A concept of Bayesian regulation in fisheries management.

Stochastic variability of biological processes and uncertainty of stock properties compel fisheries managers to look for tools to improve control over the stock. Inspired by animals exploiting hidden prey, we have taken a biomimetic approach combining catch and effort in a concept of Bayesian regula...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Noél Michael André Holmgren, Niclas Norrström, Robert Aps, Sakari Kuikka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4218784?pdf=render
id doaj-2395fa22569345b9a390f58d5ecbfb95
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2395fa22569345b9a390f58d5ecbfb952020-11-25T02:32:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01911e11161410.1371/journal.pone.0111614A concept of Bayesian regulation in fisheries management.Noél Michael André HolmgrenNiclas NorrströmRobert ApsSakari KuikkaStochastic variability of biological processes and uncertainty of stock properties compel fisheries managers to look for tools to improve control over the stock. Inspired by animals exploiting hidden prey, we have taken a biomimetic approach combining catch and effort in a concept of Bayesian regulation (BR). The BR provides a real-time Bayesian stock estimate, and can operate without separate stock assessment. We compared the performance of BR with catch-only regulation (CR), alternatively operating with N-target (the stock size giving maximum sustainable yield, MSY) and F-target (the fishing mortality giving MSY) on a stock model of Baltic Sea herring. N-targeted BR gave 3% higher yields than F-targeted BR and CR, and 7% higher yields than N-targeted CR. The BRs reduced coefficient of variance (CV) in fishing mortality compared to CR by 99.6% (from 25.2 to 0.1) when operated with F-target, and by about 80% (from 158.4 to 68.4/70.1 depending on how the prior is set) in stock size when operated with N-target. Even though F-targeted fishery reduced CV in pre-harvest stock size by 19-22%, it increased the dominant period length of population fluctuations from 20 to 60-80 years. In contrast, N-targeted BR made the periodic variation more similar to white noise. We discuss the conditions when BRs can be suitable tools to achieve sustainable yields while minimizing undesirable fluctuations in stock size or fishing effort.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4218784?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Noél Michael André Holmgren
Niclas Norrström
Robert Aps
Sakari Kuikka
spellingShingle Noél Michael André Holmgren
Niclas Norrström
Robert Aps
Sakari Kuikka
A concept of Bayesian regulation in fisheries management.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Noél Michael André Holmgren
Niclas Norrström
Robert Aps
Sakari Kuikka
author_sort Noél Michael André Holmgren
title A concept of Bayesian regulation in fisheries management.
title_short A concept of Bayesian regulation in fisheries management.
title_full A concept of Bayesian regulation in fisheries management.
title_fullStr A concept of Bayesian regulation in fisheries management.
title_full_unstemmed A concept of Bayesian regulation in fisheries management.
title_sort concept of bayesian regulation in fisheries management.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Stochastic variability of biological processes and uncertainty of stock properties compel fisheries managers to look for tools to improve control over the stock. Inspired by animals exploiting hidden prey, we have taken a biomimetic approach combining catch and effort in a concept of Bayesian regulation (BR). The BR provides a real-time Bayesian stock estimate, and can operate without separate stock assessment. We compared the performance of BR with catch-only regulation (CR), alternatively operating with N-target (the stock size giving maximum sustainable yield, MSY) and F-target (the fishing mortality giving MSY) on a stock model of Baltic Sea herring. N-targeted BR gave 3% higher yields than F-targeted BR and CR, and 7% higher yields than N-targeted CR. The BRs reduced coefficient of variance (CV) in fishing mortality compared to CR by 99.6% (from 25.2 to 0.1) when operated with F-target, and by about 80% (from 158.4 to 68.4/70.1 depending on how the prior is set) in stock size when operated with N-target. Even though F-targeted fishery reduced CV in pre-harvest stock size by 19-22%, it increased the dominant period length of population fluctuations from 20 to 60-80 years. In contrast, N-targeted BR made the periodic variation more similar to white noise. We discuss the conditions when BRs can be suitable tools to achieve sustainable yields while minimizing undesirable fluctuations in stock size or fishing effort.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4218784?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT noelmichaelandreholmgren aconceptofbayesianregulationinfisheriesmanagement
AT niclasnorrstrom aconceptofbayesianregulationinfisheriesmanagement
AT robertaps aconceptofbayesianregulationinfisheriesmanagement
AT sakarikuikka aconceptofbayesianregulationinfisheriesmanagement
AT noelmichaelandreholmgren conceptofbayesianregulationinfisheriesmanagement
AT niclasnorrstrom conceptofbayesianregulationinfisheriesmanagement
AT robertaps conceptofbayesianregulationinfisheriesmanagement
AT sakarikuikka conceptofbayesianregulationinfisheriesmanagement
_version_ 1724818564184014848