Knowledge implementation in health care management: a qualitative study

• Main Authors: G. Roohi, G. Mahmoodi, H. Khoddam
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2020-03-01
• Series: BMC Health Services Research
• Subjects: Research implementation; PARIHS framework; Healthcare management system; Iran; Content analysis
• Online Access: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-020-5043-8

Abstract Background The gap between knowledge and practice is a global issue, which increases wasteful spending in healthcare. There are several models and frameworks to address this gap and try to solve the challenge. Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework highlights the interaction of three main elements: evidence, context and facilitation, to implement research into practice, successfully. This framework can use as a tool to evaluate the situation and guide the changing. This study conducted to explain the status of knowledge implementation in Iran’s healthcare management system. Methods This qualitative study was done by using a directive content analysis approach through conducting in-depth, structured interviews with 15 health managers based on the PARIHS framework. Guiding questions were based on the three main elements of the framework: evidence, context and facilitation. The content of the interviews entered into the Qualitative Data Analysis software (MAXQDA version 10) and, then, analyzed. Results The most common source of evidence used by managers for decision-making was local information and previous experience. Evaluation more emphasized compared to other sub-elements of context, i.e. culture and leadership. In terms of facilitation, performing tasks by others was the dominant opinion. Conclusion Our results showed that managers in the healthcare system of Iran use their own and other manager’s experience and the local information for decision-making and have no ideas about facilitation.