A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis
Abstract Background In characterizing malaria epidemiology, measuring mosquito infectiousness informs the entomological inoculation rate, an important metric of malaria transmission. PCR-based methods have been touted as more sensitive than the current “gold-standard” circumsporozoite (CSP) ELISA. W...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Parasites & Vectors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04976-z |
id |
doaj-22f7c519d0d84d2688ba0d5d738f669a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-22f7c519d0d84d2688ba0d5d738f669a2021-09-19T11:36:07ZengBMCParasites & Vectors1756-33052021-09-0114111010.1186/s13071-021-04976-zA comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensisAllison L. Hendershot0Endashaw Esayas1Alice C. Sutcliffe2Seth R. Irish3Endalamaw Gadisa4Fitsum G. Tadesse5Neil F. Lobo6Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre DameMalaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Research Directorate, Armauer Hansen Research InstituteEntomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionEntomology Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionMalaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Research Directorate, Armauer Hansen Research InstituteMalaria and Neglected Tropical Diseases Research Directorate, Armauer Hansen Research InstituteEck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre DameAbstract Background In characterizing malaria epidemiology, measuring mosquito infectiousness informs the entomological inoculation rate, an important metric of malaria transmission. PCR-based methods have been touted as more sensitive than the current “gold-standard” circumsporozoite (CSP) ELISA. Wider application of PCR-based methods has been limited by lack of specificity for the infectious sporozoite stage. We compared a PCR method for detecting the parasite’s mitochondrial (mt) cytochrome oxidase I (COX-I) gene with ELISA for detecting circumsporozoite protein for identification of different life stages of the parasite during development within a mosquito. Methods A PCR-based method targeting the Plasmodium mt COX-I gene was compared with the CSP ELISA method to assess infectivity in Anopheles arabiensis colony mosquitoes fed on blood from patients infected with Plasmodium vivax. Mosquitoes were tested at six post-infection time points (days 0.5, 1, 6, 9, 12, 15). The head and thorax and the abdomen for each specimen were tested separately with each method. Agreement between methods at each infection stage was measured using Cohen’s kappa measure of test association. Results Infection status of mosquitoes was assessed in approximately 90 head/thorax and 90 abdomen segments at each time point; in total, 538 head/thorax and 534 abdomen segments were tested. In mosquitoes bisected after 0.5, 1, and 6 days post-infection (dpi), the mt COX-I PCR detected Plasmodium DNA in both the abdomen (88, 78, and 67%, respectively) and head/thorax segments (69, 60, and 44%, respectively), whilst CSP ELISA detected sporozoites in only one abdomen on day 6 post-infection. PCR was also more sensitive than ELISA for detection of Plasmodium in mosquitoes bisected after 9, 12, and 15 dpi in both the head and thorax and abdomen. There was fair agreement between methods for time points 9–15 dpi (κ = 0.312, 95% CI: 0.230–0.394). Conclusions The mt COX-I PCR is a highly sensitive, robust method for detecting Plasmodium DNA in mosquitoes, but its limited Plasmodium life-stage specificity cannot be overcome by bisection of the head and thorax from the abdomen prior to PCR. Thus, the mt COX-I PCR is a poor candidate for identifying infectious mosquitoes. Graphical Abstracthttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04976-zCSP ELISACOX-I PCRPlasmodiumInfectious mosquitoesWild mosquitoesInfectious reservoir |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Allison L. Hendershot Endashaw Esayas Alice C. Sutcliffe Seth R. Irish Endalamaw Gadisa Fitsum G. Tadesse Neil F. Lobo |
spellingShingle |
Allison L. Hendershot Endashaw Esayas Alice C. Sutcliffe Seth R. Irish Endalamaw Gadisa Fitsum G. Tadesse Neil F. Lobo A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis Parasites & Vectors CSP ELISA COX-I PCR Plasmodium Infectious mosquitoes Wild mosquitoes Infectious reservoir |
author_facet |
Allison L. Hendershot Endashaw Esayas Alice C. Sutcliffe Seth R. Irish Endalamaw Gadisa Fitsum G. Tadesse Neil F. Lobo |
author_sort |
Allison L. Hendershot |
title |
A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis |
title_short |
A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis |
title_full |
A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of PCR and ELISA methods to detect different stages of Plasmodium vivax in Anopheles arabiensis |
title_sort |
comparison of pcr and elisa methods to detect different stages of plasmodium vivax in anopheles arabiensis |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Parasites & Vectors |
issn |
1756-3305 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Background In characterizing malaria epidemiology, measuring mosquito infectiousness informs the entomological inoculation rate, an important metric of malaria transmission. PCR-based methods have been touted as more sensitive than the current “gold-standard” circumsporozoite (CSP) ELISA. Wider application of PCR-based methods has been limited by lack of specificity for the infectious sporozoite stage. We compared a PCR method for detecting the parasite’s mitochondrial (mt) cytochrome oxidase I (COX-I) gene with ELISA for detecting circumsporozoite protein for identification of different life stages of the parasite during development within a mosquito. Methods A PCR-based method targeting the Plasmodium mt COX-I gene was compared with the CSP ELISA method to assess infectivity in Anopheles arabiensis colony mosquitoes fed on blood from patients infected with Plasmodium vivax. Mosquitoes were tested at six post-infection time points (days 0.5, 1, 6, 9, 12, 15). The head and thorax and the abdomen for each specimen were tested separately with each method. Agreement between methods at each infection stage was measured using Cohen’s kappa measure of test association. Results Infection status of mosquitoes was assessed in approximately 90 head/thorax and 90 abdomen segments at each time point; in total, 538 head/thorax and 534 abdomen segments were tested. In mosquitoes bisected after 0.5, 1, and 6 days post-infection (dpi), the mt COX-I PCR detected Plasmodium DNA in both the abdomen (88, 78, and 67%, respectively) and head/thorax segments (69, 60, and 44%, respectively), whilst CSP ELISA detected sporozoites in only one abdomen on day 6 post-infection. PCR was also more sensitive than ELISA for detection of Plasmodium in mosquitoes bisected after 9, 12, and 15 dpi in both the head and thorax and abdomen. There was fair agreement between methods for time points 9–15 dpi (κ = 0.312, 95% CI: 0.230–0.394). Conclusions The mt COX-I PCR is a highly sensitive, robust method for detecting Plasmodium DNA in mosquitoes, but its limited Plasmodium life-stage specificity cannot be overcome by bisection of the head and thorax from the abdomen prior to PCR. Thus, the mt COX-I PCR is a poor candidate for identifying infectious mosquitoes. Graphical Abstract |
topic |
CSP ELISA COX-I PCR Plasmodium Infectious mosquitoes Wild mosquitoes Infectious reservoir |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-021-04976-z |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT allisonlhendershot acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT endashawesayas acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT alicecsutcliffe acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT sethrirish acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT endalamawgadisa acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT fitsumgtadesse acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT neilflobo acomparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT allisonlhendershot comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT endashawesayas comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT alicecsutcliffe comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT sethrirish comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT endalamawgadisa comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT fitsumgtadesse comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis AT neilflobo comparisonofpcrandelisamethodstodetectdifferentstagesofplasmodiumvivaxinanophelesarabiensis |
_version_ |
1717375578051444736 |