Dependence and Fundamentality

I argue that dependence is neither necessary nor sufficient for relative fundamentality. I then introduce the notion of 'likeness in nature' and provide an account of relative fundamentality in terms of it and the notion of dependence. Finally, I discuss some puzzles that arise in Aristotl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Justin Zylstra
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: University of Tartu 2014-12-01
Series:Studia Philosophica Estonica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.spe.ut.ee/ojs/index.php/spe/article/view/spe.2014.7.2.02
id doaj-22c52762d5d64d20ac5d8f3dacb98ac6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22c52762d5d64d20ac5d8f3dacb98ac62020-11-24T21:01:27ZdeuUniversity of TartuStudia Philosophica Estonica1736-58992014-12-017.252810.12697/spe.2014.7.2.02Dependence and FundamentalityJustin Zylstra0Department of Philosophy, University of AlbertaI argue that dependence is neither necessary nor sufficient for relative fundamentality. I then introduce the notion of 'likeness in nature' and provide an account of relative fundamentality in terms of it and the notion of dependence. Finally, I discuss some puzzles that arise in Aristotle's Categories, to which the theory developed is applied.http://www.spe.ut.ee/ojs/index.php/spe/article/view/spe.2014.7.2.02dependencefundamentalityAristotelian metaphysics
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Justin Zylstra
spellingShingle Justin Zylstra
Dependence and Fundamentality
Studia Philosophica Estonica
dependence
fundamentality
Aristotelian metaphysics
author_facet Justin Zylstra
author_sort Justin Zylstra
title Dependence and Fundamentality
title_short Dependence and Fundamentality
title_full Dependence and Fundamentality
title_fullStr Dependence and Fundamentality
title_full_unstemmed Dependence and Fundamentality
title_sort dependence and fundamentality
publisher University of Tartu
series Studia Philosophica Estonica
issn 1736-5899
publishDate 2014-12-01
description I argue that dependence is neither necessary nor sufficient for relative fundamentality. I then introduce the notion of 'likeness in nature' and provide an account of relative fundamentality in terms of it and the notion of dependence. Finally, I discuss some puzzles that arise in Aristotle's Categories, to which the theory developed is applied.
topic dependence
fundamentality
Aristotelian metaphysics
url http://www.spe.ut.ee/ojs/index.php/spe/article/view/spe.2014.7.2.02
work_keys_str_mv AT justinzylstra dependenceandfundamentality
_version_ 1716778002715508736