Signal Processing Implementation and Comparison of Automotive Spatial Sound Rendering Strategies

<p/> <p>Design and implementation strategies of spatial sound rendering are investigated in this paper for automotive scenarios. Six design methods are implemented for various rendering modes with different number of passengers. Specifically, the downmixing algorithms aimed at balancing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bai MingsianR, Hong Jhih-Ren
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2009-01-01
Series:EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing
Online Access:http://asmp.eurasipjournals.com/content/2009/876297
id doaj-22b64449f6a94356a7e0ab51c52f37cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22b64449f6a94356a7e0ab51c52f37cb2020-11-25T02:37:29ZengSpringerOpenEURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing1687-47141687-47222009-01-0120091876297Signal Processing Implementation and Comparison of Automotive Spatial Sound Rendering StrategiesBai MingsianRHong Jhih-Ren<p/> <p>Design and implementation strategies of spatial sound rendering are investigated in this paper for automotive scenarios. Six design methods are implemented for various rendering modes with different number of passengers. Specifically, the downmixing algorithms aimed at balancing the front and back reproductions are developed for the 5.1-channel input. Other five algorithms based on inverse filtering are implemented in two approaches. The first approach utilizes binaural (Head-Related Transfer Functions HRTFs) measured in the car interior, whereas the second approach named the point-receiver model targets a point receiver positioned at the center of the passenger's head. The proposed processing algorithms were compared via objective and subjective experiments under various listening conditions. Test data were processed by the multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) method and the least significant difference (Fisher's LSD) method as a <it>post hoc</it> test to justify the statistical significance of the experimental data. The results indicate that inverse filtering algorithms are preferred for the single passenger mode. For the multipassenger mode, however, downmixing algorithms generally outperformed the other processing techniques.</p>http://asmp.eurasipjournals.com/content/2009/876297
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bai MingsianR
Hong Jhih-Ren
spellingShingle Bai MingsianR
Hong Jhih-Ren
Signal Processing Implementation and Comparison of Automotive Spatial Sound Rendering Strategies
EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing
author_facet Bai MingsianR
Hong Jhih-Ren
author_sort Bai MingsianR
title Signal Processing Implementation and Comparison of Automotive Spatial Sound Rendering Strategies
title_short Signal Processing Implementation and Comparison of Automotive Spatial Sound Rendering Strategies
title_full Signal Processing Implementation and Comparison of Automotive Spatial Sound Rendering Strategies
title_fullStr Signal Processing Implementation and Comparison of Automotive Spatial Sound Rendering Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Signal Processing Implementation and Comparison of Automotive Spatial Sound Rendering Strategies
title_sort signal processing implementation and comparison of automotive spatial sound rendering strategies
publisher SpringerOpen
series EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing
issn 1687-4714
1687-4722
publishDate 2009-01-01
description <p/> <p>Design and implementation strategies of spatial sound rendering are investigated in this paper for automotive scenarios. Six design methods are implemented for various rendering modes with different number of passengers. Specifically, the downmixing algorithms aimed at balancing the front and back reproductions are developed for the 5.1-channel input. Other five algorithms based on inverse filtering are implemented in two approaches. The first approach utilizes binaural (Head-Related Transfer Functions HRTFs) measured in the car interior, whereas the second approach named the point-receiver model targets a point receiver positioned at the center of the passenger's head. The proposed processing algorithms were compared via objective and subjective experiments under various listening conditions. Test data were processed by the multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) method and the least significant difference (Fisher's LSD) method as a <it>post hoc</it> test to justify the statistical significance of the experimental data. The results indicate that inverse filtering algorithms are preferred for the single passenger mode. For the multipassenger mode, however, downmixing algorithms generally outperformed the other processing techniques.</p>
url http://asmp.eurasipjournals.com/content/2009/876297
work_keys_str_mv AT baimingsianr signalprocessingimplementationandcomparisonofautomotivespatialsoundrenderingstrategies
AT hongjhihren signalprocessingimplementationandcomparisonofautomotivespatialsoundrenderingstrategies
_version_ 1724795302195494912