A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale
Animal research is not only regulated by legislation but also by self-regulatory mechanisms within the scientific community, which include biomedical journals’ policies on animal use. For editorial policies to meaningfully impact attitudes and practice, they must not only be put into effect by edito...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2015-04-01
|
Series: | Animals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/5/2/315 |
id |
doaj-222f6e43c0504e699101d5e569c5b935 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-222f6e43c0504e699101d5e569c5b9352020-11-24T23:04:19ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152015-04-015231533110.3390/ani5020315ani5020315A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR ScaleAna Raquel Martins0Nuno Henrique Franco1Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre S/N, 4169-007 Porto, PortugalIBMC—Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, PortugalAnimal research is not only regulated by legislation but also by self-regulatory mechanisms within the scientific community, which include biomedical journals’ policies on animal use. For editorial policies to meaningfully impact attitudes and practice, they must not only be put into effect by editors and reviewers, but also be set to high standards. We present a novel tool to classify journals’ policies on animal use—the EXEMPLAR scale—as well as an analysis by this scale of 170 journals publishing studies on animal models of three human diseases: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Type-1 Diabetes and Tuberculosis. Results show a much greater focus of editorial policies on regulatory compliance than on other domains, suggesting a transfer of journals’ responsibilities to scientists, institutions and regulators. Scores were not found to vary with journals’ impact factor, country of origin or antiquity, but were, however, significantly higher for open access journals, which may be a result of their greater exposure and consequent higher public scrutiny.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/5/2/315animal researchanimal ethicsanimal welfareeditorial policiesEXEMPLAR scale |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ana Raquel Martins Nuno Henrique Franco |
spellingShingle |
Ana Raquel Martins Nuno Henrique Franco A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale Animals animal research animal ethics animal welfare editorial policies EXEMPLAR scale |
author_facet |
Ana Raquel Martins Nuno Henrique Franco |
author_sort |
Ana Raquel Martins |
title |
A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale |
title_short |
A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale |
title_full |
A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale |
title_fullStr |
A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Critical Look at Biomedical Journals’ Policies on Animal Research by Use of a Novel Tool: The EXEMPLAR Scale |
title_sort |
critical look at biomedical journals’ policies on animal research by use of a novel tool: the exemplar scale |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Animals |
issn |
2076-2615 |
publishDate |
2015-04-01 |
description |
Animal research is not only regulated by legislation but also by self-regulatory mechanisms within the scientific community, which include biomedical journals’ policies on animal use. For editorial policies to meaningfully impact attitudes and practice, they must not only be put into effect by editors and reviewers, but also be set to high standards. We present a novel tool to classify journals’ policies on animal use—the EXEMPLAR scale—as well as an analysis by this scale of 170 journals publishing studies on animal models of three human diseases: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Type-1 Diabetes and Tuberculosis. Results show a much greater focus of editorial policies on regulatory compliance than on other domains, suggesting a transfer of journals’ responsibilities to scientists, institutions and regulators. Scores were not found to vary with journals’ impact factor, country of origin or antiquity, but were, however, significantly higher for open access journals, which may be a result of their greater exposure and consequent higher public scrutiny. |
topic |
animal research animal ethics animal welfare editorial policies EXEMPLAR scale |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/5/2/315 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anaraquelmartins acriticallookatbiomedicaljournalspoliciesonanimalresearchbyuseofanoveltooltheexemplarscale AT nunohenriquefranco acriticallookatbiomedicaljournalspoliciesonanimalresearchbyuseofanoveltooltheexemplarscale AT anaraquelmartins criticallookatbiomedicaljournalspoliciesonanimalresearchbyuseofanoveltooltheexemplarscale AT nunohenriquefranco criticallookatbiomedicaljournalspoliciesonanimalresearchbyuseofanoveltooltheexemplarscale |
_version_ |
1725631174509854720 |