Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale

Abstract Aim To develop the Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale. Design A multi‐phased approach was used. Methods An initial bank of items was created based on the authors' experience and clinical practice guidelines. An expert panel assessed content validity. Explorator...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aaron Conway, Kristina Chang, Navpreet Kamboj, Joanna Sutherland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-05-01
Series:Nursing Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.725
id doaj-2330db66bd5f4899849febcb339745ae
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2330db66bd5f4899849febcb339745ae2021-04-14T15:51:10ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582021-05-01831135114410.1002/nop2.725Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scaleAaron Conway0Kristina Chang1Navpreet Kamboj2Joanna Sutherland3Peter Munk Cardiac Centre University Health Network Toronto ON CanadaPeter Munk Cardiac Centre University Health Network Toronto ON CanadaLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto Toronto ON CanadaRural Clinical School University of New South Wales Coffs Harbour NSW AustraliaAbstract Aim To develop the Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale. Design A multi‐phased approach was used. Methods An initial bank of items was created based on the authors' experience and clinical practice guidelines. An expert panel assessed content validity. Exploratory factor analysis was used for item reduction and regression was used to explore construct validity. Responsiveness was evaluated using a pre‐test post‐test design. Results Criteria for content validity was met for 34 items. An 18‐item, three‐factor solution was identified from exploratory factor analysis performed using Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale scores from 228 nurses. Subscales accounted for 66% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha for the scale (0.95) and subscales was high (>0.85). There were differences (p < .001) in Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale scores relative to years of experience and work environment. NC‐MSCS scores increased significantly from before to after sedation training (mean difference = 31.8; 95% CI = 24.4–39; N = 31).https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.725conscious sedationdeep sedationitem response theorynursingpatient safetyscale development
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aaron Conway
Kristina Chang
Navpreet Kamboj
Joanna Sutherland
spellingShingle Aaron Conway
Kristina Chang
Navpreet Kamboj
Joanna Sutherland
Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale
Nursing Open
conscious sedation
deep sedation
item response theory
nursing
patient safety
scale development
author_facet Aaron Conway
Kristina Chang
Navpreet Kamboj
Joanna Sutherland
author_sort Aaron Conway
title Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale
title_short Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale
title_full Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale
title_fullStr Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale
title_sort development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale
publisher Wiley
series Nursing Open
issn 2054-1058
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Aim To develop the Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale. Design A multi‐phased approach was used. Methods An initial bank of items was created based on the authors' experience and clinical practice guidelines. An expert panel assessed content validity. Exploratory factor analysis was used for item reduction and regression was used to explore construct validity. Responsiveness was evaluated using a pre‐test post‐test design. Results Criteria for content validity was met for 34 items. An 18‐item, three‐factor solution was identified from exploratory factor analysis performed using Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale scores from 228 nurses. Subscales accounted for 66% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha for the scale (0.95) and subscales was high (>0.85). There were differences (p < .001) in Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale scores relative to years of experience and work environment. NC‐MSCS scores increased significantly from before to after sedation training (mean difference = 31.8; 95% CI = 24.4–39; N = 31).
topic conscious sedation
deep sedation
item response theory
nursing
patient safety
scale development
url https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.725
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronconway developmentandvalidationofthenursingconfidenceinmanagingsedationcomplicationsscale
AT kristinachang developmentandvalidationofthenursingconfidenceinmanagingsedationcomplicationsscale
AT navpreetkamboj developmentandvalidationofthenursingconfidenceinmanagingsedationcomplicationsscale
AT joannasutherland developmentandvalidationofthenursingconfidenceinmanagingsedationcomplicationsscale
_version_ 1721527122479022080