Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures
Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing li...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2012-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Otolaryngology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513 |
id |
doaj-23c4129f63534bbbb5d69929f8e05bde |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-23c4129f63534bbbb5d69929f8e05bde2020-11-25T00:11:25ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Otolaryngology1687-92011687-921X2012-01-01201210.1155/2012/921513921513Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 MeasuresSusan Marynewich0Lorienne M. Jenstad1David R. Stapells2School of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2177 Wesbrook Mall, Room 443, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaSchool of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2177 Wesbrook Mall, Room 443, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaSchool of Audiology and Speech Sciences, The University of British Columbia, 2177 Wesbrook Mall, Room 443, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, CanadaSlow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing listeners in response to a 60 ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50, and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, and DigitalB) with two gain settings (20 and 40 dB). Results showed that SCP amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid, and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to the unaided across conditions. SCP latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from latencies in the unaided conditions; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed SCP latencies. The results of the current study (as well as several previous studies) indicate that the SCP may not accurately reflect the amplified stimulus expected from the prescribed hearing aids. Thus, “aided-SCP” results must be interpreted with caution, and more research is required concerning possible clinical use of this technique.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Susan Marynewich Lorienne M. Jenstad David R. Stapells |
spellingShingle |
Susan Marynewich Lorienne M. Jenstad David R. Stapells Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures International Journal of Otolaryngology |
author_facet |
Susan Marynewich Lorienne M. Jenstad David R. Stapells |
author_sort |
Susan Marynewich |
title |
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title_short |
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title_full |
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title_fullStr |
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Slow Cortical Potentials and Amplification—Part I: N1-P2 Measures |
title_sort |
slow cortical potentials and amplification—part i: n1-p2 measures |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
International Journal of Otolaryngology |
issn |
1687-9201 1687-921X |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
Slow cortical potentials (SCPs) are currently of great interest in the hearing aid fitting process for infants; however, there is conflicting evidence in the literature concerning the use of SCPs for this purpose. The current study investigated SCP amplitudes and latencies in young normal-hearing listeners in response to a 60 ms duration tonal stimulus (1000 Hz) presented at three intensities (30, 50, and 70 dB SPL) in aided and unaided conditions using three hearing aids (Analog, DigitalA, and DigitalB) with two gain settings (20 and 40 dB). Results showed that SCP amplitudes were smaller for the digital hearing aids compared with the analog hearing aid, and none of the hearing aids resulted in a reliable increase in response amplitude relative to the unaided across conditions. SCP latencies in analog conditions were not significantly different from latencies in the unaided conditions; however, both digital hearing aids resulted in significantly delayed SCP latencies. The results of the current study (as well as several previous studies) indicate that the SCP may not accurately reflect the amplified stimulus expected from the prescribed hearing aids. Thus, “aided-SCP” results must be interpreted with caution, and more research is required concerning possible clinical use of this technique. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/921513 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT susanmarynewich slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures AT loriennemjenstad slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures AT davidrstapells slowcorticalpotentialsandamplificationpartin1p2measures |
_version_ |
1725404123937898496 |