‘Pieces of kit’ are not enough: the role of infrastructure in community resilience

Flood resilience is about the ability of people and places to cope with, recover from and adapt to flooding in ways that maintain quality of life and identities. In the past UK flood risk management prioritised engineering solutions to prevent flooding (barriers, walls, etc); today there is greater...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Orr Paula, Twigger-Ross Clare, Brooks Katya, Sadauskis Rolands
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2016-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708009
id doaj-2256e2df602b442689bd4385b93cd42e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2256e2df602b442689bd4385b93cd42e2021-02-02T06:49:12ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422016-01-0170800910.1051/e3sconf/20160708009e3sconf_flood2016_08009‘Pieces of kit’ are not enough: the role of infrastructure in community resilienceOrr Paula0Twigger-Ross Clare1Brooks Katya2Sadauskis Rolands3Collingwood Environmental Planning, Unit 1E The ChandleryCollingwood Environmental Planning, Unit 1E The ChandleryCollingwood Environmental Planning, Unit 1E The ChandleryCollingwood Environmental Planning, Unit 1E The ChandleryFlood resilience is about the ability of people and places to cope with, recover from and adapt to flooding in ways that maintain quality of life and identities. In the past UK flood risk management prioritised engineering solutions to prevent flooding (barriers, walls, etc); today there is greater emphasis on resilience. Cutter et al (2010) developed a model that describes community resilience capacities/resources in terms of social, institutional, infrastructure and economic resilience along with community capital. This paper draws on the findings of an evaluation of thirteen flood resilience community ‘pathfinder’ projects run in England between 2013 – 2015, which aimed to enable and stimulate communities to develop innovative local solutions and improve resilience to flooding. Actions to improve flood infrastructure included installing property resilience measures or setting up community flood stores providing equipment to deal with emergencies. The paper explores the way that ‘infrastructure resilience capacities’ were developed and examines how physical infrastructure contributed to community flood resilience. It finds that the development of infrastructure resilience depends on strong relations between community members (‘community capital’) as well as relationships between community organisations and flood management institutions (‘institutional resilience’). The conclusions discuss the implications for infrastructure schemes in other places.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708009
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Orr Paula
Twigger-Ross Clare
Brooks Katya
Sadauskis Rolands
spellingShingle Orr Paula
Twigger-Ross Clare
Brooks Katya
Sadauskis Rolands
‘Pieces of kit’ are not enough: the role of infrastructure in community resilience
E3S Web of Conferences
author_facet Orr Paula
Twigger-Ross Clare
Brooks Katya
Sadauskis Rolands
author_sort Orr Paula
title ‘Pieces of kit’ are not enough: the role of infrastructure in community resilience
title_short ‘Pieces of kit’ are not enough: the role of infrastructure in community resilience
title_full ‘Pieces of kit’ are not enough: the role of infrastructure in community resilience
title_fullStr ‘Pieces of kit’ are not enough: the role of infrastructure in community resilience
title_full_unstemmed ‘Pieces of kit’ are not enough: the role of infrastructure in community resilience
title_sort ‘pieces of kit’ are not enough: the role of infrastructure in community resilience
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Flood resilience is about the ability of people and places to cope with, recover from and adapt to flooding in ways that maintain quality of life and identities. In the past UK flood risk management prioritised engineering solutions to prevent flooding (barriers, walls, etc); today there is greater emphasis on resilience. Cutter et al (2010) developed a model that describes community resilience capacities/resources in terms of social, institutional, infrastructure and economic resilience along with community capital. This paper draws on the findings of an evaluation of thirteen flood resilience community ‘pathfinder’ projects run in England between 2013 – 2015, which aimed to enable and stimulate communities to develop innovative local solutions and improve resilience to flooding. Actions to improve flood infrastructure included installing property resilience measures or setting up community flood stores providing equipment to deal with emergencies. The paper explores the way that ‘infrastructure resilience capacities’ were developed and examines how physical infrastructure contributed to community flood resilience. It finds that the development of infrastructure resilience depends on strong relations between community members (‘community capital’) as well as relationships between community organisations and flood management institutions (‘institutional resilience’). The conclusions discuss the implications for infrastructure schemes in other places.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20160708009
work_keys_str_mv AT orrpaula piecesofkitarenotenoughtheroleofinfrastructureincommunityresilience
AT twiggerrossclare piecesofkitarenotenoughtheroleofinfrastructureincommunityresilience
AT brookskatya piecesofkitarenotenoughtheroleofinfrastructureincommunityresilience
AT sadauskisrolands piecesofkitarenotenoughtheroleofinfrastructureincommunityresilience
_version_ 1724300551264403456