Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale
Abstract Aim To develop the Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale. Design A multi‐phased approach was used. Methods An initial bank of items was created based on the authors' experience and clinical practice guidelines. An expert panel assessed content validity. Explorator...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Nursing Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.725 |
id |
doaj-2330db66bd5f4899849febcb339745ae |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2330db66bd5f4899849febcb339745ae2021-04-14T15:51:10ZengWileyNursing Open2054-10582021-05-01831135114410.1002/nop2.725Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scaleAaron Conway0Kristina Chang1Navpreet Kamboj2Joanna Sutherland3Peter Munk Cardiac Centre University Health Network Toronto ON CanadaPeter Munk Cardiac Centre University Health Network Toronto ON CanadaLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto Toronto ON CanadaRural Clinical School University of New South Wales Coffs Harbour NSW AustraliaAbstract Aim To develop the Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale. Design A multi‐phased approach was used. Methods An initial bank of items was created based on the authors' experience and clinical practice guidelines. An expert panel assessed content validity. Exploratory factor analysis was used for item reduction and regression was used to explore construct validity. Responsiveness was evaluated using a pre‐test post‐test design. Results Criteria for content validity was met for 34 items. An 18‐item, three‐factor solution was identified from exploratory factor analysis performed using Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale scores from 228 nurses. Subscales accounted for 66% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha for the scale (0.95) and subscales was high (>0.85). There were differences (p < .001) in Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale scores relative to years of experience and work environment. NC‐MSCS scores increased significantly from before to after sedation training (mean difference = 31.8; 95% CI = 24.4–39; N = 31).https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.725conscious sedationdeep sedationitem response theorynursingpatient safetyscale development |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aaron Conway Kristina Chang Navpreet Kamboj Joanna Sutherland |
spellingShingle |
Aaron Conway Kristina Chang Navpreet Kamboj Joanna Sutherland Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale Nursing Open conscious sedation deep sedation item response theory nursing patient safety scale development |
author_facet |
Aaron Conway Kristina Chang Navpreet Kamboj Joanna Sutherland |
author_sort |
Aaron Conway |
title |
Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale |
title_short |
Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale |
title_full |
Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale |
title_fullStr |
Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale |
title_sort |
development and validation of the nursing confidence in managing sedation complications scale |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Nursing Open |
issn |
2054-1058 |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Aim To develop the Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale. Design A multi‐phased approach was used. Methods An initial bank of items was created based on the authors' experience and clinical practice guidelines. An expert panel assessed content validity. Exploratory factor analysis was used for item reduction and regression was used to explore construct validity. Responsiveness was evaluated using a pre‐test post‐test design. Results Criteria for content validity was met for 34 items. An 18‐item, three‐factor solution was identified from exploratory factor analysis performed using Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale scores from 228 nurses. Subscales accounted for 66% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha for the scale (0.95) and subscales was high (>0.85). There were differences (p < .001) in Nursing Confidence in Managing Sedation Complications Scale scores relative to years of experience and work environment. NC‐MSCS scores increased significantly from before to after sedation training (mean difference = 31.8; 95% CI = 24.4–39; N = 31). |
topic |
conscious sedation deep sedation item response theory nursing patient safety scale development |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.725 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aaronconway developmentandvalidationofthenursingconfidenceinmanagingsedationcomplicationsscale AT kristinachang developmentandvalidationofthenursingconfidenceinmanagingsedationcomplicationsscale AT navpreetkamboj developmentandvalidationofthenursingconfidenceinmanagingsedationcomplicationsscale AT joannasutherland developmentandvalidationofthenursingconfidenceinmanagingsedationcomplicationsscale |
_version_ |
1721527122479022080 |