A Monte Carlo-based framework for risk-return analysis in mineral prospectivity mapping

Quantification of a mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) heavily relies on geological, geophysical and geochemical analysis, which combines various evidence layers into a single map. However, MPM is subject to considerable uncertainty due to lack of understanding of the metallogenesis and limited spa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ziye Wang, Zhen Yin, Jef Caers, Renguang Zuo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-11-01
Series:Geoscience Frontiers
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987120300529
id doaj-231ece1f0431476d93598697d9169c9d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-231ece1f0431476d93598697d9169c9d2020-11-25T03:09:37ZengElsevierGeoscience Frontiers1674-98712020-11-0111622972308A Monte Carlo-based framework for risk-return analysis in mineral prospectivity mappingZiye Wang0Zhen Yin1Jef Caers2Renguang Zuo3State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, ChinaDepartment of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, California, 94305, USADepartment of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, California, 94305, USA; Corresponding author.State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, ChinaQuantification of a mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) heavily relies on geological, geophysical and geochemical analysis, which combines various evidence layers into a single map. However, MPM is subject to considerable uncertainty due to lack of understanding of the metallogenesis and limited spatial data samples. In this paper, we provide a framework that addresses how uncertainty in the evidence layers can be quantified and how such uncertainty is propagated to the prediction of mineral potential. More specifically, we use Monte Carlo simulation to jointly quantify uncertainties on all uncertain evidence variables, categorized into geological, geochemical and geophysical. On stochastically simulated sets of the multiple input layers, logistic regression is employed to produce different quantifications of the mineral potential in terms of probability. Uncertainties we address lie in the downscaling of magnetic data to a scale that makes such data comparable with known mineral deposits. Additionally, we deal with the limited spatial sampling of geochemistry that leads to spatial uncertainty. Next, we deal with the conceptual geological uncertainty related to how the spatial extent of the influence of evidential geological features such as faults, granite intrusions and sedimentary formations. Finally, we provide a novel way to interpret the established uncertainty in a risk-return analysis to decide areas with high potential but at the same time low uncertainty on that potential. Our methods are illustrated and compared with traditional deterministic MPM on a real case study of prospecting skarn Fe deposition in southwestern Fujian, China.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987120300529Uncertainty quantificationGeostatisticsMineral explorationRisk vs return
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ziye Wang
Zhen Yin
Jef Caers
Renguang Zuo
spellingShingle Ziye Wang
Zhen Yin
Jef Caers
Renguang Zuo
A Monte Carlo-based framework for risk-return analysis in mineral prospectivity mapping
Geoscience Frontiers
Uncertainty quantification
Geostatistics
Mineral exploration
Risk vs return
author_facet Ziye Wang
Zhen Yin
Jef Caers
Renguang Zuo
author_sort Ziye Wang
title A Monte Carlo-based framework for risk-return analysis in mineral prospectivity mapping
title_short A Monte Carlo-based framework for risk-return analysis in mineral prospectivity mapping
title_full A Monte Carlo-based framework for risk-return analysis in mineral prospectivity mapping
title_fullStr A Monte Carlo-based framework for risk-return analysis in mineral prospectivity mapping
title_full_unstemmed A Monte Carlo-based framework for risk-return analysis in mineral prospectivity mapping
title_sort monte carlo-based framework for risk-return analysis in mineral prospectivity mapping
publisher Elsevier
series Geoscience Frontiers
issn 1674-9871
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Quantification of a mineral prospectivity mapping (MPM) heavily relies on geological, geophysical and geochemical analysis, which combines various evidence layers into a single map. However, MPM is subject to considerable uncertainty due to lack of understanding of the metallogenesis and limited spatial data samples. In this paper, we provide a framework that addresses how uncertainty in the evidence layers can be quantified and how such uncertainty is propagated to the prediction of mineral potential. More specifically, we use Monte Carlo simulation to jointly quantify uncertainties on all uncertain evidence variables, categorized into geological, geochemical and geophysical. On stochastically simulated sets of the multiple input layers, logistic regression is employed to produce different quantifications of the mineral potential in terms of probability. Uncertainties we address lie in the downscaling of magnetic data to a scale that makes such data comparable with known mineral deposits. Additionally, we deal with the limited spatial sampling of geochemistry that leads to spatial uncertainty. Next, we deal with the conceptual geological uncertainty related to how the spatial extent of the influence of evidential geological features such as faults, granite intrusions and sedimentary formations. Finally, we provide a novel way to interpret the established uncertainty in a risk-return analysis to decide areas with high potential but at the same time low uncertainty on that potential. Our methods are illustrated and compared with traditional deterministic MPM on a real case study of prospecting skarn Fe deposition in southwestern Fujian, China.
topic Uncertainty quantification
Geostatistics
Mineral exploration
Risk vs return
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674987120300529
work_keys_str_mv AT ziyewang amontecarlobasedframeworkforriskreturnanalysisinmineralprospectivitymapping
AT zhenyin amontecarlobasedframeworkforriskreturnanalysisinmineralprospectivitymapping
AT jefcaers amontecarlobasedframeworkforriskreturnanalysisinmineralprospectivitymapping
AT renguangzuo amontecarlobasedframeworkforriskreturnanalysisinmineralprospectivitymapping
AT ziyewang montecarlobasedframeworkforriskreturnanalysisinmineralprospectivitymapping
AT zhenyin montecarlobasedframeworkforriskreturnanalysisinmineralprospectivitymapping
AT jefcaers montecarlobasedframeworkforriskreturnanalysisinmineralprospectivitymapping
AT renguangzuo montecarlobasedframeworkforriskreturnanalysisinmineralprospectivitymapping
_version_ 1724661519748169728