Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS)

Abstract Imperfect detection is an important problem when counting wildlife, but new technologies such as unmanned aerial systems (UAS) can help overcome this obstacle. We used data collected by a UAS and a Bayesian closed capture-mark-recapture model to estimate abundance and distribution while acc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Holly H. Edwards, Jeffrey A. Hostetler, Bradley M. Stith, Julien Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-06-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92437-z
id doaj-23affbbb32a648be9014d8fb90e57d9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23affbbb32a648be9014d8fb90e57d9b2021-06-27T11:30:54ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-06-0111111210.1038/s41598-021-92437-zMonitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS)Holly H. Edwards0Jeffrey A. Hostetler1Bradley M. Stith2Julien Martin3Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research InstituteFlorida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Fish and Wildlife Research InstituteIndependent ResearcherU.S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research CenterAbstract Imperfect detection is an important problem when counting wildlife, but new technologies such as unmanned aerial systems (UAS) can help overcome this obstacle. We used data collected by a UAS and a Bayesian closed capture-mark-recapture model to estimate abundance and distribution while accounting for imperfect detection of aggregated Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) at thermal refuges to assess use of current and new warmwater sources in winter. Our UAS hovered for 10 min and recorded 4 K video over sites in Collier County, FL. Open-source software was used to create recapture histories for 10- and 6-min time periods. Mean estimates of probability of detection for 1-min intervals at each canal varied by survey and ranged between 0.05 and 0.92. Overall, detection probability for sites varied between 0.62 and 1.00 across surveys and length of video (6 and 10 min). Abundance varied by survey and location, and estimates indicated that distribution changed over time, with use of the novel source of warmwater increasing over time. The highest cumulative estimate occurred in the coldest winter, 2018 (N = 158, CI 141–190). Methods here reduced survey costs, increased safety and obtained rigorous abundance estimates at aggregation sites previously too difficult to monitor.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92437-z
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Holly H. Edwards
Jeffrey A. Hostetler
Bradley M. Stith
Julien Martin
spellingShingle Holly H. Edwards
Jeffrey A. Hostetler
Bradley M. Stith
Julien Martin
Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS)
Scientific Reports
author_facet Holly H. Edwards
Jeffrey A. Hostetler
Bradley M. Stith
Julien Martin
author_sort Holly H. Edwards
title Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS)
title_short Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS)
title_full Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS)
title_fullStr Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS)
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (Florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (UAS)
title_sort monitoring abundance of aggregated animals (florida manatees) using an unmanned aerial system (uas)
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Imperfect detection is an important problem when counting wildlife, but new technologies such as unmanned aerial systems (UAS) can help overcome this obstacle. We used data collected by a UAS and a Bayesian closed capture-mark-recapture model to estimate abundance and distribution while accounting for imperfect detection of aggregated Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) at thermal refuges to assess use of current and new warmwater sources in winter. Our UAS hovered for 10 min and recorded 4 K video over sites in Collier County, FL. Open-source software was used to create recapture histories for 10- and 6-min time periods. Mean estimates of probability of detection for 1-min intervals at each canal varied by survey and ranged between 0.05 and 0.92. Overall, detection probability for sites varied between 0.62 and 1.00 across surveys and length of video (6 and 10 min). Abundance varied by survey and location, and estimates indicated that distribution changed over time, with use of the novel source of warmwater increasing over time. The highest cumulative estimate occurred in the coldest winter, 2018 (N = 158, CI 141–190). Methods here reduced survey costs, increased safety and obtained rigorous abundance estimates at aggregation sites previously too difficult to monitor.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92437-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hollyhedwards monitoringabundanceofaggregatedanimalsfloridamanateesusinganunmannedaerialsystemuas
AT jeffreyahostetler monitoringabundanceofaggregatedanimalsfloridamanateesusinganunmannedaerialsystemuas
AT bradleymstith monitoringabundanceofaggregatedanimalsfloridamanateesusinganunmannedaerialsystemuas
AT julienmartin monitoringabundanceofaggregatedanimalsfloridamanateesusinganunmannedaerialsystemuas
_version_ 1721357733623496704