Synchronous facial action binds dynamic facial features

Abstract We asked how dynamic facial features are perceptually grouped. To address this question, we varied the timing of mouth movements relative to eyebrow movements, while measuring the detectability of a small temporal misalignment between a pair of oscillating eyebrows—an eyebrow wave. We found...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alan Johnston, Ben B. Brown, Ryan Elson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-03-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86725-x
id doaj-22c7c8c93e3a48a2b2a4c2aebabd0af1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22c7c8c93e3a48a2b2a4c2aebabd0af12021-04-04T11:30:20ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-03-0111111010.1038/s41598-021-86725-xSynchronous facial action binds dynamic facial featuresAlan Johnston0Ben B. Brown1Ryan Elson2School of Psychology, University Park, The University of NottinghamSchool of Psychology, University Park, The University of NottinghamSchool of Psychology, University Park, The University of NottinghamAbstract We asked how dynamic facial features are perceptually grouped. To address this question, we varied the timing of mouth movements relative to eyebrow movements, while measuring the detectability of a small temporal misalignment between a pair of oscillating eyebrows—an eyebrow wave. We found eyebrow wave detection performance was worse for synchronous movements of the eyebrows and mouth. Subsequently, we found this effect was specific to stimuli presented to the right visual field, implicating the involvement of left lateralised visual speech areas. Adaptation has been used as a tool in low-level vision to establish the presence of separable visual channels. Adaptation to moving eyebrows and mouths with various relative timings reduced eyebrow wave detection but only when the adapting mouth and eyebrows moved asynchronously. Inverting the face led to a greater reduction in detection after adaptation particularly for asynchronous facial motion at test. We conclude that synchronous motion binds dynamic facial features whereas asynchronous motion releases them, allowing adaptation to impair eyebrow wave detection.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86725-x
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alan Johnston
Ben B. Brown
Ryan Elson
spellingShingle Alan Johnston
Ben B. Brown
Ryan Elson
Synchronous facial action binds dynamic facial features
Scientific Reports
author_facet Alan Johnston
Ben B. Brown
Ryan Elson
author_sort Alan Johnston
title Synchronous facial action binds dynamic facial features
title_short Synchronous facial action binds dynamic facial features
title_full Synchronous facial action binds dynamic facial features
title_fullStr Synchronous facial action binds dynamic facial features
title_full_unstemmed Synchronous facial action binds dynamic facial features
title_sort synchronous facial action binds dynamic facial features
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract We asked how dynamic facial features are perceptually grouped. To address this question, we varied the timing of mouth movements relative to eyebrow movements, while measuring the detectability of a small temporal misalignment between a pair of oscillating eyebrows—an eyebrow wave. We found eyebrow wave detection performance was worse for synchronous movements of the eyebrows and mouth. Subsequently, we found this effect was specific to stimuli presented to the right visual field, implicating the involvement of left lateralised visual speech areas. Adaptation has been used as a tool in low-level vision to establish the presence of separable visual channels. Adaptation to moving eyebrows and mouths with various relative timings reduced eyebrow wave detection but only when the adapting mouth and eyebrows moved asynchronously. Inverting the face led to a greater reduction in detection after adaptation particularly for asynchronous facial motion at test. We conclude that synchronous motion binds dynamic facial features whereas asynchronous motion releases them, allowing adaptation to impair eyebrow wave detection.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86725-x
work_keys_str_mv AT alanjohnston synchronousfacialactionbindsdynamicfacialfeatures
AT benbbrown synchronousfacialactionbindsdynamicfacialfeatures
AT ryanelson synchronousfacialactionbindsdynamicfacialfeatures
_version_ 1721542628074323968