Decision Criteria and Their Subjectivity in Construction Procurement Selection
Employing a suitable construction procurement system is crucial to project success. However,many clients select procurement systems in a cursory manner and some clientseven use a specific procurement system by default without deliberate choice. A systematicmethod for procurement selection would help...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
UTS ePRESS
2012-11-01
|
Series: | Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building |
Online Access: | https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/2888 |
id |
doaj-2282a6a48c4b474787d87ce29172e49c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2282a6a48c4b474787d87ce29172e49c2020-11-24T23:57:23ZengUTS ePRESSAustralasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building1835-63541837-91332012-11-0121708010.5130/ajceb.v2i1.28881857Decision Criteria and Their Subjectivity in Construction Procurement SelectionThomas Ng0Duc Luu1Swee Chen2University of Hong KongUniversity of NewcastleUniversity of NewcastleEmploying a suitable construction procurement system is crucial to project success. However,many clients select procurement systems in a cursory manner and some clientseven use a specific procurement system by default without deliberate choice. A systematicmethod for procurement selection would help clients to arrive at more informed decisions.The first step towards a systematic procurement selection method is to identify decisioncriteria pertinent to assessing the alternatives. This paper identifies the commonly consideredcriteria for procurement selection through a qualitative survey in Australia. The subjectivityof the identified criteria is considered and the effects on procurement selectionare examined. The results indicate that speed, complexity, flexibility, responsibility, qualitylevel, risk allocation, and price competition cannot be easily gauged by objective means,and a misperception of the degree of fulfilment of any of these criteria could affect theoutcome of procurement selection.https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/2888 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Thomas Ng Duc Luu Swee Chen |
spellingShingle |
Thomas Ng Duc Luu Swee Chen Decision Criteria and Their Subjectivity in Construction Procurement Selection Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building |
author_facet |
Thomas Ng Duc Luu Swee Chen |
author_sort |
Thomas Ng |
title |
Decision Criteria and Their Subjectivity in Construction Procurement Selection |
title_short |
Decision Criteria and Their Subjectivity in Construction Procurement Selection |
title_full |
Decision Criteria and Their Subjectivity in Construction Procurement Selection |
title_fullStr |
Decision Criteria and Their Subjectivity in Construction Procurement Selection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Decision Criteria and Their Subjectivity in Construction Procurement Selection |
title_sort |
decision criteria and their subjectivity in construction procurement selection |
publisher |
UTS ePRESS |
series |
Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building |
issn |
1835-6354 1837-9133 |
publishDate |
2012-11-01 |
description |
Employing a suitable construction procurement system is crucial to project success. However,many clients select procurement systems in a cursory manner and some clientseven use a specific procurement system by default without deliberate choice. A systematicmethod for procurement selection would help clients to arrive at more informed decisions.The first step towards a systematic procurement selection method is to identify decisioncriteria pertinent to assessing the alternatives. This paper identifies the commonly consideredcriteria for procurement selection through a qualitative survey in Australia. The subjectivityof the identified criteria is considered and the effects on procurement selectionare examined. The results indicate that speed, complexity, flexibility, responsibility, qualitylevel, risk allocation, and price competition cannot be easily gauged by objective means,and a misperception of the degree of fulfilment of any of these criteria could affect theoutcome of procurement selection. |
url |
https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/AJCEB/article/view/2888 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT thomasng decisioncriteriaandtheirsubjectivityinconstructionprocurementselection AT ducluu decisioncriteriaandtheirsubjectivityinconstructionprocurementselection AT sweechen decisioncriteriaandtheirsubjectivityinconstructionprocurementselection |
_version_ |
1725454270117969920 |