mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps.

BACKGROUND:Mobile health (mHealth) has undergone exponential growth in recent years. Patients and healthcare professionals are increasingly using health-related applications, at the same time as concerns about ethical issues, bias, conflicts of interest and privacy are emerging. The general aim of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rocío de la Vega, Jordi Miró
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4085095?pdf=render
id doaj-22702903ad2f4add87613b1869b1ab85
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22702903ad2f4add87613b1869b1ab852020-11-24T22:00:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0197e10131210.1371/journal.pone.0101312mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps.Rocío de la VegaJordi MiróBACKGROUND:Mobile health (mHealth) has undergone exponential growth in recent years. Patients and healthcare professionals are increasingly using health-related applications, at the same time as concerns about ethical issues, bias, conflicts of interest and privacy are emerging. The general aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of development of mHealth. METHODS AND FINDINGS:To exemplify the issues, we made a systematic review of the pain-related apps available in scientific databases (Medline, Web of Science, Gale, Psycinfo, etc.) and the main application shops (App Store, Blackberry App World, Google Play, Nokia Store and Windows Phone Store). Only applications (designed for both patients and clinicians) focused on pain education, assessment and treatment were included. Of the 47 papers published on 34 apps in scientific databases, none were available in the app shops. A total of 283 pain-related apps were found in the five shops searched, but no articles have been published on these apps. The main limitation of this review is that we did not look at all stores in all countries. CONCLUSIONS:There is a huge gap between the scientific and commercial faces of mHealth. Specific efforts are needed to facilitate knowledge translation and regulate commercial health-related apps.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4085095?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rocío de la Vega
Jordi Miró
spellingShingle Rocío de la Vega
Jordi Miró
mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Rocío de la Vega
Jordi Miró
author_sort Rocío de la Vega
title mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps.
title_short mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps.
title_full mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps.
title_fullStr mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps.
title_full_unstemmed mHealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps.
title_sort mhealth: a strategic field without a solid scientific soul. a systematic review of pain-related apps.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description BACKGROUND:Mobile health (mHealth) has undergone exponential growth in recent years. Patients and healthcare professionals are increasingly using health-related applications, at the same time as concerns about ethical issues, bias, conflicts of interest and privacy are emerging. The general aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the current state of development of mHealth. METHODS AND FINDINGS:To exemplify the issues, we made a systematic review of the pain-related apps available in scientific databases (Medline, Web of Science, Gale, Psycinfo, etc.) and the main application shops (App Store, Blackberry App World, Google Play, Nokia Store and Windows Phone Store). Only applications (designed for both patients and clinicians) focused on pain education, assessment and treatment were included. Of the 47 papers published on 34 apps in scientific databases, none were available in the app shops. A total of 283 pain-related apps were found in the five shops searched, but no articles have been published on these apps. The main limitation of this review is that we did not look at all stores in all countries. CONCLUSIONS:There is a huge gap between the scientific and commercial faces of mHealth. Specific efforts are needed to facilitate knowledge translation and regulate commercial health-related apps.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4085095?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT rociodelavega mhealthastrategicfieldwithoutasolidscientificsoulasystematicreviewofpainrelatedapps
AT jordimiro mhealthastrategicfieldwithoutasolidscientificsoulasystematicreviewofpainrelatedapps
_version_ 1725845346832089088