Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719 |
id |
doaj-2342431734b94836bc84c0f9883b97d2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2342431734b94836bc84c0f9883b97d22021-03-03T10:41:11ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being1748-26231748-26312021-01-0116110.1080/17482631.2020.18617191861719Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview studyPaul Enthoven0Fredrik Eddeborn1Allan Abbott2Karin Schröder3Maria Fors4Birgitta Öberg5Linköping UniversityLinköping UniversityLinköping UniversityLinköping UniversityLinköping UniversityLinköping UniversityPurpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months after receiving treatment according to the BetterBack MoC for LBP in primary care in Sweden. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results: When analysing the data, the following theme emerged; “Participant understanding of their treatment for low back pain and self-management strategies—a matter of support systems”, comprising the following categories: “Knowledge translation”, “Interaction and dialogue”, “The health care professional support” and “Form organization”. Participants experienced that they had better knowledge about their LBP and received tools to better manage their health condition. The participants expressed good communication with the treating physiotherapist and provided suggestions to further improve the treatment of LBP. Conclusions: Participants experienced that they had gained new knowledge about their health problems and after the treatment they had the tools to handle their back problems. This suggests that the BetterBack MoC may be used as a basis for a support system to provide valuable tools for self-management for patients with low back pain.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719low back painphysiotherapyqualitative interviewprimary carehealth care professionalseducationcommon-sense modelreassuranceself-managementself-efficacy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Paul Enthoven Fredrik Eddeborn Allan Abbott Karin Schröder Maria Fors Birgitta Öberg |
spellingShingle |
Paul Enthoven Fredrik Eddeborn Allan Abbott Karin Schröder Maria Fors Birgitta Öberg Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being low back pain physiotherapy qualitative interview primary care health care professionals education common-sense model reassurance self-management self-efficacy |
author_facet |
Paul Enthoven Fredrik Eddeborn Allan Abbott Karin Schröder Maria Fors Birgitta Öberg |
author_sort |
Paul Enthoven |
title |
Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title_short |
Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title_full |
Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title_fullStr |
Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
title_sort |
patients’ experiences of the betterback model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study |
publisher |
Taylor & Francis Group |
series |
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being |
issn |
1748-2623 1748-2631 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months after receiving treatment according to the BetterBack MoC for LBP in primary care in Sweden. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results: When analysing the data, the following theme emerged; “Participant understanding of their treatment for low back pain and self-management strategies—a matter of support systems”, comprising the following categories: “Knowledge translation”, “Interaction and dialogue”, “The health care professional support” and “Form organization”. Participants experienced that they had better knowledge about their LBP and received tools to better manage their health condition. The participants expressed good communication with the treating physiotherapist and provided suggestions to further improve the treatment of LBP. Conclusions: Participants experienced that they had gained new knowledge about their health problems and after the treatment they had the tools to handle their back problems. This suggests that the BetterBack MoC may be used as a basis for a support system to provide valuable tools for self-management for patients with low back pain. |
topic |
low back pain physiotherapy qualitative interview primary care health care professionals education common-sense model reassurance self-management self-efficacy |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT paulenthoven patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT fredrikeddeborn patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT allanabbott patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT karinschroder patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT mariafors patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy AT birgittaoberg patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy |
_version_ |
1724232977652645888 |