Is the ‘n = 30 rule of thumb’ of ecological field studies reliable? A call for greater attention to the variability in our data
A common practice of experimental design in field ecology, which relies on the Central Limit Theorem, is the use of the ‘n = 30 rule of thumb’. I show here that papers published in Animal Biodiversity and Conservation during the period 2010–2013 adjust to this rule. Samples collected around this rel...
Main Author: | Martínez–Abraín, A. |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona
2014-06-01
|
Series: | Animal Biodiversity and Conservation |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://abc.museucienciesjournals.cat/files/ABC_37-1_2014_pp_95-100.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Is the ‘n = 30 rule of thumb’ of ecological field studies reliable? A call for greater attention to the variability in our data
by: A. Martínez–Abraín
Published: (2014-07-01) -
An Empirical Investigation of Tukey's Honestly Significant Difference Test with Variance Heterogeneity and Unequal Sample Sizes, Utilizing Kramer's Procedure and the Harmonic Mean
by: McKinney, William Lane
Published: (1976) -
Attenuation of the Squared Canonical Correlation Coefficient Under Varying Estimates of Score Reliability
by: Wilson, Celia M.
Published: (2010) -
Quantifying sentence acceptability measures: Reliability, bias, and variability
by: Steven Langsford, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
Effects of Cluster Sizes on Variance Components in Two-Stage Sampling
by: Valliant Richard, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)