A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose/Objective</p> <p>This is a prospective comparison of weekly cisplatin to weekly paclitaxel as concurrent chemotherapy with standard radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.</p> <p>Materials/Methods</p> <p>B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charafeddine Maya, Abboud Mirna, Khalil Ali, Shamseddine Ali, Geara Fady B, Seoud Muhieddine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-09-01
Series:Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.ro-journal.com/content/5/1/84
id doaj-22792ed4710547b9b2836d8051a1e1c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22792ed4710547b9b2836d8051a1e1c82020-11-24T23:28:06ZengBMCRadiation Oncology1748-717X2010-09-01518410.1186/1748-717X-5-84A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancerCharafeddine MayaAbboud MirnaKhalil AliShamseddine AliGeara Fady BSeoud Muhieddine<p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose/Objective</p> <p>This is a prospective comparison of weekly cisplatin to weekly paclitaxel as concurrent chemotherapy with standard radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.</p> <p>Materials/Methods</p> <p>Between May 2000 and May 2004, 31 women with FIGO stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer or with postsurgical pelvic recurrence were enrolled into this phase II study and randomized to receive on a weekly basis either 40 mg/m<sup>2 </sup>Cisplatin (group I; 16 patients) or 50 mg/m<sup>2 </sup>paclitaxel (group II; 15 patients) concurrently with radiotherapy. Median total dose to point A was 74 Gy (range: 66-92 Gy) for group I and 66 Gy (range: 40-98 Gy) for group II. Median follow-up time was 46 months.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Patient and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean number of chemotherapy cycles was also comparable with 87% and 80% of patients receiving at least 4 doses in groups I and II, respectively. Seven patients (44%) of group I and 8 patients (53%) of group II developed tumor recurrence. The Median Survival time was not reached for Group I and 53 months for group II. The proportion of patients surviving at 2 and 5 years was 78% and 54% for group I and 73% and 43% for group II respectively.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This small prospective study shows that weekly paclitaxel does not provide any clinical advantage over weekly cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiation for advanced carcinoma of the cervix.</p> http://www.ro-journal.com/content/5/1/84
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charafeddine Maya
Abboud Mirna
Khalil Ali
Shamseddine Ali
Geara Fady B
Seoud Muhieddine
spellingShingle Charafeddine Maya
Abboud Mirna
Khalil Ali
Shamseddine Ali
Geara Fady B
Seoud Muhieddine
A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer
Radiation Oncology
author_facet Charafeddine Maya
Abboud Mirna
Khalil Ali
Shamseddine Ali
Geara Fady B
Seoud Muhieddine
author_sort Charafeddine Maya
title A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer
title_short A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer
title_full A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer
title_fullStr A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer
title_sort phase ii randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer
publisher BMC
series Radiation Oncology
issn 1748-717X
publishDate 2010-09-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Purpose/Objective</p> <p>This is a prospective comparison of weekly cisplatin to weekly paclitaxel as concurrent chemotherapy with standard radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.</p> <p>Materials/Methods</p> <p>Between May 2000 and May 2004, 31 women with FIGO stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer or with postsurgical pelvic recurrence were enrolled into this phase II study and randomized to receive on a weekly basis either 40 mg/m<sup>2 </sup>Cisplatin (group I; 16 patients) or 50 mg/m<sup>2 </sup>paclitaxel (group II; 15 patients) concurrently with radiotherapy. Median total dose to point A was 74 Gy (range: 66-92 Gy) for group I and 66 Gy (range: 40-98 Gy) for group II. Median follow-up time was 46 months.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Patient and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean number of chemotherapy cycles was also comparable with 87% and 80% of patients receiving at least 4 doses in groups I and II, respectively. Seven patients (44%) of group I and 8 patients (53%) of group II developed tumor recurrence. The Median Survival time was not reached for Group I and 53 months for group II. The proportion of patients surviving at 2 and 5 years was 78% and 54% for group I and 73% and 43% for group II respectively.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This small prospective study shows that weekly paclitaxel does not provide any clinical advantage over weekly cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiation for advanced carcinoma of the cervix.</p>
url http://www.ro-journal.com/content/5/1/84
work_keys_str_mv AT charafeddinemaya aphaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT abboudmirna aphaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT khalilali aphaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT shamseddineali aphaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT gearafadyb aphaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT seoudmuhieddine aphaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT charafeddinemaya phaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT abboudmirna phaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT khalilali phaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT shamseddineali phaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT gearafadyb phaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
AT seoudmuhieddine phaseiirandomizedtrialcomparingradiotherapywithconcurrentweeklycisplatinorweeklypaclitaxelinpatientswithadvancedcervicalcancer
_version_ 1725550780284403712