Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal horizontal diameter

AIM: To analyze the correlation and agreement of corneal horizontal diameter(WTW)measured with caliper, IOL Master and Oculyzer anterior segment analysis system.<p>METHODS: Totally 41 patients with 80 eyes who underwent ICL V4c implantation in our hospital from July 2018 to January 2019 were e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao-Ling Ma, Wen-Juan Wan, Ke Li, Qi Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2020-01-01
Series:Guoji Yanke Zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2020/1/202001040.pdf
id doaj-22fc45852a3747efaa9304025f52bbc8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22fc45852a3747efaa9304025f52bbc82020-11-25T01:15:25ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51231672-51232020-01-0120116817010.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2020.1.40Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal horizontal diameterXiao-Ling Ma0Wen-Juan Wan1Ke Li2Qi Li3Department of Ophthalmology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, ChinaDepartment of Ophthalmology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, ChinaAIM: To analyze the correlation and agreement of corneal horizontal diameter(WTW)measured with caliper, IOL Master and Oculyzer anterior segment analysis system.<p>METHODS: Totally 41 patients with 80 eyes who underwent ICL V4c implantation in our hospital from July 2018 to January 2019 were enrolled. Compare the correlation and agreement of preoperative WTW measured with caliper, IOL Master and Oculyzer anterior segment analysis system respectively.<p>RESULTS: The mean WTW value measured with caliper, IOL Master and Oculyzer anterior segment analysis system were: 11.73±0.40, 12.03±0.46, 11.54±0.39mm respectively, the value of caliper and IOL Master, caliper and Oculyzer, IOL Master and Oculyzer were highly correlated(<i>r</i>=0.809, 0.826, 0.785, all <i>P</i><0.01), and the 95% <i>LoA</i> of Bland-Altman analysis were(-0.84, 0.22),(-0.27, 0.64),(-0.07, 1.05)mm respectively.<p>CONCLUSION: Among the three measuring instruments, IOL Master has the largest measurement value and Oculyzer is the smallest. The three measurement methods have poor consistency and cannot be replaced in clinical application. Whereas, their measurements are highly correlated. In clinical application, the measurements of IOL Master and Oculyzer can be corrected based on the difference with caliper.http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2020/1/202001040.pdfcorneal horizontal diameterimplantable collamer lenscaliperiol masteroculyzer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiao-Ling Ma
Wen-Juan Wan
Ke Li
Qi Li
spellingShingle Xiao-Ling Ma
Wen-Juan Wan
Ke Li
Qi Li
Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal horizontal diameter
Guoji Yanke Zazhi
corneal horizontal diameter
implantable collamer lens
caliper
iol master
oculyzer
author_facet Xiao-Ling Ma
Wen-Juan Wan
Ke Li
Qi Li
author_sort Xiao-Ling Ma
title Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal horizontal diameter
title_short Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal horizontal diameter
title_full Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal horizontal diameter
title_fullStr Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal horizontal diameter
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal horizontal diameter
title_sort comparison of three instruments for measuring corneal horizontal diameter
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
series Guoji Yanke Zazhi
issn 1672-5123
1672-5123
publishDate 2020-01-01
description AIM: To analyze the correlation and agreement of corneal horizontal diameter(WTW)measured with caliper, IOL Master and Oculyzer anterior segment analysis system.<p>METHODS: Totally 41 patients with 80 eyes who underwent ICL V4c implantation in our hospital from July 2018 to January 2019 were enrolled. Compare the correlation and agreement of preoperative WTW measured with caliper, IOL Master and Oculyzer anterior segment analysis system respectively.<p>RESULTS: The mean WTW value measured with caliper, IOL Master and Oculyzer anterior segment analysis system were: 11.73±0.40, 12.03±0.46, 11.54±0.39mm respectively, the value of caliper and IOL Master, caliper and Oculyzer, IOL Master and Oculyzer were highly correlated(<i>r</i>=0.809, 0.826, 0.785, all <i>P</i><0.01), and the 95% <i>LoA</i> of Bland-Altman analysis were(-0.84, 0.22),(-0.27, 0.64),(-0.07, 1.05)mm respectively.<p>CONCLUSION: Among the three measuring instruments, IOL Master has the largest measurement value and Oculyzer is the smallest. The three measurement methods have poor consistency and cannot be replaced in clinical application. Whereas, their measurements are highly correlated. In clinical application, the measurements of IOL Master and Oculyzer can be corrected based on the difference with caliper.
topic corneal horizontal diameter
implantable collamer lens
caliper
iol master
oculyzer
url http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2020/1/202001040.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaolingma comparisonofthreeinstrumentsformeasuringcornealhorizontaldiameter
AT wenjuanwan comparisonofthreeinstrumentsformeasuringcornealhorizontaldiameter
AT keli comparisonofthreeinstrumentsformeasuringcornealhorizontaldiameter
AT qili comparisonofthreeinstrumentsformeasuringcornealhorizontaldiameter
_version_ 1725153372661612544