Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans

Abstract Background Deep breast pain during lactation, with or without accompanying nipple pain and soreness continues to be anecdotally linked to infection by Candia albicans despite lack of robust evidence in the literature that Candida albicans is the cause of women’s breast symptoms. Methods A c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kirsti Kaski, Linda J. Kvist
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-06-01
Series:International Breastfeeding Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13006-018-0167-8
id doaj-2396d4c063b6449a8baa36efe05a8ba9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2396d4c063b6449a8baa36efe05a8ba92020-11-24T20:57:18ZengBMCInternational Breastfeeding Journal1746-43582018-06-011311910.1186/s13006-018-0167-8Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicansKirsti Kaski0Linda J. Kvist1Deparment for Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Helsingborg HospitalHealth Sciences Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Lund UniversityAbstract Background Deep breast pain during lactation, with or without accompanying nipple pain and soreness continues to be anecdotally linked to infection by Candia albicans despite lack of robust evidence in the literature that Candida albicans is the cause of women’s breast symptoms. Methods A case-control study of breastfeeding women in Sweden with (n 35) and without (n 35) symptoms that may be attributable to Candida albicans was carried out. The symptoms were radiating, burning and penetrating or non-penetrating breast pain with or without associated nipple pain during or after breastfeeding. The primary aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that breastfeeding women with symptoms commonly associated with Candida albicans infection will have a growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk significantly more often than women without these symptoms. A secondary aim was comparison of breastfeeding self-efficacy, measured by the BSES-SF (Breastfeeding Self Efficacy Scale –Short Form), between cases and controls. Results None of the women in the control group and eight of the women in the case group showed a growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk (p <  0.01), which confirms the hypothesis. There were no statistically significant differences in severity or type of symptoms between those in the case group with and without growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk. Results of the BSES-SF measurement showed no statistically significant differences between cases and controls. However, when analyses were stratified for parity, multiparous controls showed statistically significant higher scores for breastfeeding self-efficacy than multiparous cases. Conclusions Neither clinical symptoms nor microbial cultivation appear to be reliable means for making a diagnosis of Candida albicans infection of the breast. Skilled breastfeeding consultants should offer support and help with positioning, attachment and identification of physical impediments to successful breastfeeding. Professionals should be aware that it is possible that uncertainty in the breastfeeding situation may to some extent account for mothers’ breast symptoms. The ISRCTN (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number) identity for this case-control study is ISRCTN88839993. The study was retrospectively registered on 30 November 2016.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13006-018-0167-8Breast milkCandida albicansDeep breast painBreastfeedingBreastfeeding self-efficacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kirsti Kaski
Linda J. Kvist
spellingShingle Kirsti Kaski
Linda J. Kvist
Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
International Breastfeeding Journal
Breast milk
Candida albicans
Deep breast pain
Breastfeeding
Breastfeeding self-efficacy
author_facet Kirsti Kaski
Linda J. Kvist
author_sort Kirsti Kaski
title Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title_short Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title_full Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title_fullStr Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title_full_unstemmed Deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in Sweden investigating the role of Candida albicans
title_sort deep breast pain during lactation: a case-control study in sweden investigating the role of candida albicans
publisher BMC
series International Breastfeeding Journal
issn 1746-4358
publishDate 2018-06-01
description Abstract Background Deep breast pain during lactation, with or without accompanying nipple pain and soreness continues to be anecdotally linked to infection by Candia albicans despite lack of robust evidence in the literature that Candida albicans is the cause of women’s breast symptoms. Methods A case-control study of breastfeeding women in Sweden with (n 35) and without (n 35) symptoms that may be attributable to Candida albicans was carried out. The symptoms were radiating, burning and penetrating or non-penetrating breast pain with or without associated nipple pain during or after breastfeeding. The primary aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that breastfeeding women with symptoms commonly associated with Candida albicans infection will have a growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk significantly more often than women without these symptoms. A secondary aim was comparison of breastfeeding self-efficacy, measured by the BSES-SF (Breastfeeding Self Efficacy Scale –Short Form), between cases and controls. Results None of the women in the control group and eight of the women in the case group showed a growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk (p <  0.01), which confirms the hypothesis. There were no statistically significant differences in severity or type of symptoms between those in the case group with and without growth of Candida albicans in their breast milk. Results of the BSES-SF measurement showed no statistically significant differences between cases and controls. However, when analyses were stratified for parity, multiparous controls showed statistically significant higher scores for breastfeeding self-efficacy than multiparous cases. Conclusions Neither clinical symptoms nor microbial cultivation appear to be reliable means for making a diagnosis of Candida albicans infection of the breast. Skilled breastfeeding consultants should offer support and help with positioning, attachment and identification of physical impediments to successful breastfeeding. Professionals should be aware that it is possible that uncertainty in the breastfeeding situation may to some extent account for mothers’ breast symptoms. The ISRCTN (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number) identity for this case-control study is ISRCTN88839993. The study was retrospectively registered on 30 November 2016.
topic Breast milk
Candida albicans
Deep breast pain
Breastfeeding
Breastfeeding self-efficacy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13006-018-0167-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kirstikaski deepbreastpainduringlactationacasecontrolstudyinswedeninvestigatingtheroleofcandidaalbicans
AT lindajkvist deepbreastpainduringlactationacasecontrolstudyinswedeninvestigatingtheroleofcandidaalbicans
_version_ 1716788151492542464