Neurological outcomes after surgery for spinal metastases in symptomatic patients: Does the type of decompression play a role? A comparison between different strategies in a 10-year experience

• Main Authors: F. Cofano, G. Di Perna, A. Alberti, B.M. Baldassarre, M. Ajello, N. Marengo, F. Tartara, F. Zenga, D. Garbossa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier 2021-02-01
• Series: Journal of Bone Oncology
• Subjects: Spinal metastases; Separation surgery; Minimal invasive spine surgery; Circumferential decompression; Metastatic epidural compression
• Online Access: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137420300956

Introduction: The impact of neurological deficits plays a role of inestimable importance in patients with a neoplastic disease. The role of surgery for the management of symptomatic spinal cord compression (SSCC) cannot be overemphasized, as surgery represents often the first and paramount step in patients presenting with motor deficits. The traditional paradigm of simple bilateral laminectomy for the treatment of spinal cord compression has been reviewed. The need to achieve a proper circumferential decompression of the spinal sac has been progressively highlighted in combination with the development of the more comprehensive and multidisciplinary concept of separation surgery. Objective: The aim of this paper is to analyze different strategies of decompression, while evaluating whether circumferential/anterior decompression is able to guarantee a better control and restoration of neurological functions in patients with motor impairment, if compared to traditional posterior decompression. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective observational study investigating symptomatic patients that underwent surgical treatment for spinal metastases at author’s Institutions from January 2010 to June 2019. Data recorded concerned patient demographics, tumor histology, peri-operative and follow-up neurological status (ASIA), ambulation ability, stability (SINS), grade (ESCC) and source of epidural compression and type of decompression (anterior/anterior-lateral (AD); posterior/posterior-lateral (PD/PDL); circumferential (CD)). Results: A total number of 84 patients was included. AD/CD patients showed higher chance of neurological improvement and reduced rates of worsening compared to PD/PLD group (94.1%/100% vs 60.4%; 11.8% vs 45.8% respectively). Univariate logistic regression identified immediate post-operative improvement to be a significative protective factor for worsening at last follow-up. Stratifying patients for site of compression and considering anterior and circumferential groups, immediate post-operative neurological improvement, was mostly associated with AD and CD (p 0.011 and 0.025 respectively). Walking at last follow up was influenced by post-operative maintenance of ambulation (p 0.001). Conclusion: The necessity to remove the epidural metastatic compression from its source should be considered of paramount importance. Since the majority of spinal cord compression involves firstly the ventral part of the sac, CD/AD are associated with better neurological outcomes and should be achieved in case of circumferential or anterior/anterolateral compression.