Dependence and Fundamentality
I argue that dependence is neither necessary nor sufficient for relative fundamentality. I then introduce the notion of 'likeness in nature' and provide an account of relative fundamentality in terms of it and the notion of dependence. Finally, I discuss some puzzles that arise in Aristotl...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
University of Tartu
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Studia Philosophica Estonica |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.spe.ut.ee/ojs/index.php/spe/article/view/spe.2014.7.2.02 |
id |
doaj-22c52762d5d64d20ac5d8f3dacb98ac6 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-22c52762d5d64d20ac5d8f3dacb98ac62020-11-24T21:01:27ZdeuUniversity of TartuStudia Philosophica Estonica1736-58992014-12-017.252810.12697/spe.2014.7.2.02Dependence and FundamentalityJustin Zylstra0Department of Philosophy, University of AlbertaI argue that dependence is neither necessary nor sufficient for relative fundamentality. I then introduce the notion of 'likeness in nature' and provide an account of relative fundamentality in terms of it and the notion of dependence. Finally, I discuss some puzzles that arise in Aristotle's Categories, to which the theory developed is applied.http://www.spe.ut.ee/ojs/index.php/spe/article/view/spe.2014.7.2.02dependencefundamentalityAristotelian metaphysics |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Justin Zylstra |
spellingShingle |
Justin Zylstra Dependence and Fundamentality Studia Philosophica Estonica dependence fundamentality Aristotelian metaphysics |
author_facet |
Justin Zylstra |
author_sort |
Justin Zylstra |
title |
Dependence and Fundamentality |
title_short |
Dependence and Fundamentality |
title_full |
Dependence and Fundamentality |
title_fullStr |
Dependence and Fundamentality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dependence and Fundamentality |
title_sort |
dependence and fundamentality |
publisher |
University of Tartu |
series |
Studia Philosophica Estonica |
issn |
1736-5899 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
I argue that dependence is neither necessary nor sufficient for relative fundamentality. I then introduce the notion of 'likeness in nature' and provide an account of relative fundamentality in terms of it and the notion of dependence. Finally, I discuss some puzzles that arise in Aristotle's Categories, to which the theory developed is applied. |
topic |
dependence fundamentality Aristotelian metaphysics |
url |
http://www.spe.ut.ee/ojs/index.php/spe/article/view/spe.2014.7.2.02 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT justinzylstra dependenceandfundamentality |
_version_ |
1716778002715508736 |