Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with External Connection versus Internal Conical Connection Prior to Prosthetic Loading. A Randomized Clinical Study

Introduction: The prosthetic connection of implants has been related to the loss of marginal bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate bone loss around external connection (EC) and internal conical connection (ICC) implants prior to prosthetic loading. Material and methods: A randomized clinical t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalia Palacios-Garzón, Raul Ayuso-Montero, Enric Jané-Salas, José María Anglada-Cantarell, José López-López
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Coatings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/10/11/1044
id doaj-23d9133d56aa4b9fae626c0cb7c70e0d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23d9133d56aa4b9fae626c0cb7c70e0d2020-11-25T04:01:07ZengMDPI AGCoatings2079-64122020-10-01101044104410.3390/coatings10111044Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with External Connection versus Internal Conical Connection Prior to Prosthetic Loading. A Randomized Clinical StudyNatalia Palacios-Garzón0Raul Ayuso-Montero1Enric Jané-Salas2José María Anglada-Cantarell3José López-López4Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Dentistry), University of Barcelona, 08907 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, SpainOral Health and Masticatory System Group (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute) IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, SpainOral Health and Masticatory System Group (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute) IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, SpainOral Health and Masticatory System Group (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute) IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, SpainService of the Medical-Surgical Area of Dentistry Hospital, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, SpainIntroduction: The prosthetic connection of implants has been related to the loss of marginal bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate bone loss around external connection (EC) and internal conical connection (ICC) implants prior to prosthetic loading. Material and methods: A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was carried out, with a sample size of 93 implants (31 EC and 62 ICC) placed in 27 patients. Radiological controls were performed and stability was measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) on the day of placement, at 1 month and at 4 months after the placement. Results: Bone loss in EC implants was not statistically different than in ICC implants between the time of placement (<i>T</i>0) and the subsequent month (<i>T</i>1): (EC = 0.18 mm and ICC = 0.17 mm). Between one month (<i>T</i>1) and four months (<i>T</i>2): (EC = 0.39 mm and ICC = 0.19 mm) this difference was highly significant (<i>p</i> = 0.00). Bone loss between <i>T</i>0 and <i>T</i>2 was significantly lower in the ICC (EC = 0.57 mm and ICC = 0.36 mm), (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The overall success rate of the implants was 97.8%. The stability of the implants increased from 70.69 (<i>T</i>0) to 73.91 (<i>T</i>1) and 75.32 (<i>T</i>2). Conclusions: ICC showed less bone loss up to the time of prosthesis placement. Such bone loss did not have a significant impact on bone stability. Long term RCTs are needed to demonstrate whether this bone loss, which is more pronounced at the beginning in EC, tends to stabilize and equate to ICC.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/10/11/1044external connectioninternal connectionperi-implant bone lossbone remodelingpreload prosthesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natalia Palacios-Garzón
Raul Ayuso-Montero
Enric Jané-Salas
José María Anglada-Cantarell
José López-López
spellingShingle Natalia Palacios-Garzón
Raul Ayuso-Montero
Enric Jané-Salas
José María Anglada-Cantarell
José López-López
Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with External Connection versus Internal Conical Connection Prior to Prosthetic Loading. A Randomized Clinical Study
Coatings
external connection
internal connection
peri-implant bone loss
bone remodeling
preload prosthesis
author_facet Natalia Palacios-Garzón
Raul Ayuso-Montero
Enric Jané-Salas
José María Anglada-Cantarell
José López-López
author_sort Natalia Palacios-Garzón
title Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with External Connection versus Internal Conical Connection Prior to Prosthetic Loading. A Randomized Clinical Study
title_short Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with External Connection versus Internal Conical Connection Prior to Prosthetic Loading. A Randomized Clinical Study
title_full Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with External Connection versus Internal Conical Connection Prior to Prosthetic Loading. A Randomized Clinical Study
title_fullStr Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with External Connection versus Internal Conical Connection Prior to Prosthetic Loading. A Randomized Clinical Study
title_full_unstemmed Marginal Bone Loss in Implants with External Connection versus Internal Conical Connection Prior to Prosthetic Loading. A Randomized Clinical Study
title_sort marginal bone loss in implants with external connection versus internal conical connection prior to prosthetic loading. a randomized clinical study
publisher MDPI AG
series Coatings
issn 2079-6412
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Introduction: The prosthetic connection of implants has been related to the loss of marginal bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate bone loss around external connection (EC) and internal conical connection (ICC) implants prior to prosthetic loading. Material and methods: A randomized clinical trial (RCT) was carried out, with a sample size of 93 implants (31 EC and 62 ICC) placed in 27 patients. Radiological controls were performed and stability was measured by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) on the day of placement, at 1 month and at 4 months after the placement. Results: Bone loss in EC implants was not statistically different than in ICC implants between the time of placement (<i>T</i>0) and the subsequent month (<i>T</i>1): (EC = 0.18 mm and ICC = 0.17 mm). Between one month (<i>T</i>1) and four months (<i>T</i>2): (EC = 0.39 mm and ICC = 0.19 mm) this difference was highly significant (<i>p</i> = 0.00). Bone loss between <i>T</i>0 and <i>T</i>2 was significantly lower in the ICC (EC = 0.57 mm and ICC = 0.36 mm), (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The overall success rate of the implants was 97.8%. The stability of the implants increased from 70.69 (<i>T</i>0) to 73.91 (<i>T</i>1) and 75.32 (<i>T</i>2). Conclusions: ICC showed less bone loss up to the time of prosthesis placement. Such bone loss did not have a significant impact on bone stability. Long term RCTs are needed to demonstrate whether this bone loss, which is more pronounced at the beginning in EC, tends to stabilize and equate to ICC.
topic external connection
internal connection
peri-implant bone loss
bone remodeling
preload prosthesis
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/10/11/1044
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliapalaciosgarzon marginalbonelossinimplantswithexternalconnectionversusinternalconicalconnectionpriortoprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy
AT raulayusomontero marginalbonelossinimplantswithexternalconnectionversusinternalconicalconnectionpriortoprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy
AT enricjanesalas marginalbonelossinimplantswithexternalconnectionversusinternalconicalconnectionpriortoprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy
AT josemariaangladacantarell marginalbonelossinimplantswithexternalconnectionversusinternalconicalconnectionpriortoprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy
AT joselopezlopez marginalbonelossinimplantswithexternalconnectionversusinternalconicalconnectionpriortoprostheticloadingarandomizedclinicalstudy
_version_ 1724447568845340672