Physical Demands in Three Different Basketball Competitions Played By the Same Under-18 Players

The goal of this study was to compare the physical demands of the same team in three different basketball com- petitions (EBA league (EBA), U18 regional league (U18L), and a U18 international tournament (U18T)) during the same season. Data from eleven U18 players (age: 16.92 ± 0.67 years) were colle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugo Salazar, Franc Garcia, Luka Svilar, Julen Castellano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Montenegrin Sports Academy 2021-09-01
Series:Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://mjssm.me/?sekcija=article&artid=224
id doaj-22fad703954942f7b6f03bc7ff920e86
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22fad703954942f7b6f03bc7ff920e862021-07-13T10:44:56ZengMontenegrin Sports AcademyMontenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine1800-87551800-87632021-09-01102596410.26773/mjssm.210909Physical Demands in Three Different Basketball Competitions Played By the Same Under-18 PlayersHugo Salazar0Franc Garcia1Luka Svilar2Julen Castellano3University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Faculty of Education and Sport, Vitoria-Gasteiz, SpainUniversity of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Faculty of Education and Sport, Vitoria-Gasteiz, SpainBC Unics, Physical Performance Department, Kazan, RussiaUniversity of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Faculty of Education and Sport, Vitoria-Gasteiz, SpainThe goal of this study was to compare the physical demands of the same team in three different basketball com- petitions (EBA league (EBA), U18 regional league (U18L), and a U18 international tournament (U18T)) during the same season. Data from eleven U18 players (age: 16.92 ± 0.67 years) were collected using inertial movement units. As external load variables, Player Load (PL), accelerations (ACC), decelerations (DEC), changes of direction (COD), and jumps (JUMP) were expressed in their total (t) and high intensity (h) values. The analysis of variances (ANOVA) and effect size (ES, Cohen’s d) with their respective 90% confidence intervals were applied to identify differences between the competitions. U18T showed the highest values in PL, tACC, tDEC, hDEC, tCOD, tJUMP, and hJUMP (small to moderate ES). However, the hACC and hCOD values were greater in EBA (small ES) than in U18L and U18T. In conclusion, all three competitions presented different external load demands for the same group of players. This data could help basketball coaches to optimize the training process based on the competition in which their team plays. Furthermore, data could also indicate the most suitable competition for players’ development.https://mjssm.me/?sekcija=article&artid=224basketballinertial movement analysisteam sportmonitoringtraining load
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hugo Salazar
Franc Garcia
Luka Svilar
Julen Castellano
spellingShingle Hugo Salazar
Franc Garcia
Luka Svilar
Julen Castellano
Physical Demands in Three Different Basketball Competitions Played By the Same Under-18 Players
Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
basketball
inertial movement analysis
team sport
monitoring
training load
author_facet Hugo Salazar
Franc Garcia
Luka Svilar
Julen Castellano
author_sort Hugo Salazar
title Physical Demands in Three Different Basketball Competitions Played By the Same Under-18 Players
title_short Physical Demands in Three Different Basketball Competitions Played By the Same Under-18 Players
title_full Physical Demands in Three Different Basketball Competitions Played By the Same Under-18 Players
title_fullStr Physical Demands in Three Different Basketball Competitions Played By the Same Under-18 Players
title_full_unstemmed Physical Demands in Three Different Basketball Competitions Played By the Same Under-18 Players
title_sort physical demands in three different basketball competitions played by the same under-18 players
publisher Montenegrin Sports Academy
series Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
issn 1800-8755
1800-8763
publishDate 2021-09-01
description The goal of this study was to compare the physical demands of the same team in three different basketball com- petitions (EBA league (EBA), U18 regional league (U18L), and a U18 international tournament (U18T)) during the same season. Data from eleven U18 players (age: 16.92 ± 0.67 years) were collected using inertial movement units. As external load variables, Player Load (PL), accelerations (ACC), decelerations (DEC), changes of direction (COD), and jumps (JUMP) were expressed in their total (t) and high intensity (h) values. The analysis of variances (ANOVA) and effect size (ES, Cohen’s d) with their respective 90% confidence intervals were applied to identify differences between the competitions. U18T showed the highest values in PL, tACC, tDEC, hDEC, tCOD, tJUMP, and hJUMP (small to moderate ES). However, the hACC and hCOD values were greater in EBA (small ES) than in U18L and U18T. In conclusion, all three competitions presented different external load demands for the same group of players. This data could help basketball coaches to optimize the training process based on the competition in which their team plays. Furthermore, data could also indicate the most suitable competition for players’ development.
topic basketball
inertial movement analysis
team sport
monitoring
training load
url https://mjssm.me/?sekcija=article&artid=224
work_keys_str_mv AT hugosalazar physicaldemandsinthreedifferentbasketballcompetitionsplayedbythesameunder18players
AT francgarcia physicaldemandsinthreedifferentbasketballcompetitionsplayedbythesameunder18players
AT lukasvilar physicaldemandsinthreedifferentbasketballcompetitionsplayedbythesameunder18players
AT julencastellano physicaldemandsinthreedifferentbasketballcompetitionsplayedbythesameunder18players
_version_ 1721305463071440896