Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer

Background and purpose: Describe the survival rates and distribution of events on competing failure types in vulvar carcinoma after treatment with chemoradiation (CRT) or radiation (RT) alone. Material and methods: We included patients with vulvar carcinoma treated with CRT or RT between 2009 and 20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christina Steen Vorbeck, Ivan Richter Vogelius, Marie Louise Vorndran Cøln Banner-Voigt, Hanne From Mathiesen, Mansoor Raza Mirza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-08-01
Series:Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630817300034
id doaj-23e22c8773ad43ad8958045f09ec9fee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23e22c8773ad43ad8958045f09ec9fee2021-06-02T06:44:57ZengElsevierClinical and Translational Radiation Oncology2405-63082017-08-015C202710.1016/j.ctro.2017.06.002Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancerChristina Steen VorbeckIvan Richter VogeliusMarie Louise Vorndran Cøln Banner-VoigtHanne From MathiesenMansoor Raza MirzaBackground and purpose: Describe the survival rates and distribution of events on competing failure types in vulvar carcinoma after treatment with chemoradiation (CRT) or radiation (RT) alone. Material and methods: We included patients with vulvar carcinoma treated with CRT or RT between 2009 and 2014. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed a competing risk analysis and included five competing events: loco-regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis, LRF plus distant metastasis, and death without evidence of disease, with the remaining patients denoted alive without evidence of disease. Results: 87 patients were treated. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were 40% and 57%, respectively. 41.3% of patients relapsed, most often loco-regionally. We saw significantly worse PFS and OS for patients older than 68 (p = 0.011/p = 0.010) and for patients treated with definitive RT (p = 0.004/p = 0.005). Competing risk analysis showed increased risk of LRF, and that death was most often related to vulvar cancer. Death without disease recurrence was less frequent, even in the elderly. Conclusions: LRF was the most common event. PFS and OS were inferior for elderly patients and patients treated definitively. A better understanding of these differences may be used to define risk adapted treatment strategies.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630817300034Vulvar cancerChemoradiationRadiationFailure typesElderly
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christina Steen Vorbeck
Ivan Richter Vogelius
Marie Louise Vorndran Cøln Banner-Voigt
Hanne From Mathiesen
Mansoor Raza Mirza
spellingShingle Christina Steen Vorbeck
Ivan Richter Vogelius
Marie Louise Vorndran Cøln Banner-Voigt
Hanne From Mathiesen
Mansoor Raza Mirza
Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Vulvar cancer
Chemoradiation
Radiation
Failure types
Elderly
author_facet Christina Steen Vorbeck
Ivan Richter Vogelius
Marie Louise Vorndran Cøln Banner-Voigt
Hanne From Mathiesen
Mansoor Raza Mirza
author_sort Christina Steen Vorbeck
title Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer
title_short Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer
title_full Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer
title_fullStr Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer
title_full_unstemmed Survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer
title_sort survival and failure types after radiation therapy of vulvar cancer
publisher Elsevier
series Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
issn 2405-6308
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Background and purpose: Describe the survival rates and distribution of events on competing failure types in vulvar carcinoma after treatment with chemoradiation (CRT) or radiation (RT) alone. Material and methods: We included patients with vulvar carcinoma treated with CRT or RT between 2009 and 2014. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. We performed a competing risk analysis and included five competing events: loco-regional failure (LRF), distant metastasis, LRF plus distant metastasis, and death without evidence of disease, with the remaining patients denoted alive without evidence of disease. Results: 87 patients were treated. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years were 40% and 57%, respectively. 41.3% of patients relapsed, most often loco-regionally. We saw significantly worse PFS and OS for patients older than 68 (p = 0.011/p = 0.010) and for patients treated with definitive RT (p = 0.004/p = 0.005). Competing risk analysis showed increased risk of LRF, and that death was most often related to vulvar cancer. Death without disease recurrence was less frequent, even in the elderly. Conclusions: LRF was the most common event. PFS and OS were inferior for elderly patients and patients treated definitively. A better understanding of these differences may be used to define risk adapted treatment strategies.
topic Vulvar cancer
Chemoradiation
Radiation
Failure types
Elderly
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630817300034
work_keys_str_mv AT christinasteenvorbeck survivalandfailuretypesafterradiationtherapyofvulvarcancer
AT ivanrichtervogelius survivalandfailuretypesafterradiationtherapyofvulvarcancer
AT marielouisevorndrancølnbannervoigt survivalandfailuretypesafterradiationtherapyofvulvarcancer
AT hannefrommathiesen survivalandfailuretypesafterradiationtherapyofvulvarcancer
AT mansoorrazamirza survivalandfailuretypesafterradiationtherapyofvulvarcancer
_version_ 1721407568925949952