Visual Field Advantage: Redefined by Training?

Visual Field Advantage: Redefined by Training?

Previc (1990) postulated that most peri-personal space interactions occurred in the lower visual field (LVF), leading to an advantage when compared to the upper visual field (UVF). It is not clear if extensive practice can affect the difference between interactions in the LVF/UVF. We tested male and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scott A. Stone, Jared Baker, Rob Olsen, Robbin Gibb, Jon Doan, Joshua Hoetmer, Claudia L. R. Gonzalez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
basketball athletes
visual fields
visual processing
movement time
athletic training
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02764/full
Description
Summary:Previc (1990) postulated that most peri-personal space interactions occurred in the lower visual field (LVF), leading to an advantage when compared to the upper visual field (UVF). It is not clear if extensive practice can affect the difference between interactions in the LVF/UVF. We tested male and female basketball varsity athletes and non-athletes on a DynaVision D2 visuomotor reaction task. We recruited basketball players because in their training they spend significant amount of time processing UVF information. We found a LVF advantage in all participants, but this advantage was significantly reduced in the athletes. The results suggest that training can be a powerful modulator of visuomotor function.
ISSN:1664-1078

Similar Items