and gas companies’ continued accumulation of fossil capital. We adopt O’Shaughnessy and Krogman’s (2011) analytical framework to reveal material-discursive contradictions obscured from view in the pages of these online groups. Through deploying gendered and familial discourses, these subsidized publics celebrate traditional gender roles, present oil as a ubiquitous and benevolent force, and blur the divide between oil and gas workers on the one hand, and absentee transnational employers on the other. In an era of advanced neoliberal petro-capitalism, these quasi-public entities are masking the inherently unequal power relationship that exists between the two. Moreover, in projecting a working-class ethos, we argue that these familial and gendered discourses create a homogenizing narrative, advancing the false notion of a “classless and horizontally beneficial” industry (Gaventa, 1982, p. 58). Our analysis disrupts neoliberal representations of de-gendered extraction and highlights the extent to which gender remains a key axis within resource communities.https://mediatropes.com/index.php/Mediatropes/article/view/33669oil sandsfamilismextractionsubsidized publicsfeminist media analysisgender
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alicia Massie
Emma Jackson
spellingShingle Alicia Massie
Emma Jackson
“Standing Up for Canadian Oil & Gas Families”: Tracing Gender, Family, and Work In the Alberta Petro-economy
MediaTropes
oil sands
familism
extraction
subsidized publics
feminist media analysis
gender
author_facet Alicia Massie
Emma Jackson
author_sort Alicia Massie
title “Standing Up for Canadian Oil & Gas Families”: Tracing Gender, Family, and Work In the Alberta Petro-economy
title_short “Standing Up for Canadian Oil & Gas Families”: Tracing Gender, Family, and Work In the Alberta Petro-economy
title_full “Standing Up for Canadian Oil & Gas Families”: Tracing Gender, Family, and Work In the Alberta Petro-economy
title_fullStr “Standing Up for Canadian Oil & Gas Families”: Tracing Gender, Family, and Work In the Alberta Petro-economy
title_full_unstemmed “Standing Up for Canadian Oil & Gas Families”: Tracing Gender, Family, and Work In the Alberta Petro-economy
title_sort “standing up for canadian oil & gas families”: tracing gender, family, and work in the alberta petro-economy
publisher University of Toronto Libraries
series MediaTropes
issn 1913-6005
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Drawing on the social media content of four pro-oil Facebook groups, we argue that these ‘subsidized publics’ play an increasingly critical role in facilitating oil and gas companies’ continued accumulation of fossil capital. We adopt O’Shaughnessy and Krogman’s (2011) analytical framework to reveal material-discursive contradictions obscured from view in the pages of these online groups. Through deploying gendered and familial discourses, these subsidized publics celebrate traditional gender roles, present oil as a ubiquitous and benevolent force, and blur the divide between oil and gas workers on the one hand, and absentee transnational employers on the other. In an era of advanced neoliberal petro-capitalism, these quasi-public entities are masking the inherently unequal power relationship that exists between the two. Moreover, in projecting a working-class ethos, we argue that these familial and gendered discourses create a homogenizing narrative, advancing the false notion of a “classless and horizontally beneficial” industry (Gaventa, 1982, p. 58). Our analysis disrupts neoliberal representations of de-gendered extraction and highlights the extent to which gender remains a key axis within resource communities.
topic oil sands
familism
extraction
subsidized publics
feminist media analysis
gender
url https://mediatropes.com/index.php/Mediatropes/article/view/33669
work_keys_str_mv AT aliciamassie standingupforcanadianoilgasfamiliestracinggenderfamilyandworkinthealbertapetroeconomy
AT emmajackson standingupforcanadianoilgasfamiliestracinggenderfamilyandworkinthealbertapetroeconomy
_version_ 1725071361948254208