Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures

Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing li...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susan Marynewich, Lorienne M. Jenstad, David R. Stapells
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Otolaryngology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513
id doaj-23c4129f63534bbbb5d69929f8e05bde
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23c4129f63534bbbb5d69929f8e05bde2020-11-25T00:11:25ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Otolaryngology1687-92011687-921X2012-01-01201210.1155/2012/921513921513Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 MeasuresSusan Marynewich0Lorienne M. Jenstad1David R. Stapells2School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2177 Wesbrook Mall, Room 443, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaSchool of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2177 Wesbrook Mall, Room 443, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaSchool of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2177 Wesbrook Mall, Room 443, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaSlow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing listeners in response to a 60 ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50, and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, and DigitalB) with two gain settings (20 and 40 dB). Results showed that SCP amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid, and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to the unaided across conditions. SCP latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from latencies in the unaided conditions; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed SCP latencies. The results of the current study (as well as several previous studies) indicate that the SCP may not accurately reflect the amplified stimulus expected from the prescribed hearing aids. Thus, “aided-SCP” results must be interpreted with caution, and more research is required concerning possible clinical use of this technique.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susan Marynewich
Lorienne M. Jenstad
David R. Stapells
spellingShingle Susan Marynewich
Lorienne M. Jenstad
David R. Stapells
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
International Journal of Otolaryngology
author_facet Susan Marynewich
Lorienne M. Jenstad
David R. Stapells
author_sort Susan Marynewich
title Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title_short Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title_full Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title_fullStr Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title_full_unstemmed Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
title_sort slow cortical potentials and amplification—part i: n1-p2 measures
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Otolaryngology
issn 1687-9201
1687-921X
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing listeners in response to a 60 ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50, and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, and DigitalB) with two gain settings (20 and 40 dB). Results showed that SCP amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid, and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to the unaided across conditions. SCP latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from latencies in the unaided conditions; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed SCP latencies. The results of the current study (as well as several previous studies) indicate that the SCP may not accurately reflect the amplified stimulus expected from the prescribed hearing aids. Thus, “aided-SCP” results must be interpreted with caution, and more research is required concerning possible clinical use of this technique.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513
work_keys_str_mv AT susanmarynewich slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures
AT loriennemjenstad slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures
AT davidrstapells slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures
_version_ 1725404123937898496