Ogranichitel'nye mery ES v otnoshenii Rossii: pravovaja priroda i problema implementacii

The author proposes his take on the EU sanctions against Russia. He aims to understand the legal nature of the EU restrictions, the exact procedure of their implementation, revision, and repeal, as well as their judicial review. To this end, he proposes a system of sanction classification, analyses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Voinikov V.
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University 2015-02-01
Series:Baltijskij Region
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/537/%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%20%D0%92.%20%D0%92._89-100.pdf
id doaj-23575d259da948cd8668c9d28f487e74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23575d259da948cd8668c9d28f487e742020-11-24T23:37:28ZrusImmanuel Kant Baltic Federal UniversityBaltijskij Region2074-98482015-02-0118910010.5922/2074-9848-2015-1-5Ogranichitel'nye mery ES v otnoshenii Rossii: pravovaja priroda i problema implementaciiVoinikov V. The author proposes his take on the EU sanctions against Russia. He aims to understand the legal nature of the EU restrictions, the exact procedure of their implementation, revision, and repeal, as well as their judicial review. To this end, he proposes a system of sanction classification, analyses current EU legislation on the imposition and implementation of sanctions, as well as the case law on the sanction policy. The author also examines EU sanctions imposed on other countries and compares them to the Russian ones. He thus comes up with the following classification of sanctions against Russia: individual sanctions, those targeted at Crimea and Sevastopol, and anti-Russian economic sanctions. He concludes that the EU sanctions against Russia are inconsistent with the legal nature of restrictive measures, since they are a punishment rather than a policy tool. The author believes that in the current political conditions it may be difficult for the European Union to reach a unanimous agreement to repeal or prolong the sanctions. This article is inspired by the discussions that took place during the international conference “Russia and the EU: the Question of Trust” held in Luxembourg on November, 28—29 (2014).http://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/537/%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%20%D0%92.%20%D0%92._89-100.pdfRussiaEuropean Unionrestrictive measuressanctions
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Voinikov V.
spellingShingle Voinikov V.
Ogranichitel'nye mery ES v otnoshenii Rossii: pravovaja priroda i problema implementacii
Baltijskij Region
Russia
European Union
restrictive measures
sanctions
author_facet Voinikov V.
author_sort Voinikov V.
title Ogranichitel'nye mery ES v otnoshenii Rossii: pravovaja priroda i problema implementacii
title_short Ogranichitel'nye mery ES v otnoshenii Rossii: pravovaja priroda i problema implementacii
title_full Ogranichitel'nye mery ES v otnoshenii Rossii: pravovaja priroda i problema implementacii
title_fullStr Ogranichitel'nye mery ES v otnoshenii Rossii: pravovaja priroda i problema implementacii
title_full_unstemmed Ogranichitel'nye mery ES v otnoshenii Rossii: pravovaja priroda i problema implementacii
title_sort ogranichitel'nye mery es v otnoshenii rossii: pravovaja priroda i problema implementacii
publisher Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
series Baltijskij Region
issn 2074-9848
publishDate 2015-02-01
description The author proposes his take on the EU sanctions against Russia. He aims to understand the legal nature of the EU restrictions, the exact procedure of their implementation, revision, and repeal, as well as their judicial review. To this end, he proposes a system of sanction classification, analyses current EU legislation on the imposition and implementation of sanctions, as well as the case law on the sanction policy. The author also examines EU sanctions imposed on other countries and compares them to the Russian ones. He thus comes up with the following classification of sanctions against Russia: individual sanctions, those targeted at Crimea and Sevastopol, and anti-Russian economic sanctions. He concludes that the EU sanctions against Russia are inconsistent with the legal nature of restrictive measures, since they are a punishment rather than a policy tool. The author believes that in the current political conditions it may be difficult for the European Union to reach a unanimous agreement to repeal or prolong the sanctions. This article is inspired by the discussions that took place during the international conference “Russia and the EU: the Question of Trust” held in Luxembourg on November, 28—29 (2014).
topic Russia
European Union
restrictive measures
sanctions
url http://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/537/%D0%92%D0%BE%D0%B9%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%20%D0%92.%20%D0%92._89-100.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT voinikovv ogranichitelnyemeryesvotnosheniirossiipravovajaprirodaiproblemaimplementacii
_version_ 1725519832579833856