Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
It is well-known that statistical learning of visual symbol sequences occurs implicitly (Kim et al., 2009). Here, we examined whether people can learn the serial order of the visual symbols when they cannot perceive them. During the familiarization phase, triplets or quadruplets of novel symbols wer...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076/full |
id |
doaj-2310f26835ca420bab60fc802cfd449d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2310f26835ca420bab60fc802cfd449d2020-11-24T20:59:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-02-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076116543Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learningKaede eKido0Shogo eMakioka1Osaka prefecture universityOsaka prefecture universityIt is well-known that statistical learning of visual symbol sequences occurs implicitly (Kim et al., 2009). Here, we examined whether people can learn the serial order of the visual symbols when they cannot perceive them. During the familiarization phase, triplets or quadruplets of novel symbols were presented to one of the eyes under continuous flash suppression (CFS). Perception of the symbols was completely suppressed by the flash patterns presented to the other eye (binocular rivalry). In the test phase, the detection latency was faster for the symbols located later in the triplets or the quadruplets. These results indicate that serial order learning occurs even when the participants cannot perceive the stimuli. We also found that the detection became slower for the last item of the triplets or the quadruplets. This phenomenon occurred only when the participants were familiarized to the symbols under CFS, suggesting that the following symbols interfered with the processing for the target symbol when conscious perception was suppressed. We further examined the nature of the interference, and found that the interference occurred only when the following symbol was not fixed. This result suggests that serial order learning under binocular rivalry is restricted to the fixed order sequence. Statistical learning for the transition probability of the symbols might not occur when participants cannot perceive the symbols. We confirmed this hypothesis by conducting another experiment in which transition probability of the symbol sequence was manipulated.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076/fullstatistical learningBinocular Rivalrysubliminal processingSerial order learningContinuous Flash Suppression (CFS) |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kaede eKido Shogo eMakioka |
spellingShingle |
Kaede eKido Shogo eMakioka Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning Frontiers in Psychology statistical learning Binocular Rivalry subliminal processing Serial order learning Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) |
author_facet |
Kaede eKido Shogo eMakioka |
author_sort |
Kaede eKido |
title |
Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning |
title_short |
Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning |
title_full |
Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning |
title_fullStr |
Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning |
title_sort |
serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Psychology |
issn |
1664-1078 |
publishDate |
2015-02-01 |
description |
It is well-known that statistical learning of visual symbol sequences occurs implicitly (Kim et al., 2009). Here, we examined whether people can learn the serial order of the visual symbols when they cannot perceive them. During the familiarization phase, triplets or quadruplets of novel symbols were presented to one of the eyes under continuous flash suppression (CFS). Perception of the symbols was completely suppressed by the flash patterns presented to the other eye (binocular rivalry). In the test phase, the detection latency was faster for the symbols located later in the triplets or the quadruplets. These results indicate that serial order learning occurs even when the participants cannot perceive the stimuli. We also found that the detection became slower for the last item of the triplets or the quadruplets. This phenomenon occurred only when the participants were familiarized to the symbols under CFS, suggesting that the following symbols interfered with the processing for the target symbol when conscious perception was suppressed. We further examined the nature of the interference, and found that the interference occurred only when the following symbol was not fixed. This result suggests that serial order learning under binocular rivalry is restricted to the fixed order sequence. Statistical learning for the transition probability of the symbols might not occur when participants cannot perceive the symbols. We confirmed this hypothesis by conducting another experiment in which transition probability of the symbol sequence was manipulated. |
topic |
statistical learning Binocular Rivalry subliminal processing Serial order learning Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS) |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kaedeekido serialorderlearningofsubliminalvisualstimulievidenceofmultistagelearning AT shogoemakioka serialorderlearningofsubliminalvisualstimulievidenceofmultistagelearning |
_version_ |
1716782025050947584 |