A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis

Abstract Background In characterizing malaria epidemiology, measuring mosquito infectiousness informs the entomological inoculation rate, an important metric of malaria transmission. PCR-based methods have been touted as more sensitive than the current “gold-standard” circumsporozoite (CSP) ELISA. W...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Allison L. Hendershot, Endashaw Esayas, Alice C. Sutcliffe, Seth R. Irish, Endalamaw Gadisa, Fitsum G. Tadesse, Neil F. Lobo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-09-01
Series:Parasites & Vectors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04976-z
id doaj-22f7c519d0d84d2688ba0d5d738f669a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22f7c519d0d84d2688ba0d5d738f669a2021-09-19T11:36:07ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052021-09-0114111010.1186/s13071-021-04976-zA comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensisAllison L. Hendershot0Endashaw Esayas1Alice C. Sutcliffe2Seth R. Irish3Endalamaw Gadisa4Fitsum G. Tadesse5Neil F. Lobo6Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre DameMalaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Research Directorate, Armauer Hansen Research InstituteEntomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionEntomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionMalaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Research Directorate, Armauer Hansen Research InstituteMalaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Research Directorate, Armauer Hansen Research InstituteEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre DameAbstract Background In characterizing malaria epidemiology, measuring mosquito infectiousness informs the entomological inoculation rate, an important metric of malaria transmission. PCR-based methods have been touted as more sensitive than the current “gold-standard” circumsporozoite (CSP) ELISA. Wider application of PCR-based methods has been limited by lack of specificity for the infectious sporozoite stage. We compared a PCR method for detecting the parasite’s mitochondrial (mt) cytochrome oxidase I (COX-I) gene with ELISA for detecting circumsporozoite protein for identification of different life stages of the parasite during development within a mosquito. Methods A PCR-based method targeting the Plasmodium mt COX-I gene was compared with the CSP ELISA method to assess infectivity in Anopheles arabiensis colony mosquitoes fed on blood from patients infected with Plasmodium vivax. Mosquitoes were tested at six post-infection time points (days 0.5, 1, 6, 9, 12, 15). The head and thorax and the abdomen for each specimen were tested separately with each method. Agreement between methods at each infection stage was measured using Cohen’s kappa measure of test association. Results Infection status of mosquitoes was assessed in approximately 90 head/thorax and 90 abdomen segments at each time point; in total, 538 head/thorax and 534 abdomen segments were tested. In mosquitoes bisected after 0.5, 1, and 6 days post-infection (dpi), the mt COX-I PCR detected Plasmodium DNA in both the abdomen (88, 78, and 67%, respectively) and head/thorax segments (69, 60, and 44%, respectively), whilst CSP ELISA detected sporozoites in only one abdomen on day 6 post-infection. PCR was also more sensitive than ELISA for detection of Plasmodium in mosquitoes bisected after 9, 12, and 15 dpi in both the head and thorax and abdomen. There was fair agreement between methods for time points 9–15 dpi (κ = 0.312, 95% CI: 0.230–0.394). Conclusions The mt COX-I PCR is a highly sensitive, robust method for detecting Plasmodium DNA in mosquitoes, but its limited Plasmodium life-stage specificity cannot be overcome by bisection of the head and thorax from the abdomen prior to PCR. Thus, the mt COX-I PCR is a poor candidate for identifying infectious mosquitoes. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04976-zCSP ELISACOX-I PCRPlasmodiumInfectious mosquitoesWild mosquitoesInfectious reservoir
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Allison L. Hendershot
Endashaw Esayas
Alice C. Sutcliffe
Seth R. Irish
Endalamaw Gadisa
Fitsum G. Tadesse
Neil F. Lobo
spellingShingle Allison L. Hendershot
Endashaw Esayas
Alice C. Sutcliffe
Seth R. Irish
Endalamaw Gadisa
Fitsum G. Tadesse
Neil F. Lobo
A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
Parasites & Vectors
CSP ELISA
COX-I PCR
Plasmodium
Infectious mosquitoes
Wild mosquitoes
Infectious reservoir
author_facet Allison L. Hendershot
Endashaw Esayas
Alice C. Sutcliffe
Seth R. Irish
Endalamaw Gadisa
Fitsum G. Tadesse
Neil F. Lobo
author_sort Allison L. Hendershot
title A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title_short A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title_full A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title_fullStr A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
title_sort comparison of pcr and elisa methods to detect different stages of plasmodium vivax in anopheles arabiensis
publisher BMC
series Parasites & Vectors
issn 1756-3305
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Abstract Background In characterizing malaria epidemiology, measuring mosquito infectiousness informs the entomological inoculation rate, an important metric of malaria transmission. PCR-based methods have been touted as more sensitive than the current “gold-standard” circumsporozoite (CSP) ELISA. Wider application of PCR-based methods has been limited by lack of specificity for the infectious sporozoite stage. We compared a PCR method for detecting the parasite’s mitochondrial (mt) cytochrome oxidase I (COX-I) gene with ELISA for detecting circumsporozoite protein for identification of different life stages of the parasite during development within a mosquito. Methods A PCR-based method targeting the Plasmodium mt COX-I gene was compared with the CSP ELISA method to assess infectivity in Anopheles arabiensis colony mosquitoes fed on blood from patients infected with Plasmodium vivax. Mosquitoes were tested at six post-infection time points (days 0.5, 1, 6, 9, 12, 15). The head and thorax and the abdomen for each specimen were tested separately with each method. Agreement between methods at each infection stage was measured using Cohen’s kappa measure of test association. Results Infection status of mosquitoes was assessed in approximately 90 head/thorax and 90 abdomen segments at each time point; in total, 538 head/thorax and 534 abdomen segments were tested. In mosquitoes bisected after 0.5, 1, and 6 days post-infection (dpi), the mt COX-I PCR detected Plasmodium DNA in both the abdomen (88, 78, and 67%, respectively) and head/thorax segments (69, 60, and 44%, respectively), whilst CSP ELISA detected sporozoites in only one abdomen on day 6 post-infection. PCR was also more sensitive than ELISA for detection of Plasmodium in mosquitoes bisected after 9, 12, and 15 dpi in both the head and thorax and abdomen. There was fair agreement between methods for time points 9–15 dpi (κ = 0.312, 95% CI: 0.230–0.394). Conclusions The mt COX-I PCR is a highly sensitive, robust method for detecting Plasmodium DNA in mosquitoes, but its limited Plasmodium life-stage specificity cannot be overcome by bisection of the head and thorax from the abdomen prior to PCR. Thus, the mt COX-I PCR is a poor candidate for identifying infectious mosquitoes. Graphical Abstract
topic CSP ELISA
COX-I PCR
Plasmodium
Infectious mosquitoes
Wild mosquitoes
Infectious reservoir
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04976-z
work_keys_str_mv AT allisonlhendershot acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT endashawesayas acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT alicecsutcliffe acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT sethrirish acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT endalamawgadisa acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT fitsumgtadesse acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT neilflobo acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT allisonlhendershot comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT endashawesayas comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT alicecsutcliffe comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT sethrirish comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT endalamawgadisa comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT fitsumgtadesse comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
AT neilflobo comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis
_version_ 1717375578051444736