A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale

Animal research is not only regulated by legislation but also by self-regulatory mechanisms within the scientific community, which include biomedical journals’ policies on animal use. For editorial policies to meaningfully impact attitudes and practice, they must not only be put into effect by edito...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana Raquel Martins, Nuno Henrique Franco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-04-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/5/2/315
id doaj-222f6e43c0504e699101d5e569c5b935
record_format Article
spelling doaj-222f6e43c0504e699101d5e569c5b9352020-11-24T23:04:19ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152015-04-015231533110.3390/ani5020315ani5020315A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR ScaleAna Raquel Martins0Nuno Henrique Franco1Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre S/N, 4169-007 Porto, PortugalIBMC—Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, PortugalAnimal research is not only regulated by legislation but also by self-regulatory mechanisms within the scientific community, which include biomedical journals’ policies on animal use. For editorial policies to meaningfully impact attitudes and practice, they must not only be put into effect by editors and reviewers, but also be set to high standards. We present a novel tool to classify journals’ policies on animal use—the EXEMPLAR scale—as well as an analysis by this scale of 170 journals publishing studies on animal models of three human diseases: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Type-1 Diabetes and Tuberculosis. Results show a much greater focus of editorial policies on regulatory compliance than on other domains, suggesting a transfer of journals’ responsibilities to scientists, institutions and regulators. Scores were not found to vary with journals’ impact factor, country of origin or antiquity, but were, however, significantly higher for open access journals, which may be a result of their greater exposure and consequent higher public scrutiny.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/5/2/315animal researchanimal ethicsanimal welfareeditorial policiesEXEMPLAR scale
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana Raquel Martins
Nuno Henrique Franco
spellingShingle Ana Raquel Martins
Nuno Henrique Franco
A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale
Animals
animal research
animal ethics
animal welfare
editorial policies
EXEMPLAR scale
author_facet Ana Raquel Martins
Nuno Henrique Franco
author_sort Ana Raquel Martins
title A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale
title_short A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale
title_full A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale
title_fullStr A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale
title_full_unstemmed A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale
title_sort critical look at biomedical journals’ policies on animal research by use of a novel tool: the exemplar scale
publisher MDPI AG
series Animals
issn 2076-2615
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Animal research is not only regulated by legislation but also by self-regulatory mechanisms within the scientific community, which include biomedical journals’ policies on animal use. For editorial policies to meaningfully impact attitudes and practice, they must not only be put into effect by editors and reviewers, but also be set to high standards. We present a novel tool to classify journals’ policies on animal use—the EXEMPLAR scale—as well as an analysis by this scale of 170 journals publishing studies on animal models of three human diseases: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Type-1 Diabetes and Tuberculosis. Results show a much greater focus of editorial policies on regulatory compliance than on other domains, suggesting a transfer of journals’ responsibilities to scientists, institutions and regulators. Scores were not found to vary with journals’ impact factor, country of origin or antiquity, but were, however, significantly higher for open access journals, which may be a result of their greater exposure and consequent higher public scrutiny.
topic animal research
animal ethics
animal welfare
editorial policies
EXEMPLAR scale
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/5/2/315
work_keys_str_mv AT anaraquelmartins acriticallookatbiomedicaljournalspoliciesonanimalresearchbyuseofanoveltooltheexemplarscale
AT nunohenriquefranco acriticallookatbiomedicaljournalspoliciesonanimalresearchbyuseofanoveltooltheexemplarscale
AT anaraquelmartins criticallookatbiomedicaljournalspoliciesonanimalresearchbyuseofanoveltooltheexemplarscale
AT nunohenriquefranco criticallookatbiomedicaljournalspoliciesonanimalresearchbyuseofanoveltooltheexemplarscale
_version_ 1725631174509854720