Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study

Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul Enthoven, Fredrik Eddeborn, Allan Abbott, Karin Schröder, Maria Fors, Birgitta Öberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719
id doaj-2342431734b94836bc84c0f9883b97d2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2342431734b94836bc84c0f9883b97d22021-03-03T10:41:11ZengTaylor & Francis GroupInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being1748-26231748-26312021-01-0116110.1080/17482631.2020.18617191861719Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview studyPaul Enthoven0Fredrik Eddeborn1Allan Abbott2Karin Schröder3Maria Fors4Birgitta Öberg5Linköping UniversityLinköping UniversityLinköping UniversityLinköping UniversityLinköping UniversityLinköping UniversityPurpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months after receiving treatment according to the BetterBack MoC for LBP in primary care in Sweden. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results: When analysing the data, the following theme emerged; “Participant understanding of their treatment for low back pain and self-management strategies—a matter of support systems”, comprising the following categories: “Knowledge translation”, “Interaction and dialogue”, “The health care professional support” and “Form organization”. Participants experienced that they had better knowledge about their LBP and received tools to better manage their health condition. The participants expressed good communication with the treating physiotherapist and provided suggestions to further improve the treatment of LBP. Conclusions: Participants experienced that they had gained new knowledge about their health problems and after the treatment they had the tools to handle their back problems. This suggests that the BetterBack MoC may be used as a basis for a support system to provide valuable tools for self-management for patients with low back pain.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719low back painphysiotherapyqualitative interviewprimary carehealth care professionalseducationcommon-sense modelreassuranceself-managementself-efficacy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul Enthoven
Fredrik Eddeborn
Allan Abbott
Karin Schröder
Maria Fors
Birgitta Öberg
spellingShingle Paul Enthoven
Fredrik Eddeborn
Allan Abbott
Karin Schröder
Maria Fors
Birgitta Öberg
Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
low back pain
physiotherapy
qualitative interview
primary care
health care professionals
education
common-sense model
reassurance
self-management
self-efficacy
author_facet Paul Enthoven
Fredrik Eddeborn
Allan Abbott
Karin Schröder
Maria Fors
Birgitta Öberg
author_sort Paul Enthoven
title Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title_short Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title_full Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title_fullStr Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ experiences of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
title_sort patients’ experiences of the betterback model of care for low back pain in primary care – a qualitative interview study
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health & Well-Being
issn 1748-2623
1748-2631
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Purpose: The aim of this study was to describe patient experiences of received primary care for low back pain (LBP) according to the BetterBack Model of Care (MoC) with a focus on illness beliefs and self-management enablement. Methods: Individual interviews were conducted with 15 adults 4–14 months after receiving treatment according to the BetterBack MoC for LBP in primary care in Sweden. Data were analysed using content analysis. Results: When analysing the data, the following theme emerged; “Participant understanding of their treatment for low back pain and self-management strategies—a matter of support systems”, comprising the following categories: “Knowledge translation”, “Interaction and dialogue”, “The health care professional support” and “Form organization”. Participants experienced that they had better knowledge about their LBP and received tools to better manage their health condition. The participants expressed good communication with the treating physiotherapist and provided suggestions to further improve the treatment of LBP. Conclusions: Participants experienced that they had gained new knowledge about their health problems and after the treatment they had the tools to handle their back problems. This suggests that the BetterBack MoC may be used as a basis for a support system to provide valuable tools for self-management for patients with low back pain.
topic low back pain
physiotherapy
qualitative interview
primary care
health care professionals
education
common-sense model
reassurance
self-management
self-efficacy
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2020.1861719
work_keys_str_mv AT paulenthoven patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT fredrikeddeborn patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT allanabbott patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT karinschroder patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT mariafors patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
AT birgittaoberg patientsexperiencesofthebetterbackmodelofcareforlowbackpaininprimarycareaqualitativeinterviewstudy
_version_ 1724232977652645888