Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine
The aim was to evaluate the reliability of a newly-developed ball machine named 'Hightof', on the field and to assess its accuracy. The experiment was conducted in the collaboration of the 'Hawk-Eye' technology. The accuracy and reliability of this ball machine were assessed duri...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Uludag
2016-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Sports Science and Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-15-263.xml.xml |
id |
doaj-22ec2eb0a6524a67821ffa5dee24f080 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-22ec2eb0a6524a67821ffa5dee24f0802020-11-25T01:23:43ZengUniversity of UludagJournal of Sports Science and Medicine1303-29682016-06-01152263267Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball MachineCyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt0French Tennis Federation, Stade Roland-Garros, 2 avenue Gordon Bennett, Paris, FranceThe aim was to evaluate the reliability of a newly-developed ball machine named 'Hightof', on the field and to assess its accuracy. The experiment was conducted in the collaboration of the 'Hawk-Eye' technology. The accuracy and reliability of this ball machine were assessed during an incremental test, with 1 min of exercise and 30 sec of recovery, where the frequency of the balls increased from 10 to 30 balls·min-1. The initial frequency was 10 and increased by 2 until 22, then by 1 until 30 balls·min-1. The reference points for the impact were 8.39m from the net and 2.70m from lateral line for the right side and 2.83m for the left side. The precision of the machine was similar on the right and left sides (0.63 ± 0.39 vs 0.63 ± 0.34 m). The distances to the reference point were 0.52 ± 0.42, 0.26 ± 0.19, 0.52 ± 0.37, 0.28 ± 0.19 m for the Y-right, X-right, Y-left and X-left impacts. The precision was constant and did not increase with the intensity. (e.g ball frequency). The ball velocity was 86.3 ± 1.5 and 86.5 ± 1.3 km·h-1 for the right and the left side, respectively. The coefficient of variation for the velocity ranged between 1 and 2% in all stages (ball velocity ranging from 10 to 30 balls·min-1). Conclusion: both the accuracy and the reliability of this new ball machine appear satisfying enough for field testing and training.http://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-15-263.xml.xmlTechnologytennistestingtrainingball-machine |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt |
spellingShingle |
Cyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Technology tennis testing training ball-machine |
author_facet |
Cyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt |
author_sort |
Cyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt |
title |
Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine |
title_short |
Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine |
title_full |
Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine |
title_fullStr |
Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine |
title_sort |
accuracy and reliability of a new tennis ball machine |
publisher |
University of Uludag |
series |
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine |
issn |
1303-2968 |
publishDate |
2016-06-01 |
description |
The aim was to evaluate the reliability of a newly-developed ball machine named 'Hightof', on the field and to assess its accuracy. The experiment was conducted in the collaboration of the 'Hawk-Eye' technology. The accuracy and reliability of this ball machine were assessed during an incremental test, with 1 min of exercise and 30 sec of recovery, where the frequency of the balls increased from 10 to 30 balls·min-1. The initial frequency was 10 and increased by 2 until 22, then by 1 until 30 balls·min-1. The reference points for the impact were 8.39m from the net and 2.70m from lateral line for the right side and 2.83m for the left side. The precision of the machine was similar on the right and left sides (0.63 ± 0.39 vs 0.63 ± 0.34 m). The distances to the reference point were 0.52 ± 0.42, 0.26 ± 0.19, 0.52 ± 0.37, 0.28 ± 0.19 m for the Y-right, X-right, Y-left and X-left impacts. The precision was constant and did not increase with the intensity. (e.g ball frequency). The ball velocity was 86.3 ± 1.5 and 86.5 ± 1.3 km·h-1 for the right and the left side, respectively. The coefficient of variation for the velocity ranged between 1 and 2% in all stages (ball velocity ranging from 10 to 30 balls·min-1). Conclusion: both the accuracy and the reliability of this new ball machine appear satisfying enough for field testing and training. |
topic |
Technology tennis testing training ball-machine |
url |
http://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-15-263.xml.xml |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cyrilbrechbuhlgregoiremilletlaurentschmitt accuracyandreliabilityofanewtennisballmachine |
_version_ |
1725120339386564608 |