Efficacy and adverse effects of cidofovir for treatment of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients

Kidney transplant provides patients with end-stage kidney disease a clear survival benefit compared to patients who remain on dialysis. Immunosuppressive therapy is crucial for maintaining graft survival. However, high level of suppression can increase the susceptibility for BK virus reactivation fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Supavit Chesdachai, Charat Thongprayoon, Jackrapong Bruminhent, Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society of Diabetic Nephropathy Prevention 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Nephropharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jnephropharmacology.com/PDF/npj-7-10.pdf
id doaj-22f8d8e1bc504505b21c5f3b3078ef19
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22f8d8e1bc504505b21c5f3b3078ef192020-11-25T01:28:51ZengSociety of Diabetic Nephropathy Prevention Journal of Nephropharmacology2345-42022018-01-0171101710.15171/npj.2018.04npj-20180227115634Efficacy and adverse effects of cidofovir for treatment of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipientsSupavit Chesdachai0Charat Thongprayoon1Jackrapong Bruminhent2Wisit Cheungpasitporn3Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, USADepartment of Internal Medicine, Bassett Medical Center, Cooperstown, NY, USADepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, ThailandDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USAKidney transplant provides patients with end-stage kidney disease a clear survival benefit compared to patients who remain on dialysis. Immunosuppressive therapy is crucial for maintaining graft survival. However, high level of suppression can increase the susceptibility for BK virus reactivation following transplantation, leading to BK virus-associated nephropathy (BK-VAN) and allograft loss. Its clinical presentations are often asymptomatic or solely rising of serum creatinine. While reduction of immunosuppression remains the mainstay treatment of BK viremia/nephropathy, there have been many proposed adjuvant therapy such as antiviral agents, fluoroquinolone, immunoglobulin, and immunotherapy. Cidofovir is one of the adjuvant therapies that have been studied in many case series and cohort studies with unclear data on benefit-risk assessment. This review aims to present the current literature on the efficacy, potential adverse effects and cost-effectiveness of cidofovir treatment for BK viremia/nephropathy.http://jnephropharmacology.com/PDF/npj-7-10.pdfBK virusCidofovirKidney transplantationPolyoma virusTransplantation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Supavit Chesdachai
Charat Thongprayoon
Jackrapong Bruminhent
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
spellingShingle Supavit Chesdachai
Charat Thongprayoon
Jackrapong Bruminhent
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
Efficacy and adverse effects of cidofovir for treatment of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients
Journal of Nephropharmacology
BK virus
Cidofovir
Kidney transplantation
Polyoma virus
Transplantation
author_facet Supavit Chesdachai
Charat Thongprayoon
Jackrapong Bruminhent
Wisit Cheungpasitporn
author_sort Supavit Chesdachai
title Efficacy and adverse effects of cidofovir for treatment of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients
title_short Efficacy and adverse effects of cidofovir for treatment of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients
title_full Efficacy and adverse effects of cidofovir for treatment of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients
title_fullStr Efficacy and adverse effects of cidofovir for treatment of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and adverse effects of cidofovir for treatment of BK virus infection in kidney transplant recipients
title_sort efficacy and adverse effects of cidofovir for treatment of bk virus infection in kidney transplant recipients
publisher Society of Diabetic Nephropathy Prevention
series Journal of Nephropharmacology
issn 2345-4202
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Kidney transplant provides patients with end-stage kidney disease a clear survival benefit compared to patients who remain on dialysis. Immunosuppressive therapy is crucial for maintaining graft survival. However, high level of suppression can increase the susceptibility for BK virus reactivation following transplantation, leading to BK virus-associated nephropathy (BK-VAN) and allograft loss. Its clinical presentations are often asymptomatic or solely rising of serum creatinine. While reduction of immunosuppression remains the mainstay treatment of BK viremia/nephropathy, there have been many proposed adjuvant therapy such as antiviral agents, fluoroquinolone, immunoglobulin, and immunotherapy. Cidofovir is one of the adjuvant therapies that have been studied in many case series and cohort studies with unclear data on benefit-risk assessment. This review aims to present the current literature on the efficacy, potential adverse effects and cost-effectiveness of cidofovir treatment for BK viremia/nephropathy.
topic BK virus
Cidofovir
Kidney transplantation
Polyoma virus
Transplantation
url http://jnephropharmacology.com/PDF/npj-7-10.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT supavitchesdachai efficacyandadverseeffectsofcidofovirfortreatmentofbkvirusinfectioninkidneytransplantrecipients
AT charatthongprayoon efficacyandadverseeffectsofcidofovirfortreatmentofbkvirusinfectioninkidneytransplantrecipients
AT jackrapongbruminhent efficacyandadverseeffectsofcidofovirfortreatmentofbkvirusinfectioninkidneytransplantrecipients
AT wisitcheungpasitporn efficacyandadverseeffectsofcidofovirfortreatmentofbkvirusinfectioninkidneytransplantrecipients
_version_ 1725099926391619584