Humans’ Best Friend? The Ethical Dilemma of Pets
The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate the need for a reassessment of the moral status of pets. I argue that pets rest on an undefined ethical borderline, which brings several puzzling problems to both human-centered ethics and animal ethics and that neither of these fields adequately handles...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
LED Edizioni Universitarie
2013-11-01
|
Series: | Relations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/view/16 |
id |
doaj-223f7bdbb7f94b2fb048fe6d85bf4490 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-223f7bdbb7f94b2fb048fe6d85bf44902020-11-25T02:19:11ZengLED Edizioni Universitarie Relations 2283-31962280-96432013-11-0112233510.7358/rela-2013-002-andr15Humans’ Best Friend? The Ethical Dilemma of PetsMatteo Andreozzi0PhD in Philosophy at University of Milan, Italy.The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate the need for a reassessment of the moral status of pets. I argue that pets rest on an undefined ethical borderline, which brings several puzzling problems to both human-centered ethics and animal ethics and that neither of these fields adequately handles these issues. I focus specifically on human relationships with companion animals as one of the most significant interspecific relationship involving humans and pets. I also show that a deeper questioning of the moral status of pets is a required step toward the moral rethinking of human-animal relationships.http://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/view/16Petscompanion animalsanimal welfareanimal liberationanimal rightsimpartialismpartialismintrinsic valuespecial dutiesrelational ethicscontextual ethics. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matteo Andreozzi |
spellingShingle |
Matteo Andreozzi Humans’ Best Friend? The Ethical Dilemma of Pets Relations Pets companion animals animal welfare animal liberation animal rights impartialism partialism intrinsic value special duties relational ethics contextual ethics. |
author_facet |
Matteo Andreozzi |
author_sort |
Matteo Andreozzi |
title |
Humans’ Best Friend? The Ethical Dilemma of Pets |
title_short |
Humans’ Best Friend? The Ethical Dilemma of Pets |
title_full |
Humans’ Best Friend? The Ethical Dilemma of Pets |
title_fullStr |
Humans’ Best Friend? The Ethical Dilemma of Pets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Humans’ Best Friend? The Ethical Dilemma of Pets |
title_sort |
humans’ best friend? the ethical dilemma of pets |
publisher |
LED Edizioni Universitarie |
series |
Relations |
issn |
2283-3196 2280-9643 |
publishDate |
2013-11-01 |
description |
The main aim of this paper is to demonstrate the need for a reassessment of the moral status of pets. I argue that pets rest on an undefined ethical borderline, which brings several puzzling problems to both human-centered ethics and animal ethics and that neither of these fields adequately handles these issues. I focus specifically on human relationships with companion animals as one of the most significant interspecific relationship involving humans and pets. I also show that a deeper questioning of the moral status of pets is a required step toward the moral rethinking of human-animal relationships. |
topic |
Pets companion animals animal welfare animal liberation animal rights impartialism partialism intrinsic value special duties relational ethics contextual ethics. |
url |
http://www.ledonline.it/index.php/Relations/article/view/16 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT matteoandreozzi humansbestfriendtheethicaldilemmaofpets |
_version_ |
1724877802492133376 |