Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object

This paper, through a realist reading of Husserlian phenomenology, aims to explain how the consciousness-sense has access to reality and, in general, to objectivity. There is a ‘strife’ between the essence of a thing and the specific concreteness in which it always becomes manifest, such that the id...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Armogida Giuseppe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2018-10-01
Series:Open Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0022
id doaj-226e52f7bc7e49d7b126a16386d09ce5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-226e52f7bc7e49d7b126a16386d09ce52021-09-05T20:51:23ZengDe GruyterOpen Philosophy2543-88752018-10-011129930910.1515/opphil-2018-0022opphil-2018-0022Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the ObjectArmogida Giuseppe0University of Roma Tre,Rome, ItalyThis paper, through a realist reading of Husserlian phenomenology, aims to explain how the consciousness-sense has access to reality and, in general, to objectivity. There is a ‘strife’ between the essence of a thing and the specific concreteness in which it always becomes manifest, such that the identical object is indicated by changeable predicates, but at the same time always distinguishes itself from them. Language can express the evidence of the thing - which makes the determinable aspects of the thing exist and which is inexpressible through definitions - only “for conjectures”, showing the difference between its own expression and the thing. And it can do this by analogy, the only device that exhibits the antinomic relationship between the object and its determinations, and, in the meantime, makes possible not so much their composition, but rather their transformation. Analogy, in fact, operating through a logic of contradiction, grasps, within each object, the tension between the element of permanence and the element of emergency; shows how the object is a unity-without-a-mixture of absolutely distinct forms; and so it comes to think about the relationship between the in-definable forms of the possible representations of the thing and the impossible expression of its singularity.https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0022husserlian phenomenologyontologystructure of objectssubstance and appearancessingularityrealism and interpretationconjecturedialetheic logicgluon theoryanalogy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Armogida Giuseppe
spellingShingle Armogida Giuseppe
Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object
Open Philosophy
husserlian phenomenology
ontology
structure of objects
substance and appearances
singularity
realism and interpretation
conjecture
dialetheic logic
gluon theory
analogy
author_facet Armogida Giuseppe
author_sort Armogida Giuseppe
title Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object
title_short Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object
title_full Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object
title_fullStr Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object
title_full_unstemmed Ontology of The Possible: on the Structure of the Object
title_sort ontology of the possible: on the structure of the object
publisher De Gruyter
series Open Philosophy
issn 2543-8875
publishDate 2018-10-01
description This paper, through a realist reading of Husserlian phenomenology, aims to explain how the consciousness-sense has access to reality and, in general, to objectivity. There is a ‘strife’ between the essence of a thing and the specific concreteness in which it always becomes manifest, such that the identical object is indicated by changeable predicates, but at the same time always distinguishes itself from them. Language can express the evidence of the thing - which makes the determinable aspects of the thing exist and which is inexpressible through definitions - only “for conjectures”, showing the difference between its own expression and the thing. And it can do this by analogy, the only device that exhibits the antinomic relationship between the object and its determinations, and, in the meantime, makes possible not so much their composition, but rather their transformation. Analogy, in fact, operating through a logic of contradiction, grasps, within each object, the tension between the element of permanence and the element of emergency; shows how the object is a unity-without-a-mixture of absolutely distinct forms; and so it comes to think about the relationship between the in-definable forms of the possible representations of the thing and the impossible expression of its singularity.
topic husserlian phenomenology
ontology
structure of objects
substance and appearances
singularity
realism and interpretation
conjecture
dialetheic logic
gluon theory
analogy
url https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2018-0022
work_keys_str_mv AT armogidagiuseppe ontologyofthepossibleonthestructureoftheobject
_version_ 1717783858443714560