The impact of protected area governance and management capacity on ecosystem function in Central America.

Protected areas (PAs) are a prominent approach to maintaining and enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services. A critical question for safeguarding these resources is how PA governance processes and management structures influence their effectiveness. We conduct an impact evaluation of 12 PAs in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos L Muñoz Brenes, Kelly W Jones, Peter Schlesinger, Juan Robalino, Lee Vierling
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6193709?pdf=render
id doaj-2265748d4a55447288868f5bec4be47d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2265748d4a55447288868f5bec4be47d2020-11-25T02:49:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-011310e020596410.1371/journal.pone.0205964The impact of protected area governance and management capacity on ecosystem function in Central America.Carlos L Muñoz BrenesKelly W JonesPeter SchlesingerJuan RobalinoLee VierlingProtected areas (PAs) are a prominent approach to maintaining and enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services. A critical question for safeguarding these resources is how PA governance processes and management structures influence their effectiveness. We conduct an impact evaluation of 12 PAs in three Central American countries to assess how processes in management restrictions, management capacity, and decentralization affect the annual change in the satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). NDVI varies with greenness that relates to plant production, biomass, and important ecosystem functions related to biodiversity and ecosystem services such as water quality and carbon storage. Any loss of vegetation cover in the form of deforestation or degradation would show up as a decrease in NDVI values over time and gains in vegetation cover and regeneration as an increase in NDVI values. Management restriction categories are based on international classifications of strict versus multiple-use PAs, and capacity and decentralization categories are based on key informant interviews of PA managers. We use matching to create a counterfactual of non-protected observations and a matching estimator and regression to estimate treatment effects of each sub-sample. On average, strict and multiple-use PAs have a significant and positive effect on NDVI compared to non-protected land uses. Both high and low decentralized PAs also positively affect NDVI. High capacity PAs have a positive and significant effect on NDVI, while low capacity PAs have a negative effect on NDVI. Our findings advance knowledge on how governance and management influence PA effectiveness and suggest that capacity may be more important than governance type or management restrictions in maintaining and enhancing NDVI. This paper also provides a guide for future studies to incorporate measures of PA governance and management into impact evaluations.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6193709?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carlos L Muñoz Brenes
Kelly W Jones
Peter Schlesinger
Juan Robalino
Lee Vierling
spellingShingle Carlos L Muñoz Brenes
Kelly W Jones
Peter Schlesinger
Juan Robalino
Lee Vierling
The impact of protected area governance and management capacity on ecosystem function in Central America.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Carlos L Muñoz Brenes
Kelly W Jones
Peter Schlesinger
Juan Robalino
Lee Vierling
author_sort Carlos L Muñoz Brenes
title The impact of protected area governance and management capacity on ecosystem function in Central America.
title_short The impact of protected area governance and management capacity on ecosystem function in Central America.
title_full The impact of protected area governance and management capacity on ecosystem function in Central America.
title_fullStr The impact of protected area governance and management capacity on ecosystem function in Central America.
title_full_unstemmed The impact of protected area governance and management capacity on ecosystem function in Central America.
title_sort impact of protected area governance and management capacity on ecosystem function in central america.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Protected areas (PAs) are a prominent approach to maintaining and enhancing biodiversity and ecosystem services. A critical question for safeguarding these resources is how PA governance processes and management structures influence their effectiveness. We conduct an impact evaluation of 12 PAs in three Central American countries to assess how processes in management restrictions, management capacity, and decentralization affect the annual change in the satellite-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). NDVI varies with greenness that relates to plant production, biomass, and important ecosystem functions related to biodiversity and ecosystem services such as water quality and carbon storage. Any loss of vegetation cover in the form of deforestation or degradation would show up as a decrease in NDVI values over time and gains in vegetation cover and regeneration as an increase in NDVI values. Management restriction categories are based on international classifications of strict versus multiple-use PAs, and capacity and decentralization categories are based on key informant interviews of PA managers. We use matching to create a counterfactual of non-protected observations and a matching estimator and regression to estimate treatment effects of each sub-sample. On average, strict and multiple-use PAs have a significant and positive effect on NDVI compared to non-protected land uses. Both high and low decentralized PAs also positively affect NDVI. High capacity PAs have a positive and significant effect on NDVI, while low capacity PAs have a negative effect on NDVI. Our findings advance knowledge on how governance and management influence PA effectiveness and suggest that capacity may be more important than governance type or management restrictions in maintaining and enhancing NDVI. This paper also provides a guide for future studies to incorporate measures of PA governance and management into impact evaluations.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC6193709?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT carloslmunozbrenes theimpactofprotectedareagovernanceandmanagementcapacityonecosystemfunctionincentralamerica
AT kellywjones theimpactofprotectedareagovernanceandmanagementcapacityonecosystemfunctionincentralamerica
AT peterschlesinger theimpactofprotectedareagovernanceandmanagementcapacityonecosystemfunctionincentralamerica
AT juanrobalino theimpactofprotectedareagovernanceandmanagementcapacityonecosystemfunctionincentralamerica
AT leevierling theimpactofprotectedareagovernanceandmanagementcapacityonecosystemfunctionincentralamerica
AT carloslmunozbrenes impactofprotectedareagovernanceandmanagementcapacityonecosystemfunctionincentralamerica
AT kellywjones impactofprotectedareagovernanceandmanagementcapacityonecosystemfunctionincentralamerica
AT peterschlesinger impactofprotectedareagovernanceandmanagementcapacityonecosystemfunctionincentralamerica
AT juanrobalino impactofprotectedareagovernanceandmanagementcapacityonecosystemfunctionincentralamerica
AT leevierling impactofprotectedareagovernanceandmanagementcapacityonecosystemfunctionincentralamerica
_version_ 1724743599795470336