Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning

It is well-known that statistical learning of visual symbol sequences occurs implicitly (Kim et al., 2009). Here, we examined whether people can learn the serial order of the visual symbols when they cannot perceive them. During the familiarization phase, triplets or quadruplets of novel symbols wer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaede eKido, Shogo eMakioka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076/full
id doaj-2310f26835ca420bab60fc802cfd449d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2310f26835ca420bab60fc802cfd449d2020-11-24T20:59:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-02-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076116543Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learningKaede eKido0Shogo eMakioka1Osaka prefecture universityOsaka prefecture universityIt is well-known that statistical learning of visual symbol sequences occurs implicitly (Kim et al., 2009). Here, we examined whether people can learn the serial order of the visual symbols when they cannot perceive them. During the familiarization phase, triplets or quadruplets of novel symbols were presented to one of the eyes under continuous flash suppression (CFS). Perception of the symbols was completely suppressed by the flash patterns presented to the other eye (binocular rivalry). In the test phase, the detection latency was faster for the symbols located later in the triplets or the quadruplets. These results indicate that serial order learning occurs even when the participants cannot perceive the stimuli. We also found that the detection became slower for the last item of the triplets or the quadruplets. This phenomenon occurred only when the participants were familiarized to the symbols under CFS, suggesting that the following symbols interfered with the processing for the target symbol when conscious perception was suppressed. We further examined the nature of the interference, and found that the interference occurred only when the following symbol was not fixed. This result suggests that serial order learning under binocular rivalry is restricted to the fixed order sequence. Statistical learning for the transition probability of the symbols might not occur when participants cannot perceive the symbols. We confirmed this hypothesis by conducting another experiment in which transition probability of the symbol sequence was manipulated.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076/fullstatistical learningBinocular Rivalrysubliminal processingSerial order learningContinuous Flash Suppression (CFS)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kaede eKido
Shogo eMakioka
spellingShingle Kaede eKido
Shogo eMakioka
Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
Frontiers in Psychology
statistical learning
Binocular Rivalry
subliminal processing
Serial order learning
Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS)
author_facet Kaede eKido
Shogo eMakioka
author_sort Kaede eKido
title Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title_short Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title_full Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title_fullStr Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title_full_unstemmed Serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
title_sort serial order learning of subliminal visual stimuli: evidence of multistage learning
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-02-01
description It is well-known that statistical learning of visual symbol sequences occurs implicitly (Kim et al., 2009). Here, we examined whether people can learn the serial order of the visual symbols when they cannot perceive them. During the familiarization phase, triplets or quadruplets of novel symbols were presented to one of the eyes under continuous flash suppression (CFS). Perception of the symbols was completely suppressed by the flash patterns presented to the other eye (binocular rivalry). In the test phase, the detection latency was faster for the symbols located later in the triplets or the quadruplets. These results indicate that serial order learning occurs even when the participants cannot perceive the stimuli. We also found that the detection became slower for the last item of the triplets or the quadruplets. This phenomenon occurred only when the participants were familiarized to the symbols under CFS, suggesting that the following symbols interfered with the processing for the target symbol when conscious perception was suppressed. We further examined the nature of the interference, and found that the interference occurred only when the following symbol was not fixed. This result suggests that serial order learning under binocular rivalry is restricted to the fixed order sequence. Statistical learning for the transition probability of the symbols might not occur when participants cannot perceive the symbols. We confirmed this hypothesis by conducting another experiment in which transition probability of the symbol sequence was manipulated.
topic statistical learning
Binocular Rivalry
subliminal processing
Serial order learning
Continuous Flash Suppression (CFS)
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00076/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kaedeekido serialorderlearningofsubliminalvisualstimulievidenceofmultistagelearning
AT shogoemakioka serialorderlearningofsubliminalvisualstimulievidenceofmultistagelearning
_version_ 1716782025050947584