Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible.
Current practice in the normalization of microbiome count data is inefficient in the statistical sense. For apparently historical reasons, the common approach is either to use simple proportions (which does not address heteroscedasticity) or to use rarefying of counts, even though both of these appr...
Main Authors: | Paul J McMurdie, Susan Holmes |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-04-01
|
Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3974642?pdf=render |
Similar Items
Similar Items
-
phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data.
by: Paul J McMurdie, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Bioconductor workflow for microbiome data analysis: from raw reads to community analyses [version 1; referees: 2 approved]
by: Ben J. Callahan, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01) -
Bioconductor Workflow for Microbiome Data Analysis: from raw reads to community analyses [version 2; referees: 3 approved]
by: Ben J. Callahan, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01) -
Is unusual inadmissible evidence more difficult to ignore than neutral inadmissible evidence?
by: Karam, Tanya J.
Published: (2011) -
Camus' "Guest": The Inadmissible Complicity
by: James W. Greenlee
Published: (1978-01-01)