Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details

After driving a familiar route, people often have a poor memory of the drive. To investigate how quickly people forget information from an everyday drive we asked participants (n = 38) to take a 20-min simulated drive on familiar local roads and after a delay, answer questions about what happened an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Devin S. Richards, Samuel G. Charlton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-07-01
Series:Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198220300609
id doaj-23078916811d47f8acc5dd7bf9c8e273
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23078916811d47f8acc5dd7bf9c8e2732020-11-25T03:19:27ZengElsevierTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives2590-19822020-07-016100149Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving detailsDevin S. Richards0Samuel G. Charlton1Transport Research Group, University of Waikato, New ZealandCorresponding author at: School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.; Transport Research Group, University of Waikato, New ZealandAfter driving a familiar route, people often have a poor memory of the drive. To investigate how quickly people forget information from an everyday drive we asked participants (n = 38) to take a 20-min simulated drive on familiar local roads and after a delay, answer questions about what happened and what they saw at four locations. We questioned drivers either immediately (<1 s), 20 s or 45 s after driving through each location, or at the end of the drive. Recall accuracy remained high when drivers were questioned immediately and at delays of 20 s and 45 s, but was significantly poorer when drivers were questioned at the end of the drive. Recall accuracy for stopping at a location did not decrease regardless of delay. The results add to our knowledge about the role of attention and memory for highly practised and largely automatic skills, such as everyday driving.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198220300609
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Devin S. Richards
Samuel G. Charlton
spellingShingle Devin S. Richards
Samuel G. Charlton
Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
author_facet Devin S. Richards
Samuel G. Charlton
author_sort Devin S. Richards
title Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details
title_short Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details
title_full Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details
title_fullStr Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details
title_full_unstemmed Forgotten or never consciously processed? A comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details
title_sort forgotten or never consciously processed? a comparison of immediate and delayed recall of driving details
publisher Elsevier
series Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
issn 2590-1982
publishDate 2020-07-01
description After driving a familiar route, people often have a poor memory of the drive. To investigate how quickly people forget information from an everyday drive we asked participants (n = 38) to take a 20-min simulated drive on familiar local roads and after a delay, answer questions about what happened and what they saw at four locations. We questioned drivers either immediately (<1 s), 20 s or 45 s after driving through each location, or at the end of the drive. Recall accuracy remained high when drivers were questioned immediately and at delays of 20 s and 45 s, but was significantly poorer when drivers were questioned at the end of the drive. Recall accuracy for stopping at a location did not decrease regardless of delay. The results add to our knowledge about the role of attention and memory for highly practised and largely automatic skills, such as everyday driving.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198220300609
work_keys_str_mv AT devinsrichards forgottenorneverconsciouslyprocessedacomparisonofimmediateanddelayedrecallofdrivingdetails
AT samuelgcharlton forgottenorneverconsciouslyprocessedacomparisonofimmediateanddelayedrecallofdrivingdetails
_version_ 1724622342843269120