Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details
After driving a familiar route, people often have a poor memory of the drive. To investigate how quickly people forget information from an everyday drive we asked participants (n = 38) to take a 20-min simulated drive on familiar local roads and after a delay, answer questions about what happened an...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198220300609 |
id |
doaj-23078916811d47f8acc5dd7bf9c8e273 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-23078916811d47f8acc5dd7bf9c8e2732020-11-25T03:19:27ZengElsevierTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives2590-19822020-07-016100149Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving detailsDevin S. Richards0Samuel G. Charlton1Transport Research Group, University of Waikato, New ZealandCorresponding author at: School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.; Transport Research Group, University of Waikato, New ZealandAfter driving a familiar route, people often have a poor memory of the drive. To investigate how quickly people forget information from an everyday drive we asked participants (n = 38) to take a 20-min simulated drive on familiar local roads and after a delay, answer questions about what happened and what they saw at four locations. We questioned drivers either immediately (<1 s), 20 s or 45 s after driving through each location, or at the end of the drive. Recall accuracy remained high when drivers were questioned immediately and at delays of 20 s and 45 s, but was significantly poorer when drivers were questioned at the end of the drive. Recall accuracy for stopping at a location did not decrease regardless of delay. The results add to our knowledge about the role of attention and memory for highly practised and largely automatic skills, such as everyday driving.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198220300609 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Devin S. Richards Samuel G. Charlton |
spellingShingle |
Devin S. Richards Samuel G. Charlton Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives |
author_facet |
Devin S. Richards Samuel G. Charlton |
author_sort |
Devin S. Richards |
title |
Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details |
title_short |
Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details |
title_full |
Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details |
title_fullStr |
Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details |
title_full_unstemmed |
Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details |
title_sort |
forgotten or never consciously processed? a comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives |
issn |
2590-1982 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
After driving a familiar route, people often have a poor memory of the drive. To investigate how quickly people forget information from an everyday drive we asked participants (n = 38) to take a 20-min simulated drive on familiar local roads and after a delay, answer questions about what happened and what they saw at four locations. We questioned drivers either immediately (<1 s), 20 s or 45 s after driving through each location, or at the end of the drive. Recall accuracy remained high when drivers were questioned immediately and at delays of 20 s and 45 s, but was significantly poorer when drivers were questioned at the end of the drive. Recall accuracy for stopping at a location did not decrease regardless of delay. The results add to our knowledge about the role of attention and memory for highly practised and largely automatic skills, such as everyday driving. |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198220300609 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT devinsrichards forgottenorneverconsciouslyprocessedacomparisonofimmediateanddelayedrecallofdrivingdetails AT samuelgcharlton forgottenorneverconsciouslyprocessedacomparisonofimmediateanddelayedrecallofdrivingdetails |
_version_ |
1724622342843269120 |