Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth by Henry H. Bauer

While the ridiculing of new ideas and their consequent suppression is not a new phenomenon (as for example happened with Semmelweis’s proposal that disease could be reduced if doctors who delivered babies washed their hands first), changes in the nature of scientific activity have introduced new and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brian Josephson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SSE 2014-05-01
Series:Journal of Scientific Exploration
Online Access:http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/770
id doaj-23e0579d3100477a86be6d03bc7f2261
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23e0579d3100477a86be6d03bc7f22612020-11-25T03:11:17ZengSSEJournal of Scientific Exploration0892-33102014-05-01281Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth by Henry H. BauerBrian JosephsonWhile the ridiculing of new ideas and their consequent suppression is not a new phenomenon (as for example happened with Semmelweis’s proposal that disease could be reduced if doctors who delivered babies washed their hands first), changes in the nature of scientific activity have introduced new and rather sinister aspects into the phenomenon. Bauer cites the case of a letter sent by Duesberg to the journal JAIDS, disputing the number of deaths due to AIDS in South Africa quoted in an article criticizing his stance on the subject, suggesting that in that article the number of deaths had been inflated by a factor 25 relative to the official statistics. Notwithstanding the fact that the appointed referees had made no attempt to dispute his analysis, the submission was refused publication. As Bauer points out, publication of a letter alleging serious inaccuracy in a journal article would normally be automatic, unless the allegation could be refuted, but that principle was disregarded in this case. http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/770
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brian Josephson
spellingShingle Brian Josephson
Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth by Henry H. Bauer
Journal of Scientific Exploration
author_facet Brian Josephson
author_sort Brian Josephson
title Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth by Henry H. Bauer
title_short Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth by Henry H. Bauer
title_full Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth by Henry H. Bauer
title_fullStr Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth by Henry H. Bauer
title_full_unstemmed Dogmatism in Science and Medicine: How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth by Henry H. Bauer
title_sort dogmatism in science and medicine: how dominant theories monopolize research and stifle the search for truth by henry h. bauer
publisher SSE
series Journal of Scientific Exploration
issn 0892-3310
publishDate 2014-05-01
description While the ridiculing of new ideas and their consequent suppression is not a new phenomenon (as for example happened with Semmelweis’s proposal that disease could be reduced if doctors who delivered babies washed their hands first), changes in the nature of scientific activity have introduced new and rather sinister aspects into the phenomenon. Bauer cites the case of a letter sent by Duesberg to the journal JAIDS, disputing the number of deaths due to AIDS in South Africa quoted in an article criticizing his stance on the subject, suggesting that in that article the number of deaths had been inflated by a factor 25 relative to the official statistics. Notwithstanding the fact that the appointed referees had made no attempt to dispute his analysis, the submission was refused publication. As Bauer points out, publication of a letter alleging serious inaccuracy in a journal article would normally be automatic, unless the allegation could be refuted, but that principle was disregarded in this case.
url http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/770
work_keys_str_mv AT brianjosephson dogmatisminscienceandmedicinehowdominanttheoriesmonopolizeresearchandstiflethesearchfortruthbyhenryhbauer
_version_ 1724655093687517184