Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object
This paper, through a realist reading of Husserlian phenomenology, aims to explain how the consciousness-sense has access to reality and, in general, to objectivity. There is a ‘strife’ between the essence of a thing and the specific concreteness in which it always becomes manifest, such that the id...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
De Gruyter
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Open Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0022 |
id |
doaj-226e52f7bc7e49d7b126a16386d09ce5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-226e52f7bc7e49d7b126a16386d09ce52021-09-05T20:51:23ZengDe GruyterOpen Philosophy2543-88752018-10-011129930910.1515/opphil-2018-0022opphil-2018-0022Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the ObjectArmogida Giuseppe0University of Roma Tre,Rome, ItalyThis paper, through a realist reading of Husserlian phenomenology, aims to explain how the consciousness-sense has access to reality and, in general, to objectivity. There is a ‘strife’ between the essence of a thing and the specific concreteness in which it always becomes manifest, such that the identical object is indicated by changeable predicates, but at the same time always distinguishes itself from them. Language can express the evidence of the thing - which makes the determinable aspects of the thing exist and which is inexpressible through definitions - only “for conjectures”, showing the difference between its own expression and the thing. And it can do this by analogy, the only device that exhibits the antinomic relationship between the object and its determinations, and, in the meantime, makes possible not so much their composition, but rather their transformation. Analogy, in fact, operating through a logic of contradiction, grasps, within each object, the tension between the element of permanence and the element of emergency; shows how the object is a unity-without-a-mixture of absolutely distinct forms; and so it comes to think about the relationship between the in-definable forms of the possible representations of the thing and the impossible expression of its singularity.https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0022husserlian phenomenologyontologystructure of objectssubstance and appearancessingularityrealism and interpretationconjecturedialetheic logicgluon theoryanalogy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Armogida Giuseppe |
spellingShingle |
Armogida Giuseppe Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object Open Philosophy husserlian phenomenology ontology structure of objects substance and appearances singularity realism and interpretation conjecture dialetheic logic gluon theory analogy |
author_facet |
Armogida Giuseppe |
author_sort |
Armogida Giuseppe |
title |
Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object |
title_short |
Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object |
title_full |
Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object |
title_fullStr |
Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object |
title_sort |
ontology of the possible: on the structure of the object |
publisher |
De Gruyter |
series |
Open Philosophy |
issn |
2543-8875 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
This paper, through a realist reading of Husserlian phenomenology, aims to explain how the consciousness-sense has access to reality and, in general, to objectivity. There is a ‘strife’ between the essence of a thing and the specific concreteness in which it always becomes manifest, such that the identical object is indicated by changeable predicates, but at the same time always distinguishes itself from them. Language can express the evidence of the thing - which makes the determinable aspects of the thing exist and which is inexpressible through definitions - only “for conjectures”, showing the difference between its own expression and the thing. And it can do this by analogy, the only device that exhibits the antinomic relationship between the object and its determinations, and, in the meantime, makes possible not so much their composition, but rather their transformation. Analogy, in fact, operating through a logic of contradiction, grasps, within each object, the tension between the element of permanence and the element of emergency; shows how the object is a unity-without-a-mixture of absolutely distinct forms; and so it comes to think about the relationship between the in-definable forms of the possible representations of the thing and the impossible expression of its singularity. |
topic |
husserlian phenomenology ontology structure of objects substance and appearances singularity realism and interpretation conjecture dialetheic logic gluon theory analogy |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0022 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT armogidagiuseppe ontologyofthepossibleonthestructureoftheobject |
_version_ |
1717783858443714560 |