Evaluating Features of Search in Online Databases of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Central Library Website according to International Criteria
• Introduction: Database evaluation indicators include management, content, technical, and search indicators. A database must have a high level of information retrieval. As search features is one of the most important factors in database evaluation, this research tried to evaluate search input and o...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Vesnu Publications
2012-06-01
|
Series: | مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت |
Online Access: | http://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/617 |
id |
doaj-238a344a1db945698b0df7504e972afc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-238a344a1db945698b0df7504e972afc2020-11-25T00:16:20ZfasVesnu Publications مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت1735-78531735-98132012-06-0192356Evaluating Features of Search in Online Databases of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Central Library Website according to International CriteriaShahin Mojiri0Fariba Rakhsh1Ali Reza Rahimi2MSc, Library and Information Sciences, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranMSc, Medical Library and Information Sciences, Health Information Technology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranLecturer, Library and Information Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran• Introduction: Database evaluation indicators include management, content, technical, and search indicators. A database must have a high level of information retrieval. As search features is one of the most important factors in database evaluation, this research tried to evaluate search input and output in online databases of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) central library website based on international standards. • Methods: In a cross-sectional study in 2007-08, 7 online databases of IUMS central library website were included. Search input and output were evaluated by a researcher-made checklist according to Maryland K-12 and Ovid criteria, database management system (DBMS), and Gulliver assessment tool. The reliability of that the checklist was approved by professionals. The checklist consisted of 2 parts, 11 items to assess search input features and 15 items to evaluate search output features. The collected data was finally analyzed in Microsoft Excel. • Results: Our results showed that input and output features of Ovid databases were completely (100%) according to the standard criteria. However, MD Consult had the lowest (input: 51.52% and output: 61.9%) concordance with the standards. Although other databases. • Conclusion: Ovid and MD Consult had the highest and lowest concordance with search standards, respectively. Although other databases had acceptable concordance, decisions to continue or discontinue using their services depend on further evaluations of their management, content, and technical features. • Keywords: Databases, Factual; Reference Standards; Evaluation Studies; Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.http://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/617 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fas |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shahin Mojiri Fariba Rakhsh Ali Reza Rahimi |
spellingShingle |
Shahin Mojiri Fariba Rakhsh Ali Reza Rahimi Evaluating Features of Search in Online Databases of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Central Library Website according to International Criteria مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت |
author_facet |
Shahin Mojiri Fariba Rakhsh Ali Reza Rahimi |
author_sort |
Shahin Mojiri |
title |
Evaluating Features of Search in Online Databases of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Central Library Website according to International Criteria |
title_short |
Evaluating Features of Search in Online Databases of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Central Library Website according to International Criteria |
title_full |
Evaluating Features of Search in Online Databases of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Central Library Website according to International Criteria |
title_fullStr |
Evaluating Features of Search in Online Databases of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Central Library Website according to International Criteria |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluating Features of Search in Online Databases of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Central Library Website according to International Criteria |
title_sort |
evaluating features of search in online databases of isfahan university of medical sciences central library website according to international criteria |
publisher |
Vesnu Publications |
series |
مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت |
issn |
1735-7853 1735-9813 |
publishDate |
2012-06-01 |
description |
• Introduction: Database evaluation indicators include management, content, technical, and search indicators. A database must have a high level of information retrieval. As search features is one of the most important factors in database evaluation, this research tried to evaluate search input and output in online databases of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) central library website based on international standards.
• Methods: In a cross-sectional study in 2007-08, 7 online databases of IUMS central library website were included. Search input and output were evaluated by a researcher-made checklist according to Maryland K-12 and Ovid criteria, database management system (DBMS), and Gulliver assessment tool. The reliability of that the checklist was approved by professionals. The checklist consisted of 2 parts, 11 items to assess search input features and 15 items to evaluate search output features. The collected data was finally analyzed in Microsoft Excel.
• Results: Our results showed that input and output features of Ovid databases were completely (100%) according to the standard criteria. However, MD Consult had the lowest (input: 51.52% and output: 61.9%) concordance with the standards. Although other databases.
• Conclusion: Ovid and MD Consult had the highest and lowest concordance with search standards, respectively. Although other databases had acceptable concordance, decisions to continue or discontinue using their services depend on further evaluations of their management, content, and technical features.
• Keywords: Databases, Factual; Reference Standards; Evaluation Studies; Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. |
url |
http://him.mui.ac.ir/index.php/him/article/view/617 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shahinmojiri evaluatingfeaturesofsearchinonlinedatabasesofisfahanuniversityofmedicalsciencescentrallibrarywebsiteaccordingtointernationalcriteria AT faribarakhsh evaluatingfeaturesofsearchinonlinedatabasesofisfahanuniversityofmedicalsciencescentrallibrarywebsiteaccordingtointernationalcriteria AT alirezarahimi evaluatingfeaturesofsearchinonlinedatabasesofisfahanuniversityofmedicalsciencescentrallibrarywebsiteaccordingtointernationalcriteria |
_version_ |
1725383132874539008 |