Posterior tracking of multiple target elements

The posterior method of selecting and tracking the elements (objects) of a group radar target is considered. It allows for estimating the number of elements in a group target and carrying out their preliminary selection. It also helps in evaluating the tracking characteristics of the selected elemen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A. A. Moiseev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CRI «Electronics» 2020-06-01
Series:Радиопромышленность
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.radioprom.org/jour/article/view/697
id doaj-22b25ea1dba7472ba8a40099915c509e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22b25ea1dba7472ba8a40099915c509e2021-07-28T13:52:37ZengCRI «Electronics»Радиопромышленность2413-95992541-870X2020-06-01302253110.21778/2413-9599-2020-30-2-25-31381Posterior tracking of multiple target elementsA. A. Moiseev0Research and Production Enterprise Technos-RMThe posterior method of selecting and tracking the elements (objects) of a group radar target is considered. It allows for estimating the number of elements in a group target and carrying out their preliminary selection. It also helps in evaluating the tracking characteristics of the selected elements. A feature of the method is the preliminary accumulation of a data array to be processed further out of real-time. An histograms analysis is constructed to achieve that based on the processing results of the specified array. The corresponding algorithm provides for variations construction in the spread of the initial moments of the pulses relative to the average value in the packet, as well as modes in the packet and strobe. The decisive function in this case is defined as the product of these variations, and the decisive rule is to find the value of the spacing of the pulse numbers at which the minimum value of the decisive function is achieved. This value is interpreted as the number of elements in the group. The possibility of splitting a group into separate elements using the proposed approach is demonstrated. Mathematical modeling of the tracking procedure allowed comparing two possible methods. The first one is the “strongest neighbor” method, which provides for the choice of the continuation of the pulse with the maximum amplitude in the strobe. The second one is the “nearest neighbor” method, which provides the choice of the continuation of the pulse with the median moment of registration in the strobe. A comparative analysis of these two approaches demonstrated the preference of the “nearest neighbor” method as the one to provide less distortion of the time dependences of the amplitude and frequency. Evaluation of tracking parameters carried out according to the constructed histograms made it also possible to assess the probability of detecting an object during tracking.https://www.radioprom.org/jour/article/view/697group targetposterior methodhistogram methodselectiontrackinggatingstrongest neighbor methodnearest neighbor methoddecisive function
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. A. Moiseev
spellingShingle A. A. Moiseev
Posterior tracking of multiple target elements
Радиопромышленность
group target
posterior method
histogram method
selection
tracking
gating
strongest neighbor method
nearest neighbor method
decisive function
author_facet A. A. Moiseev
author_sort A. A. Moiseev
title Posterior tracking of multiple target elements
title_short Posterior tracking of multiple target elements
title_full Posterior tracking of multiple target elements
title_fullStr Posterior tracking of multiple target elements
title_full_unstemmed Posterior tracking of multiple target elements
title_sort posterior tracking of multiple target elements
publisher CRI «Electronics»
series Радиопромышленность
issn 2413-9599
2541-870X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description The posterior method of selecting and tracking the elements (objects) of a group radar target is considered. It allows for estimating the number of elements in a group target and carrying out their preliminary selection. It also helps in evaluating the tracking characteristics of the selected elements. A feature of the method is the preliminary accumulation of a data array to be processed further out of real-time. An histograms analysis is constructed to achieve that based on the processing results of the specified array. The corresponding algorithm provides for variations construction in the spread of the initial moments of the pulses relative to the average value in the packet, as well as modes in the packet and strobe. The decisive function in this case is defined as the product of these variations, and the decisive rule is to find the value of the spacing of the pulse numbers at which the minimum value of the decisive function is achieved. This value is interpreted as the number of elements in the group. The possibility of splitting a group into separate elements using the proposed approach is demonstrated. Mathematical modeling of the tracking procedure allowed comparing two possible methods. The first one is the “strongest neighbor” method, which provides for the choice of the continuation of the pulse with the maximum amplitude in the strobe. The second one is the “nearest neighbor” method, which provides the choice of the continuation of the pulse with the median moment of registration in the strobe. A comparative analysis of these two approaches demonstrated the preference of the “nearest neighbor” method as the one to provide less distortion of the time dependences of the amplitude and frequency. Evaluation of tracking parameters carried out according to the constructed histograms made it also possible to assess the probability of detecting an object during tracking.
topic group target
posterior method
histogram method
selection
tracking
gating
strongest neighbor method
nearest neighbor method
decisive function
url https://www.radioprom.org/jour/article/view/697
work_keys_str_mv AT aamoiseev posteriortrackingofmultipletargetelements
_version_ 1721270355004227584