TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction

Background:. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure with many options regarding graft choice and graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare suspensory and aperture fixation in terms of femoral osseous integration of the bone block after ACL re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shahram Shawn Yari, MD, Ashraf N. El Naga, MD, Amar Patel, MD, Ali Asaf Qadeer, MD, Anup Shah, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-06-01
Series:JBJS Open Access
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00057
id doaj-225e5c3883434a78b7b6016b6ef49f34
record_format Article
spelling doaj-225e5c3883434a78b7b6016b6ef49f342020-11-25T04:03:47ZengWolters KluwerJBJS Open Access2472-72452020-06-0152e005710.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00057JBJSOA1900057TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL ReconstructionShahram Shawn Yari, MD0Ashraf N. El Naga, MD1Amar Patel, MD2Ali Asaf Qadeer, MD3Anup Shah, MD41 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California3 Departments of Radiology (A.P.) and Orthopedic Surgery (A.S.), Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, Texas1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas3 Departments of Radiology (A.P.) and Orthopedic Surgery (A.S.), Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Houston, TexasBackground:. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure with many options regarding graft choice and graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare suspensory and aperture fixation in terms of femoral osseous integration of the bone block after ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. Methods:. After institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained, 37 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. The patients were randomized according to the graft femoral fixation technique, which was with either a suspensory device (Arthrex TightRope) or aperture fixation by a biocomposite interference screw (Arthrex BioComposite Interference Screw or DePuy Mitek MILAGRO Interference Screw). Tibial fixation, performed with a biocomposite screw and knotless anchor, was identical in all patients. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan at 6 months to evaluate bone block incorporation of the femoral graft within the femoral tunnel, which was the study’s primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included a postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, range-of-motion measures, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Demographic data were collected. Results:. Thirty-three patients (89%) completed the study’s 6-month follow-up, at which time the femoral ossification score was significantly greater in the aperture fixation group (p = 0.025). There was no substantial difference between the 2 groups with regard to any other outcome measure. Conclusions:. Performing Achilles tendon allograft ACL reconstruction with femoral aperture fixation results in greater femoral bone block incorporation at 6 months postoperatively compared with what is seen after suspensory fixation. Level of Evidence:. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00057
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shahram Shawn Yari, MD
Ashraf N. El Naga, MD
Amar Patel, MD
Ali Asaf Qadeer, MD
Anup Shah, MD
spellingShingle Shahram Shawn Yari, MD
Ashraf N. El Naga, MD
Amar Patel, MD
Ali Asaf Qadeer, MD
Anup Shah, MD
TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction
JBJS Open Access
author_facet Shahram Shawn Yari, MD
Ashraf N. El Naga, MD
Amar Patel, MD
Ali Asaf Qadeer, MD
Anup Shah, MD
author_sort Shahram Shawn Yari, MD
title TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction
title_short TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction
title_full TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction
title_fullStr TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction
title_sort tightrope versus biocomposite interference screw for fixation in allograft acl reconstruction
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series JBJS Open Access
issn 2472-7245
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Background:. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure with many options regarding graft choice and graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare suspensory and aperture fixation in terms of femoral osseous integration of the bone block after ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. Methods:. After institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained, 37 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. The patients were randomized according to the graft femoral fixation technique, which was with either a suspensory device (Arthrex TightRope) or aperture fixation by a biocomposite interference screw (Arthrex BioComposite Interference Screw or DePuy Mitek MILAGRO Interference Screw). Tibial fixation, performed with a biocomposite screw and knotless anchor, was identical in all patients. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan at 6 months to evaluate bone block incorporation of the femoral graft within the femoral tunnel, which was the study’s primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included a postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, range-of-motion measures, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Demographic data were collected. Results:. Thirty-three patients (89%) completed the study’s 6-month follow-up, at which time the femoral ossification score was significantly greater in the aperture fixation group (p = 0.025). There was no substantial difference between the 2 groups with regard to any other outcome measure. Conclusions:. Performing Achilles tendon allograft ACL reconstruction with femoral aperture fixation results in greater femoral bone block incorporation at 6 months postoperatively compared with what is seen after suspensory fixation. Level of Evidence:. Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
url http://journals.lww.com/jbjsoa/fulltext/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00057
work_keys_str_mv AT shahramshawnyarimd tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstruction
AT ashrafnelnagamd tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstruction
AT amarpatelmd tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstruction
AT aliasafqadeermd tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstruction
AT anupshahmd tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstruction
_version_ 1724439287300096000