Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS)
Abstract Imperfect detection is an important problem when counting wildlife, but new technologies such as unmanned aerial systems (UAS) can help overcome this obstacle. We used data collected by a UAS and a Bayesian closed capture-mark-recapture model to estimate abundance and distribution while acc...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Publishing Group
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92437-z |
id |
doaj-23affbbb32a648be9014d8fb90e57d9b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-23affbbb32a648be9014d8fb90e57d9b2021-06-27T11:30:54ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-0111111210.1038/s41598-021-92437-zMonitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS)Holly H. Edwards0Jeffrey A. Hostetler1Bradley M. Stith2Julien Martin3Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research InstituteFlorida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research InstituteIndependent ResearcherU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research CenterAbstract Imperfect detection is an important problem when counting wildlife, but new technologies such as unmanned aerial systems (UAS) can help overcome this obstacle. We used data collected by a UAS and a Bayesian closed capture-mark-recapture model to estimate abundance and distribution while accounting for imperfect detection of aggregated Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) at thermal refuges to assess use of current and new warmwater sources in winter. Our UAS hovered for 10 min and recorded 4 K video over sites in Collier County, FL. Open-source software was used to create recapture histories for 10- and 6-min time periods. Mean estimates of probability of detection for 1-min intervals at each canal varied by survey and ranged between 0.05 and 0.92. Overall, detection probability for sites varied between 0.62 and 1.00 across surveys and length of video (6 and 10 min). Abundance varied by survey and location, and estimates indicated that distribution changed over time, with use of the novel source of warmwater increasing over time. The highest cumulative estimate occurred in the coldest winter, 2018 (N = 158, CI 141–190). Methods here reduced survey costs, increased safety and obtained rigorous abundance estimates at aggregation sites previously too difficult to monitor.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92437-z |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Holly H. Edwards Jeffrey A. Hostetler Bradley M. Stith Julien Martin |
spellingShingle |
Holly H. Edwards Jeffrey A. Hostetler Bradley M. Stith Julien Martin Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS) Scientific Reports |
author_facet |
Holly H. Edwards Jeffrey A. Hostetler Bradley M. Stith Julien Martin |
author_sort |
Holly H. Edwards |
title |
Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS) |
title_short |
Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS) |
title_full |
Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS) |
title_fullStr |
Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS) |
title_sort |
monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (uas) |
publisher |
Nature Publishing Group |
series |
Scientific Reports |
issn |
2045-2322 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Abstract Imperfect detection is an important problem when counting wildlife, but new technologies such as unmanned aerial systems (UAS) can help overcome this obstacle. We used data collected by a UAS and a Bayesian closed capture-mark-recapture model to estimate abundance and distribution while accounting for imperfect detection of aggregated Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) at thermal refuges to assess use of current and new warmwater sources in winter. Our UAS hovered for 10 min and recorded 4 K video over sites in Collier County, FL. Open-source software was used to create recapture histories for 10- and 6-min time periods. Mean estimates of probability of detection for 1-min intervals at each canal varied by survey and ranged between 0.05 and 0.92. Overall, detection probability for sites varied between 0.62 and 1.00 across surveys and length of video (6 and 10 min). Abundance varied by survey and location, and estimates indicated that distribution changed over time, with use of the novel source of warmwater increasing over time. The highest cumulative estimate occurred in the coldest winter, 2018 (N = 158, CI 141–190). Methods here reduced survey costs, increased safety and obtained rigorous abundance estimates at aggregation sites previously too difficult to monitor. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92437-z |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hollyhedwards monitoringabundanceofaggregatedanimalsfloridamanateesusinganunmannedaerialsystemuas AT jeffreyahostetler monitoringabundanceofaggregatedanimalsfloridamanateesusinganunmannedaerialsystemuas AT bradleymstith monitoringabundanceofaggregatedanimalsfloridamanateesusinganunmannedaerialsystemuas AT julienmartin monitoringabundanceofaggregatedanimalsfloridamanateesusinganunmannedaerialsystemuas |
_version_ |
1721357733623496704 |