Heterogeneous Differential Privacy

The massive collection of personal data by personalization systems has rendered the preservation of privacy of individuals more and more difficult. Most of the proposed approaches to preserve privacy in personalization systems usually address this issue uniformly across users, thus ignoring the fact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Alaggan, Sébastien Gambs, Anne-Marie Kermarrec
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Labor Dynamics Institute 2017-01-01
Series:The Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalprivacyconfidentiality.org/index.php/jpc/article/view/652
id doaj-22a0ffcffe384c30b927f0f4fd7d6472
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22a0ffcffe384c30b927f0f4fd7d64722020-11-25T02:44:01ZengLabor Dynamics InstituteThe Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality2575-85272017-01-017210.29012/jpc.v7i2.652Heterogeneous Differential PrivacyMohammad Alaggan0Sébastien Gambs1Anne-Marie Kermarrec2Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt; Univ Lyon, Inria, INSA Lyon,Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montréal, CanadaInria, Rennes, FranceThe massive collection of personal data by personalization systems has rendered the preservation of privacy of individuals more and more difficult. Most of the proposed approaches to preserve privacy in personalization systems usually address this issue uniformly across users, thus ignoring the fact that users have different privacy attitudes and expectations (even among their own personal data). In this paper, we propose to account for this non-uniformity of privacy expectations by introducing the concept of heterogeneous differential privacy. This notion captures both the variation of privacy expectations among users as well as across different pieces of information related to the same user. We also describe an explicit mechanism achieving heterogeneous differential privacy,  which is a modification of the Laplacian mechanism by Dwork, McSherry, Nissim and Smith. In a nutshell, this mechanism achieves heterogeneous differential privacy by manipulating the sensitivity of the function using a linear transformation on the input domain. Finally, we evaluate on real datasets the impact of the proposed  mechanism with respect to a semantic clustering task. The results of our experiments demonstrate that heterogeneous differential privacy can account for different privacy attitudes while sustaining a good level of utility as measured by the recall for the semantic clustering task.https://journalprivacyconfidentiality.org/index.php/jpc/article/view/652differential privacypersonalization systems
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Alaggan
Sébastien Gambs
Anne-Marie Kermarrec
spellingShingle Mohammad Alaggan
Sébastien Gambs
Anne-Marie Kermarrec
Heterogeneous Differential Privacy
The Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality
differential privacy
personalization systems
author_facet Mohammad Alaggan
Sébastien Gambs
Anne-Marie Kermarrec
author_sort Mohammad Alaggan
title Heterogeneous Differential Privacy
title_short Heterogeneous Differential Privacy
title_full Heterogeneous Differential Privacy
title_fullStr Heterogeneous Differential Privacy
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous Differential Privacy
title_sort heterogeneous differential privacy
publisher Labor Dynamics Institute
series The Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality
issn 2575-8527
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The massive collection of personal data by personalization systems has rendered the preservation of privacy of individuals more and more difficult. Most of the proposed approaches to preserve privacy in personalization systems usually address this issue uniformly across users, thus ignoring the fact that users have different privacy attitudes and expectations (even among their own personal data). In this paper, we propose to account for this non-uniformity of privacy expectations by introducing the concept of heterogeneous differential privacy. This notion captures both the variation of privacy expectations among users as well as across different pieces of information related to the same user. We also describe an explicit mechanism achieving heterogeneous differential privacy,  which is a modification of the Laplacian mechanism by Dwork, McSherry, Nissim and Smith. In a nutshell, this mechanism achieves heterogeneous differential privacy by manipulating the sensitivity of the function using a linear transformation on the input domain. Finally, we evaluate on real datasets the impact of the proposed  mechanism with respect to a semantic clustering task. The results of our experiments demonstrate that heterogeneous differential privacy can account for different privacy attitudes while sustaining a good level of utility as measured by the recall for the semantic clustering task.
topic differential privacy
personalization systems
url https://journalprivacyconfidentiality.org/index.php/jpc/article/view/652
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadalaggan heterogeneousdifferentialprivacy
AT sebastiengambs heterogeneousdifferentialprivacy
AT annemariekermarrec heterogeneousdifferentialprivacy
_version_ 1724768043626659840