Refugee or Migrant Crisis? Labels, Perceived Agency, and Sentiment Polarity in Online Discussions

In recent years, increasing attention has been dedicated to the hazardous and volatile situation in the Middle East, a crisis which has pushed many to flee their countries and seek refuge in neighboring countries or in Europe. In describing or discussing these tragic events, labels such as “European...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ju-Sung Lee, Adina Nerghes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2018-07-01
Series:Social Media + Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118785638
id doaj-226392a63bfd46d291fa5bb3cc1fc722
record_format Article
spelling doaj-226392a63bfd46d291fa5bb3cc1fc7222020-11-25T02:54:19ZengSAGE PublishingSocial Media + Society2056-30512018-07-01410.1177/2056305118785638Refugee or Migrant Crisis? Labels, Perceived Agency, and Sentiment Polarity in Online DiscussionsJu-Sung Lee0Adina Nerghes1Erasmus University Rotterdam, The NetherlandsKNAW Humanities Cluster, The NetherlandsIn recent years, increasing attention has been dedicated to the hazardous and volatile situation in the Middle East, a crisis which has pushed many to flee their countries and seek refuge in neighboring countries or in Europe. In describing or discussing these tragic events, labels such as “European migrant crisis” and “European refugee crisis” started being widely used by the media, politicians, and the online world alike. The use of such labels has the potential to dictate the ways in which displaced people are received and perceived. With this study, we investigate label use in social media (specifically YouTube), the emergent patterns of labeling that can cause further disaffection and tension or elicit sympathy, and the sentiments associated with the different labels. Our findings suggest that migration issues are being framed not only through labels characterizing the crisis but also by their describing the individuals themselves. Using topic modeling and sentiment analysis jointly, our study offers valuable insights into the direction of public sentiment and the nature of discussions surrounding this significant societal crisis, as well as the nature of online opinion sharing. We conclude by proposing a four-dimensional model of label interpretation in relation to sentiment—that accounts for perceived agency, economic cost, permanence, and threat, and identifies threat and agency to be most impactful. This perspective reveals important influential aspects of labels and frames that may shape online public opinion and alter attitudes toward those directly affected by the crisis.https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118785638
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ju-Sung Lee
Adina Nerghes
spellingShingle Ju-Sung Lee
Adina Nerghes
Refugee or Migrant Crisis? Labels, Perceived Agency, and Sentiment Polarity in Online Discussions
Social Media + Society
author_facet Ju-Sung Lee
Adina Nerghes
author_sort Ju-Sung Lee
title Refugee or Migrant Crisis? Labels, Perceived Agency, and Sentiment Polarity in Online Discussions
title_short Refugee or Migrant Crisis? Labels, Perceived Agency, and Sentiment Polarity in Online Discussions
title_full Refugee or Migrant Crisis? Labels, Perceived Agency, and Sentiment Polarity in Online Discussions
title_fullStr Refugee or Migrant Crisis? Labels, Perceived Agency, and Sentiment Polarity in Online Discussions
title_full_unstemmed Refugee or Migrant Crisis? Labels, Perceived Agency, and Sentiment Polarity in Online Discussions
title_sort refugee or migrant crisis? labels, perceived agency, and sentiment polarity in online discussions
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Social Media + Society
issn 2056-3051
publishDate 2018-07-01
description In recent years, increasing attention has been dedicated to the hazardous and volatile situation in the Middle East, a crisis which has pushed many to flee their countries and seek refuge in neighboring countries or in Europe. In describing or discussing these tragic events, labels such as “European migrant crisis” and “European refugee crisis” started being widely used by the media, politicians, and the online world alike. The use of such labels has the potential to dictate the ways in which displaced people are received and perceived. With this study, we investigate label use in social media (specifically YouTube), the emergent patterns of labeling that can cause further disaffection and tension or elicit sympathy, and the sentiments associated with the different labels. Our findings suggest that migration issues are being framed not only through labels characterizing the crisis but also by their describing the individuals themselves. Using topic modeling and sentiment analysis jointly, our study offers valuable insights into the direction of public sentiment and the nature of discussions surrounding this significant societal crisis, as well as the nature of online opinion sharing. We conclude by proposing a four-dimensional model of label interpretation in relation to sentiment—that accounts for perceived agency, economic cost, permanence, and threat, and identifies threat and agency to be most impactful. This perspective reveals important influential aspects of labels and frames that may shape online public opinion and alter attitudes toward those directly affected by the crisis.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118785638
work_keys_str_mv AT jusunglee refugeeormigrantcrisislabelsperceivedagencyandsentimentpolarityinonlinediscussions
AT adinanerghes refugeeormigrantcrisislabelsperceivedagencyandsentimentpolarityinonlinediscussions
_version_ 1724721990291423232