Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]

Background: Differences in descriptions can influence people’s evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers’ unethical behavior. The present study tried to replicate the previo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wen Guo, Huanxu Liu, Jingwen Yang, Yuqi Mo, Can Zhong, Yuki Yamada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: F1000 Research Ltd 2020-08-01
Series:F1000Research
Online Access:https://f1000research.com/articles/9-996/v1
id doaj-23ee5fb9d86a4730a32aefe95aa2ca61
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23ee5fb9d86a4730a32aefe95aa2ca612020-11-25T04:05:17ZengF1000 Research LtdF1000Research2046-14022020-08-01910.12688/f1000research.25573.128223Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]Wen Guo0Huanxu Liu1Jingwen Yang2Yuqi Mo3Can Zhong4Yuki Yamada5Graduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanGraduate School of Human-Environment Studies, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanFaculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanBackground: Differences in descriptions can influence people’s evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers’ unethical behavior. The present study tried to replicate the previous finding in the Japanese context (Experiment 1); additionally, we explored the influence of unfamiliar Japanese instruction words that captured participants’ attention (Experiment 2). Methods: In two online experiments, participants were asked to make 10 coin-tosses and report the number of “heads” results, which would indicate the amount of money that they could earn. In Experiment 1, we analyzed the difference in the number of “heads” results as reported by 768 participants under three conditions with different instructions (“Don’t cheat” vs. “Don’t be a cheater” vs. baseline as a control). In Experiment 2, we conducted an extended experiment with an additional task in which more attention was directed toward the text. Results: In Experiment 1, we successfully replicated the results of the original experiment. The results of Experiment 2 showed no evidence that the results in Experiment 1 were influenced by attentional factors. Conclusions: In conclusion, the results of the present study supported the hypothesis that self-identity-related words of moral reminder curb unethical behaviors more effectively. Stage 1 report: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20183.4https://f1000research.com/articles/9-996/v1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wen Guo
Huanxu Liu
Jingwen Yang
Yuqi Mo
Can Zhong
Yuki Yamada
spellingShingle Wen Guo
Huanxu Liu
Jingwen Yang
Yuqi Mo
Can Zhong
Yuki Yamada
Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
F1000Research
author_facet Wen Guo
Huanxu Liu
Jingwen Yang
Yuqi Mo
Can Zhong
Yuki Yamada
author_sort Wen Guo
title Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_short Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_fullStr Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_full_unstemmed Stage 2 Registered Report: How subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
title_sort stage 2 registered report: how subtle linguistic cues prevent unethical behaviors [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
publisher F1000 Research Ltd
series F1000Research
issn 2046-1402
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Background: Differences in descriptions can influence people’s evaluations and behaviors. A previous study by Bryan and colleagues suggested that subtle linguistic differences in ethical reminders can differentially prevent readers’ unethical behavior. The present study tried to replicate the previous finding in the Japanese context (Experiment 1); additionally, we explored the influence of unfamiliar Japanese instruction words that captured participants’ attention (Experiment 2). Methods: In two online experiments, participants were asked to make 10 coin-tosses and report the number of “heads” results, which would indicate the amount of money that they could earn. In Experiment 1, we analyzed the difference in the number of “heads” results as reported by 768 participants under three conditions with different instructions (“Don’t cheat” vs. “Don’t be a cheater” vs. baseline as a control). In Experiment 2, we conducted an extended experiment with an additional task in which more attention was directed toward the text. Results: In Experiment 1, we successfully replicated the results of the original experiment. The results of Experiment 2 showed no evidence that the results in Experiment 1 were influenced by attentional factors. Conclusions: In conclusion, the results of the present study supported the hypothesis that self-identity-related words of moral reminder curb unethical behaviors more effectively. Stage 1 report: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.20183.4
url https://f1000research.com/articles/9-996/v1
work_keys_str_mv AT wenguo stage2registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion1peerreview2approved
AT huanxuliu stage2registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion1peerreview2approved
AT jingwenyang stage2registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion1peerreview2approved
AT yuqimo stage2registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion1peerreview2approved
AT canzhong stage2registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion1peerreview2approved
AT yukiyamada stage2registeredreporthowsubtlelinguisticcuespreventunethicalbehaviorsversion1peerreview2approved
_version_ 1724434770923880448