Dependence and Fundamentality
I argue that dependence is neither necessary nor sufficient for relative fundamentality. I then introduce the notion of 'likeness in nature' and provide an account of relative fundamentality in terms of it and the notion of dependence. Finally, I discuss some puzzles that arise in Aristotl...
Main Author: | Justin Zylstra |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
University of Tartu
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Studia Philosophica Estonica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.spe.ut.ee/ojs/index.php/spe/article/view/spe.2014.7.2.02 |
Similar Items
-
Between Ramus, Alexander of Aphrodisias and Averroes. Francesco Vimercato’s Commentary to Book Twelve of Aristotle’s Metaphysics
by: Danilo Facca
Published: (2012-02-01) -
Francisco Suárez: Metafísica, Política e Ética
Published: (2020) -
Giordano Bruno e il Problema della Modernità
by: Stefano Ulliana
Published: (2005-01-01) -
Giordano Bruno e il Problema della Modernita
by: Stefano Ulliana
Published: (2005-08-01) -
A Contemplation on the Role of Gender in One's Identity: A Critical Review of Witt's "Uni-Essentialism" Thesis
by: Zahra Zargar, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)