Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests

How did the issue of deadwood become an important part of management policies for forest biodiversity? The authors provide a number of answers on the emergence and inclusion of deadwood in management policies.<br>How did the issue of biodiversity emerge? Why are certain categories of living be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Philippe Deuffic and Christophe Bouget
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE) 2011-03-01
Series:Sciences, Eaux & Territoires
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.set-revue.fr/sites/default/files/archives/article_23.pdf
id doaj-225731f409da49248bdd4e0c5bb95640
record_format Article
spelling doaj-225731f409da49248bdd4e0c5bb956402020-11-25T03:51:59ZfraInstitut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE)Sciences, Eaux & Territoires2109-30161775-37832011-03-01201103bis132138Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forestsPhilippe Deuffic and Christophe BougetHow did the issue of deadwood become an important part of management policies for forest biodiversity? The authors provide a number of answers on the emergence and inclusion of deadwood in management policies.<br>How did the issue of biodiversity emerge? Why are certain categories of living beings ignored? How did the issue of deadwood land on the public-policy agenda? To answer these questions, we used the approach established by Trom and Zimmerman (2001), which identifies the necessary steps toward "institutionalisation" of a public problem, i.e. public criticism of a disturbance, objectivisation of the problem, networking of stakeholders and acceptance of the problem by stakeholders in the field. Using the example of efforts to conserve deadwood in forests, we show that placing an issue on the public agenda does not mean all aspects of biodiversity are involved. In addition, certain potential stakeholders such as forest owners are not inclined to adopt these policies. It is not that they contest the legitimacy of the policy, but rather the procedural aspects from which they feel excluded.http://www.set-revue.fr/sites/default/files/archives/article_23.pdfSOCIOLOGYDEAD WOODFORESTBIODIVERSITYECOLOGY
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Philippe Deuffic and Christophe Bouget
spellingShingle Philippe Deuffic and Christophe Bouget
Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests
Sciences, Eaux & Territoires
SOCIOLOGY
DEAD WOOD
FOREST
BIODIVERSITY
ECOLOGY
author_facet Philippe Deuffic and Christophe Bouget
author_sort Philippe Deuffic and Christophe Bouget
title Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests
title_short Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests
title_full Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests
title_fullStr Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests
title_full_unstemmed Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests Making biodiversity a public problem – The case of dead wood in forests
title_sort making biodiversity a public problem – the case of dead wood in forests making biodiversity a public problem – the case of dead wood in forests
publisher Institut national de recherche pour l’agriculture, l’alimentation et l’environnement (INRAE)
series Sciences, Eaux & Territoires
issn 2109-3016
1775-3783
publishDate 2011-03-01
description How did the issue of deadwood become an important part of management policies for forest biodiversity? The authors provide a number of answers on the emergence and inclusion of deadwood in management policies.<br>How did the issue of biodiversity emerge? Why are certain categories of living beings ignored? How did the issue of deadwood land on the public-policy agenda? To answer these questions, we used the approach established by Trom and Zimmerman (2001), which identifies the necessary steps toward "institutionalisation" of a public problem, i.e. public criticism of a disturbance, objectivisation of the problem, networking of stakeholders and acceptance of the problem by stakeholders in the field. Using the example of efforts to conserve deadwood in forests, we show that placing an issue on the public agenda does not mean all aspects of biodiversity are involved. In addition, certain potential stakeholders such as forest owners are not inclined to adopt these policies. It is not that they contest the legitimacy of the policy, but rather the procedural aspects from which they feel excluded.
topic SOCIOLOGY
DEAD WOOD
FOREST
BIODIVERSITY
ECOLOGY
url http://www.set-revue.fr/sites/default/files/archives/article_23.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT philippedeufficandchristophebouget makingbiodiversityapublicproblemthecaseofdeadwoodinforestsmakingbiodiversityapublicproblemthecaseofdeadwoodinforests
_version_ 1724485056073826304