Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011

Introduction. Although increasing access to family planning has been an important part of the global development agenda, millions of women continue to face unmet need for contraception. Materials and Methods. We analyzed data from a repeated cross-sectional community survey conducted in Lusaka, Zamb...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nancy L. Hancock, Carla J. Chibwesha, Marie C. D. Stoner, Bellington Vwalika, Sujit D. Rathod, Margaret Phiri Kasaro, Elizabeth M. Stringer, Jeffrey S. A. Stringer, Benjamin H. Chi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/521928
id doaj-23434d8b695f459ebffe6c2812afd02b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23434d8b695f459ebffe6c2812afd02b2020-11-24T21:34:56ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412015-01-01201510.1155/2015/521928521928Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011Nancy L. Hancock0Carla J. Chibwesha1Marie C. D. Stoner2Bellington Vwalika3Sujit D. Rathod4Margaret Phiri Kasaro5Elizabeth M. Stringer6Jeffrey S. A. Stringer7Benjamin H. Chi8Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 3009 Old Clinic Building, Campus Box 7570, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7570, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 3009 Old Clinic Building, Campus Box 7570, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7570, USADepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina School of Public Health, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB No. 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Teaching Hospital, P.O. Box 50110, Lusaka, ZambiaDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E7HT, UKDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 3009 Old Clinic Building, Campus Box 7570, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7570, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 3009 Old Clinic Building, Campus Box 7570, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7570, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 3009 Old Clinic Building, Campus Box 7570, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7570, USADepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 3009 Old Clinic Building, Campus Box 7570, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7570, USAIntroduction. Although increasing access to family planning has been an important part of the global development agenda, millions of women continue to face unmet need for contraception. Materials and Methods. We analyzed data from a repeated cross-sectional community survey conducted in Lusaka, Zambia, over an eight-year period. We described prevalence of modern contraceptive use, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), among female heads of household aged 16–50 years. We also identified predictors of LARC versus short-term contraceptive use among women using modern methods. Results and Discussion. Twelve survey rounds were completed between November 2004 and September 2011. Among 29,476 eligible respondents, 17,605 (60%) reported using modern contraception. Oral contraceptive pills remained the most popular method over time, but use of LARC increased significantly, from less than 1% in 2004 to 9% by 2011 (p<0.001). Younger women (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.61) and women with lower levels of education (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.89) were less likely to report LARC use compared to women using short-term modern methods. Conclusions. Population-based assessments of contraceptive use over time can guide programs and policies. To achieve reproductive health equity and reduce unmet contraceptive need, future efforts to increase LARC use should focus on young women and those with less education.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/521928
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nancy L. Hancock
Carla J. Chibwesha
Marie C. D. Stoner
Bellington Vwalika
Sujit D. Rathod
Margaret Phiri Kasaro
Elizabeth M. Stringer
Jeffrey S. A. Stringer
Benjamin H. Chi
spellingShingle Nancy L. Hancock
Carla J. Chibwesha
Marie C. D. Stoner
Bellington Vwalika
Sujit D. Rathod
Margaret Phiri Kasaro
Elizabeth M. Stringer
Jeffrey S. A. Stringer
Benjamin H. Chi
Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
BioMed Research International
author_facet Nancy L. Hancock
Carla J. Chibwesha
Marie C. D. Stoner
Bellington Vwalika
Sujit D. Rathod
Margaret Phiri Kasaro
Elizabeth M. Stringer
Jeffrey S. A. Stringer
Benjamin H. Chi
author_sort Nancy L. Hancock
title Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title_short Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title_full Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title_fullStr Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title_full_unstemmed Temporal Trends and Predictors of Modern Contraceptive Use in Lusaka, Zambia, 2004–2011
title_sort temporal trends and predictors of modern contraceptive use in lusaka, zambia, 2004–2011
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Introduction. Although increasing access to family planning has been an important part of the global development agenda, millions of women continue to face unmet need for contraception. Materials and Methods. We analyzed data from a repeated cross-sectional community survey conducted in Lusaka, Zambia, over an eight-year period. We described prevalence of modern contraceptive use, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), among female heads of household aged 16–50 years. We also identified predictors of LARC versus short-term contraceptive use among women using modern methods. Results and Discussion. Twelve survey rounds were completed between November 2004 and September 2011. Among 29,476 eligible respondents, 17,605 (60%) reported using modern contraception. Oral contraceptive pills remained the most popular method over time, but use of LARC increased significantly, from less than 1% in 2004 to 9% by 2011 (p<0.001). Younger women (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34, 0.61) and women with lower levels of education (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.89) were less likely to report LARC use compared to women using short-term modern methods. Conclusions. Population-based assessments of contraceptive use over time can guide programs and policies. To achieve reproductive health equity and reduce unmet contraceptive need, future efforts to increase LARC use should focus on young women and those with less education.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/521928
work_keys_str_mv AT nancylhancock temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT carlajchibwesha temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT mariecdstoner temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT bellingtonvwalika temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT sujitdrathod temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT margaretphirikasaro temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT elizabethmstringer temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT jeffreysastringer temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
AT benjaminhchi temporaltrendsandpredictorsofmoderncontraceptiveuseinlusakazambia20042011
_version_ 1725947365276254208